Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug708 | Dabigatran etexilate + BI 1323495 Wiki | 0.38 |
drug970 | Furosemide Injection, USP Wiki | 0.38 |
drug2450 | Tele-medicine platform Wiki | 0.38 |
drug969 | Furosemide Injection Solution for subcutaneous administration (80 mg) Wiki | 0.38 |
drug19 | 1: Prone positioning Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1790 | Performance of WHEELS-I in promoting DASH/SRD adoption Wiki | 0.38 |
drug2455 | Telehealth Consultation Wiki | 0.38 |
drug2111 | Rosuvastatin Wiki | 0.38 |
drug827 | Effects of a 2-week DASH/SRD intervention vs. control diet on HFpEF functional cardiovascular risk factors Wiki | 0.38 |
drug762 | Diet tracking and survey Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1375 | Low Dose (10 mg) Control Wiki | 0.38 |
drug28 | 2: No instruction regarding positioning Wiki | 0.38 |
drug707 | Dabigatran etexilate Wiki | 0.38 |
drug809 | EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Wiki | 0.38 |
drug2112 | Rosuvastatin + BI 1323495 Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1726 | PB1046 Wiki | 0.38 |
drug269 | Azithromycin Tablets Wiki | 0.27 |
drug1103 | Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Wiki | 0.10 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
D006333 | Heart Failure NIH | 1.00 |
D000787 | Angina Pectoris NIH | 0.38 |
D024821 | Metabolic Syndrome NIH | 0.38 |
D011654 | Pulmonary Edema NIH | 0.38 |
D054143 | Heart Failure, Systolic NIH | 0.38 |
D000075902 | Clinical Deterioration NIH | 0.27 |
D014652 | Vascular Diseases NIH | 0.27 |
D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases NIH | 0.27 |
D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease NIH | 0.22 |
D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis NIH | 0.22 |
D054058 | Acute Coronary Syndrome NIH | 0.22 |
D051437 | Renal Insufficiency, NIH | 0.19 |
D003327 | Coronary Disease NIH | 0.19 |
D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease NIH | 0.19 |
D008175 | Lung Neoplasms NIH | 0.19 |
D008103 | Liver Cirrhosis, NIH | 0.19 |
D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases NIH | 0.16 |
D011665 | Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency NIH | 0.15 |
D007676 | Kidney Failure, Chronic NIH | 0.15 |
D029424 | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive NIH | 0.13 |
D009203 | Myocardial Ischemia NIH | 0.13 |
D017563 | Lung Diseases, Interstitial NIH | 0.12 |
D002908 | Chronic Disease NIH | 0.12 |
D008171 | Lung Diseases, NIH | 0.10 |
D009369 | Neoplasms, NIH | 0.08 |
D013577 | Syndrome NIH | 0.08 |
D007249 | Inflammation NIH | 0.08 |
D055371 | Acute Lung Injury NIH | 0.04 |
D012127 | Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn NIH | 0.04 |
D012128 | Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult NIH | 0.03 |
D011014 | Pneumonia NIH | 0.02 |
D045169 | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome NIH | 0.02 |
D018352 | Coronavirus Infections NIH | 0.02 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
HP:0100598 | Pulmonary edema HPO | 0.38 |
HP:0001681 | Angina pectoris HPO | 0.38 |
HP:0001677 | Coronary artery atherosclerosis HPO | 0.19 |
HP:0000083 | Renal insufficiency HPO | 0.19 |
HP:0001395 | Hepatic fibrosis HPO | 0.19 |
HP:0100526 | Neoplasm of the lung HPO | 0.19 |
HP:0004950 | Peripheral arterial stenosis HPO | 0.17 |
HP:0001626 | Abnormality of the cardiovascular system HPO | 0.16 |
HP:0010444 | Pulmonary insufficiency HPO | 0.15 |
HP:0001658 | Myocardial infarction HPO | 0.13 |
HP:0006510 | Chronic pulmonary obstruction HPO | 0.13 |
HP:0006515 | Interstitial pneumonitis HPO | 0.12 |
HP:0002088 | Abnormal lung morphology HPO | 0.10 |
HP:0002664 | Neoplasm HPO | 0.08 |
HP:0002090 | Pneumonia HPO | 0.02 |
There are 7 clinical trials
Tens of thousands of Veterans have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and suffer poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and high death rates. Older Veterans and those with high blood pressure, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome (abnormal cholesterol and resistance to insulin's effects) are particularly at risk for HFpEF. However, it is not clear why only some Veterans in this risk group eventually develop HFpEF. Extensive information from experimental animal models and some human studies suggests that dietary patterns in vulnerable 'salt-sensitive' people could contribute to the risk for HFpEF. Reducing salt intake and increasing overall dietary quality in at-risk Veterans could prevent heart and blood vessel damage that ultimately leads to HFpEF. Reducing the development of HFpEF, which currently has no definitive treatment, is highly relevant to the VA's mission to emphasize prevention of disease and population health.
Description: Velocity of pulse wave traveling between carotid and femoral artery; validated measure of arterial stiffness
Measure: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity Time: Phase 1 of study, change from baseline at the end of week 2 and week 4Description: Left ventricular mass indexed to height
Measure: Left ventricular mass index Time: Phase 2 of study, change from baseline to 6 monthsDescription: Ventricular stiffness k, by Parametrized Diastolic Formalism analysis
Measure: Ventricular stiffness Time: Phase 1 of study, change from baseline at the end of week 2 and week 4Description: Global longitudinal left ventricular strain, a sensitive measure of ventricular systolic function
Measure: Global longitudinal left ventricular strain Time: Phase 1 of study, change from baseline at the end of week 2 and week 4Description: Global left atrial strain, a novel measure of atrial function
Measure: Global left atrial strain Time: Phase 1 of study, change from baseline at the end of week 2 and week 4Description: Velocity of pulse wave traveling between carotid and femoral artery; validated measure of arterial stiffness
Measure: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity Time: Phase 2 of study, change from baseline to 6 monthsDescription: Left atrial volume by 3D echocardiography
Measure: Left atrial volume Time: Phase 2 of study, change from baseline to 6 monthsDescription: Change in 24-hour mean of >= 8 mmHg will define the salt-sensitive blood pressure phenotype
Measure: Salt-sensitivity phenotype Time: Phase 1 of study, change from baseline at the end of week 2 and week 4Description: Measure of dietary sodium intake
Measure: 24-hour urinary sodium excretion Time: Phase 2 of study, change from baseline to 6 monthsDescription: Sodium-restricted DASH diet score on Food Frequency Questionnaire, measured by complete or partial adherence to 9 dietary domains
Measure: Sodium-restricted DASH diet adherence Time: Phase 2 of study, change from baseline to 6 monthsDescription: Analysis of 3-day food diaries by a Registered Dietitian, utilizing the Nutrition Data System for Research
Measure: Sodium-restricted DASH diet adherence Time: Phase 2 of study, months 1 and 6The objective of this protocol is to test the effectiveness of a Jumpstart intervention on patient-centered outcomes for patients with chronic illness by ensuring that they receive care that is concordant with their goals over time, and across settings and providers. This study will examine the effect of the EHR-based intervention to improve quality of palliative care for patients over the age of 65 with chronic, life-limiting illness with a particular emphasis on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). The specific aims are: 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel EHR-based (electