CovidResearchTrials by Shray Alag


CovidResearchTrials Covid 19 Research using Clinical Trials (Home Page)


HP:0100651: Type I diabetes mellitusHPO

Developed by Shray Alag
Clinical Trial MeSH HPO Drug Gene SNP Protein Mutation


Correlated Drug Terms (5)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
drug1001 Glycaemic levels Wiki 0.50
drug593 CoYoT1 Care Wiki 0.50
drug2449 Tele-interventions related to diabetes management and mental well-being Wiki 0.50
drug1693 Online survey Wiki 0.29
drug2300 Standard Care Wiki 0.25

Correlated MeSH Terms (3)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
D003922 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 NIH 1.00
D003924 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 NIH 0.41
D003920 Diabetes Mellitus, NIH 0.32

Correlated HPO Terms (2)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
HP:0005978 Type II diabetes mellitus HPO 0.41
HP:0000819 Diabetes mellitus HPO 0.32

There are 4 clinical trials

Clinical Trials


1 CoYoT1 to California - Telemedicine to Engage Young Adults With Diabetes

CoYoT1 to California (CTC) was initiated to develop a patient-centered, home telehealth care model for young adults (YA) ages 16-25 with T1D. It is a 2x2 factorial design, 15-month intervention. Eighty participants will be randomized to Standard Care or CoYoT1 Care, which is delivered by telehealth or in-person. CoYoT1 Care is a patient-centered care model that consists of three major components: shared decision making (patient and provider agree upon priorities for the medical visit), autonomy and supportive care (provider training in communication strategies such as motivational interviewing), and goal setting and action planning (provider training to coach YA in setting SMART goals, developing action plans, and designing follow up plans). Additionally, didactic expert-led sessions (Standard Care) or peer-led, YA-driven group sessions (CoYoT1 Care) are included. At the end of the study, a focus group will be completed to assist in determining which features YA felt were critical to their success from the telehealth intervention, group components, and provider behaviors. ***COVID-19 Update: Due to current hospital and clinical policy adaptation for COVID-19, all participants who were randomized into in-person appointments will now receive care via Telehealth. Telehealth has been implemented hospital-wide and will be the temporary delivery of care method during this pandemic. Participants have been notified of this change and given instruction on how to participate in a Telehealth appointment.

NCT03793673 Type Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Behavioral: CoYoT1 Care Other: Standard Care
MeSH:Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
HPO:Type I diabetes mellitus

Primary Outcomes

Description: Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Abstraction - number of appointments; multiple choice and open ended

Measure: Number of participants with completed appointments in telemedicine cohort

Time: 12 months

Description: Patient online attendance as assessed using an online patient experience questionnaire - Polar Questions; Yes or no response questions related to patient's online appointment (i.e., did you have an online appointment? Did you attend your appointment?)

Measure: Number of participants with completed appointments in telemedicine cohort

Time: 12 months

Description: In-person patient appointment attendance assessed using an online patient experience questionnaire. Polar questions; Yes or No response questions related to patient's in-person appointment (i.e., did you have an in-person appointment? Did you attend your in-person appointment?

Measure: Number of participants with completed medical appointments in standard care cohort

Time: 12 months

Description: : Likert scale "Very dissatisfied" is 1, "Dissatisfied" is 2, "Neutral" is 3, "Satisfied" is 4, and "Very Satisfied" is 5. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction, lower scores indicate low satisfaction

Measure: Patient and Provider Satisfaction as assessed using the Health Care Climate questionnaire

Time: 12 months

Description: Cultural Competence Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) - likert Scale; range 0-10, low range indicates low trust and high values indicate trust.

Measure: Provider Experience as assessed using the CAHPS survey

Time: 12 months

Description: Likert scale; "Strongly disagree" is 1, "Somewhat disagree" is 2, "Neutral" is 3, "Somewhat Agree" is 4, and "Strongly Agree" is 5. Scores are summed and the average is taken; higher scores is more self-efficacy

Measure: Patient Satisfaction with appointment type as assessed using the Updated CoYoT1 Satisfaction Questionnaire

Time: [Time Frame: For each visit (until the end of study) - 12 months]

Description: Telehealth Utilization satisfaction as assessed using a telehealth satisfaction questionnaire. Likert scale; range 1-5, low values indicate low satisfaction and higher values indicate high satisfaction. Polar: Yes or No response questions, "Would you use telehealth again?" Open ended; patient comments about experience.

Measure: Provider Satisfaction as assessed using the Satisfaction Provider survey

Time: 12 months

Description: Patient Experience Measures Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) - likert Scale; range 0-10; lower range represents low rating, higher ranges indicate higher rating

Measure: Patient Experience

Time: 12 months

Description: Social determinants of health as assessed using a social and environmental factors questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questions about food insecurity and transportation, "did you worry that your food would run out before you got money to buy more?" "have you or your family ever been unable to go to the doctor because of distance or transportation?"

Measure: Social Determinants of Health Tool

Time: At 0 (baseline)

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Transportation cost to patient as assessed using a Transportation Questionnaire. Multiple choice questions about mode of transportation used to get to appointment, "driving own vehicle," "riding public transit," "ride with family member or friend." Open ended to assess cost of parking, bus fare.

Measure: Costs to Patients

Time: 12 months

Description: Number of patients with need for a technology device (cellphone) as assessed using a Device Assessment questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No question about access to personal device patient has for online appointment, "do you have a personal device to access the internet?." Multiple choice questions about device; "Mobile phone," "Laptop," "Tablet," "Ethernet," "Wi-Fi."

Measure: Costs to Patients

Time: 12 months

Description: Diabetes visit expenses questions - polar questions, multiple choice, and open-ended

Measure: Costs to Patients

Time: 12 months

Description: Cost to Institution as assessed by Patient Health Utilization questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questions about health service usage in the last three months, "have you had to be admitted to the hospital?" Open-ended question about number of time health services were used, "how many times were you admitted to the hospital for reasons related to diabetes?"

Measure: Cost to Instituition

Time: 12 months

Description: Cost to Institution as assessed using the Online Appointment questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questions about attendance to online appointment. "Did you attend your online appointment?" "What types of providers did you see?" Open-ended questions asking about time, "how long did it take?"

Measure: Cost to Instituition

Time: 12 months

Description: Cost to Institution as assessed using the In-Person Appointment questionnaire. Polar; Yes or No questionnaire about appointment attendance; "did you attend an in-person appointment?" "How long was your in-person appointment?" Open-ended questions about time, "how long did it take?"

Measure: Cost to Instituition

Time: 12 months

Description: Cost to Institution as assessed using the Clinic Cost, Preparation, and Delivery for Providers and Staff questionnaire. Multiple choice questions about person (Doctor, Nurse and Social Worker) and appointment type provided to patient

Measure: Cost to Instituition

Time: 12 months

Description: Cost to Institution as assessed using Team Costs of Provider and Staff Training questionnaire. Multiple choice questions used to identify person being trained, "Doctor," "Nurse Practitioner," "Social Worker." Polar; Yes or No questions about provider and staff training for telehealth appointment; training on, "camera and mic," "loading Webex platform."

Measure: Cost to Instituition

Time: 12 months

Description: Lab Results: Electronic Medical Record Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) %

Measure: Glycemic Control at Baseline

Time: HbA1c for the last 12 months

Description: Lab Results: Electronic Medical Record Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) %

Measure: Glycemic Control Progression

Time: For each visit (until the end of study) - 12 months

Description: Cost to Payor as assessed using Health Care Utilization Online questionnaire. Polar; Yes and No questions about patient use of health services, "In the last 3 months, has 911 been called because of your diabetes?" Open-ended questions about rate of health service use, "how many times was 911 called?"

Measure: Cost to Payor

Time: 12 months (monthly)

Description: Cost to payor as assessed using Clinic Cost, Preparation, and Delivery questionnaire for Providers or Staff. Open ended questions about length of training and technology used, along with any comments about appointment delivery.

Measure: Cost to Payor

Time: 12 months

Description: Cost to payor as assessed using the Team Costs of Provider or Staff questionnaire. Open ended question asking about length of training and training required on "billing process," "data collection process," "camera and mic."

Measure: Cost to Payor

Time: 12 months

Description: Multiple Choice and fill-in. Questions about time spent training young adults and training required on "Agenda setting", "Camera and Mic", "Loading Webex platform".

Measure: Cost to Payor as as assessed using the Team Costs- YA

Time: 12 months

Other Outcomes

Description: Likert scale; used to measure respondents' endorsement of particular statements. Descriptive system top answer is 1 and last answer is 5. Missing items will be coded as 9. Online software used to score.

Measure: Self-care, mobility, and anxiety and depression as assessed using the EuroQOL five dimensions five levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.

Time: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

Description: "Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day)" is 0, "Some or a little of the time (1-2 days)" is 1, "Occasionally or a moderate amount of time" is 2, "Most or all of the time (5-7 days)" is 3. The scoring of positive items is reversed. Possible range of scores is zero to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology.

Measure: Depressive symptoms assessed using the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Scale (CES-D)

Time: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

Description: Likert scale; "Excellent" is 1, "Very good" is 2, "Good" is 3, "Fair" is 4, and "Poor" is 5. An algorithm is used to generate the physical and mental health composite scores for comparison (a confirmatory factor analyses).Items are scored so that a higher score indicates a better health state.

Measure: Patient health-related quality of life as assessed using the Your Health and Well-being Short-Form 12 item Version 2 (SF12V2) measure

Time: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

Description: Likert scale; "Not a problem" is 1, "A slight problem" is 2, "A moderate problem" is 3, "Somewhat serious problem" is 4, "A Serious Problem" is 5, and "A very serious problem" is 6. There are 4 subscales that address the dimensions of distress and to score, the appropriate item(s) are summed and divided by appropriate number. A mean item score of 3 or higher is considered moderate distress. burden, regimen distress, interpersonal distress and physician distress; likert scale

Measure: Dimensions of distress (e.g., emotional burden, regimen distress, interpersonal distress and physician distress) as assessed using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)

Time: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

Description: Diabetes-related psychosocial self-efficacy as assessed using the Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (DES-SF); Likert scale; "Strongly disagree" is 1, "Somewhat disagree" is 2, "Neutral" is 3, "Somewhat Agree" is 4, and "Strongly Agree" is 5. Scores are summed and the average is taken; higher scores is more self-efficacy

Measure: Assessment of Diabetes-Related Psychosocial Self-Efficacy

Time: At 0 (baseline) and 12 months (after visit 4)

Description: Multiple Choice. Questions about diabetes related self care, "How many hours per day do you currently devote to managing your glucose levels?"

Measure: Self Care - Realted to Diabetes as assessed by Self-Care questionnaire

Time: [At 0 (baseline) and each visit (until the end of study) - 12 months]

2 Impact of Tele-Interventions During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Glycemic Control and Attitude Toward the Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus - A Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION In critical situations, such as the current COVID 19 pandemic, themes of fear, uncertainty and stigmatization are common and constitute barriers to appropriate medical and mental health interventions. These challenges, when faced by those who live with a chronic disease, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), can negatively influence quality of life and adherence to treatment, compromising the control of the disease. OBJECTIVES The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a tele-intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in improving glycemic control, lipid profile, blood pressure levels and parameters of medication adherence, mental well-being and sleep quality in patients with type 1 DM and type 2 DM. METHODS A randomized clinical trial will be carried out with patients with a previous diagnosis of type 1 DM and type 2 DM, who are registered at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Inclusion criteria will be age greater than or equal to 18 years, collection of HbA1c in the HCPA laboratory in January, February or March 2020 and availability to receive weekly phone calls. Patients will be randomized, stratified by type of diabetes, in two groups: G1: participants will receive a tele-intervention by a case manager weekly to discuss topics related to diabetes management and mental well-being during the social distancing period ; G2: participants will receive the usual care. The primary outcome assessed will be the variation in HbA1c levels comparatively between groups, with or without a tele-guided strategy, after four months of social distancing (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains). Secondary outcomes will include experiencing confirmation of COVID-19 infection, variation in lipid profile, blood pressure levels and variation in parameters of emotional distress related to diabetes, eating disorders, medication adherence, symptoms minor psychiatric disorders and altered sleep patterns, which will be evaluated with specific and validated scales. According to the sample calculation, 150 patients will be included in the study (92 with type 2 DM and 58 with type 1 DM). Analysis by intention to treat will be performed separately for patients with type 1 DM and with type 2 DM. SCHEDULE The proposed experiment will start immediately after approval of this project by the research ethics committee. The duration of the proposed intervention is 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains. This means that the study may be completed before or after that period, based on national recommendations for social distancing in Brazil), with a data analysis plan and publication of the results until September 2020.

NCT04344210 COVID Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Behavioral: Tele-interventions related to diabetes management and mental well-being
MeSH:Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
HPO:Diabetes mellitus Type I diabetes mellitus Type II diabetes mellitus

Primary Outcomes

Description: Variation in HbA1c levels comparatively between groups after the period of social distancing measures.

Measure: Variation in HbA1c levels

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Confirmation of coronavirus infection by rapid test

Measure: COVID-19 infection

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Description: Comparison of the lipid profile of the last year with the lipid profile after the intervention between the groups.

Measure: Variation in lipid profile

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Description: Comparison of the blood pressure level of the last consultation with the pressure after the intervention between the groups.

Measure: Variation in blood pressure levels

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Description: Evaluation of emotional distress associated with the routine of living with diabetes - B-PAID (Brazilian Problem Areas In Diabetes Scale)

Measure: Comparison of emotional distress associated with the routine of living with diabetes after intervention between groups

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Description: Evaluation of eating disorders - EAT - 26 SCALE (Teste de Atitudes Alimentares)

Measure: Comparison of eating disorders between groups

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Description: Evaluation of adherence to the proposed clinical treatment - SCI R (Self-Care Inventory - revised)

Measure: Comparison of adherence to the proposed clinical treatment between groups

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Description: Evaluation of minor psychiatric disorders - SRQ 20 (Self Report Questionnaire)

Measure: Comparison of minor psychiatric disorders between groups

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

Description: Evaluation of sleep pattern changes - MSQ (Mini Sleep Questionnaire)

Measure: Comparison of sleep pattern changes between groups

Time: 4 months (or as long as the recommendation of social distancing measures remains)

3 Patient Living With Type 1 Diabetes' Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Quebec

Given the current situation with COVID-19 declared pandemic on March 11, 2020 and the requirement for physical distancing and to limit social interactions, and for some, to quarantine, the investigators will survey patients living with type 1 diabetes (and their families, if they are <18 years) about their current experience with their diabetes management to understand their needs. The primary objective is to describe the exposition and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on type 1 diabetes. The investigators will recruit people with type 1 diabetes from all ages living in Quebec to answer a short online survey.

NCT04384471 Type1diabetes Covid19 Other: Online survey
MeSH:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
HPO:Type I diabetes mellitus

Primary Outcomes

Description: Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis

Measure: Self-reported acute diabetes complication

Time: Since March 11, 2020

Secondary Outcomes

Description: In the last week, how many episodes of hypoglycemia did you have? Answer based on the following definition of hypoglycemia: measured blood sugar levels lower than 4.0 mmol/L and/or common symptoms [shaking, sweating, anxiety, confusion, difficulty concentrating, nausea, or other symptoms] and/or disappearance of symptoms with carbohydrate intake.

Measure: Self-reported hypoglycemia

Time: Last 7 days

Description: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 11), have you had difficulty getting a hold of any of the following diabetes supplies Scale: 1- no difficulties at all to 7- I could not get any supplies i) Blood glucose meter ii) Blood glucose meter strips iii) Insulin iv) Glucagon v) Ketone strips vi) Continuous glucose monitor sensors or related supplies vii) Insulin pump supplies viii) Alcohol wipes

Measure: Ability to get diabetes supplies and to access diabetes care

Time: Since March 11, 2020

Description: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 11), are you worried about access to any of the following diabetes supplies? Scale: 1- not at all worried to 7- I am very worried i) Blood glucose meter ii) Blood glucose meter strips iii) Insulin iv) Glucagon v) Ketone strips vi) Continuous glucose monitor sensors or related supplies vii) Insulin pump supplies viii) Alcohol wipes

Measure: Concern about not having access to diabetes supplies and to access diabetes care

Time: Since March 11, 2020

Description: Two questions on food security One question on physical activity

Measure: Impact of the pandemic situation on daily life activities

Time: Since March 11, 2020

Description: PHQ-9 scale for depression screening and the GAD7 scale for generalized anxiety among adult participants.

Measure: Impact on stress, anxiety and depression for adults participants

Time: Last 2 weeks

Description: Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) for children and adolescent.

Measure: Impact on stress, anxiety and depression for children and adolescents

Time: Last 2 weeks

4 Glycaemia and Cardiac Function in Patients With COVID-19

The study design is observational, exploratory study consisting of two cohorts of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU and the medical ward, respectively. The primary outcome focusing on the effect of plasma glucose levels on cardiac function will be evaluated by repeated assessment of cardiac function by echocardiography and measurement of plasma glucose. Furthermore, blood coagulability will be evaluated to determine the importance of diabetes status and plasma glucose changes for whole blood coagulability at time of admission to the ICU and progression in coagulability abnormalities. In the medical ward cohort, two assessments will be performed separated by no more than 12 hours. In the ICU cohort, three assessments will be performed separated by no more than 6 hours. Ideally, 60 patients with COVID-19 will be included in the ICU cohort with a 1:1 distribution between patient with and without diabetes. Ideally, 40 patients with diabetes will be included in the cohort of patients admitted to medical ward (hospitalisation cohort). The primary hypothesis is that levels of plasma glucose have clinically significant impact on left ventricular systolic function in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. The secondary hypothesis is that the impact of plasma glucose on left ventricular systolic function is associated with glycaemic control prior to admission as measured by HbA1c.

NCT04410718 Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 COVID Other: Glycaemic levels
MeSH:Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
HPO:Diabetes mellitus Type I diabetes mellitus Type II diabetes mellitus

Primary Outcomes

Description: The within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by left ventricular ejection fraction (a pooled analysis of the hospitalisation cohort and ICU cohort)

Measure: Plasma glucose levels and left ventricular ejection fraction

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Difference in the within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by left ventricular ejection fraction between patients with chronic hyperglycaemia prior to admission (HbA1c >53 mmol/mol) and with normoglycaemia prior to admission (HbA1c ≤53 mmol/l) (ICU cohort only)

Measure: Key secondary outcome: HbA1c, plasma glucose levels and left ventricular systolic function

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: The within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by strain analysis (a pooled analysis of the hospitalisation cohort and ICU cohort)

Measure: Plasma glucose levels and strain analysis

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: The within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by mitral annular systolic velocity (a pooled analysis of the hospitalisation cohort and ICU cohort)

Measure: Plasma glucose levels and mitral annular systolic velocity

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: Differences in the within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by left ventricular ejection fraction between the hospitalisation cohort, the ICU cohort with diabetes and the ICU cohort without diabetes, respectively

Measure: Plasma glucose levels and left ventricular ejection fraction (sub-group analysis)

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: Differences in the within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by strain analysis between the hospitalisation cohort, the ICU cohort with diabetes and the ICU cohort without diabetes, respectively

Measure: Plasma glucose levels and strain analysis (sub-group analysis)

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: Differences in the within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by mitral annular systolic velocity between the hospitalisation cohort, the ICU cohort with diabetes and the ICU cohort without diabetes, respectively

Measure: Plasma glucose levels and mitral annular systolic velocity (sub-group analysis)

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: Difference in the within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by strain analysis between patients with chronic hyperglycaemia prior to admission (HbA1c >53 mmol/mol) and with normoglycaemia prior to admission (HbA1c ≤53 mmol/l) (ICU cohort only)

Measure: HbA1c, Plasma glucose levels and strain analysis

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: Difference in the within-subject effect of plasma glucose levels on left ventricular systolic function as measured by mitral annular systolic velocity between patients with chronic hyperglycaemia prior to admission (HbA1c >53 mmol/mol) and with normoglycaemia prior to admission (HbA1c ≤53 mmol/l) (ICU cohort only)

Measure: HbA1c, Plasma glucose levels and mitral annular systolic velocity

Time: The study applies a mixed model for assessment of within-subject effects by repeated assessment in same individual. The time frame is from first assessment until last assessment (max. 24 hours).

Description: Difference in whole blood coagulability and fibrinolysis as measured by TEG between patients with and without diabetes at time of admission to the ICU (ICU cohort only)

Measure: Diabetes status and whole blood coagulability and fibrinolysis

Time: At time of admission to the ICU (max. 24 hours after admission to the ICU)

Description: Difference in change in whole blood coagulability and fibrinolysis as measured by TEG between patients with and without diabetes treated at the ICU (ICU cohort only)

Measure: Diabetes status and change in whole blood coagulability and fibrinolysis during ICU stay

Time: From first until last assessment during ICU stay (max. 24 hours).

Description: The prognostic value of cardiac function and TEG on the following patient outcomes 1) need for treatment in the ICU (hospitalisation cohort only) 2) need for respirator treatment (hospitalisation cohort only) 3) COVID-19 related death

Measure: Prognostic value of TEG analysis

Time: From time of admission and until four weeks after admission

Description: The prognostic value of cardiac function on the following patient outcomes 1) need for treatment in the ICU (hospitalisation cohort only) 2) need for respirator treatment (hospitalisation cohort only) 3) COVID-19 related death

Measure: Prognostic value of cardiac function

Time: From time of admission and until four weeks after admission

Description: Difference in cardiac damage as measured by high-sensitivity troponin (hs-troponin) between patients with and without diabetes admitted to the ICU (ICU cohort only)

Measure: Diabetes status and high-sensitivity troponins

Time: At the time of admission to the ICU (max. 24 hours after admission to the ICU)

Description: Difference in change in cardiac damage as measured by high-sensitivity troponin (hs-troponin) between patients with and without diabetes admitted to the ICU (ICU cohort only)

Measure: Diabetes status and change high-sensitivity troponins

Time: From first until last assessment during ICU stay (max. 24 hours)


HPO Nodes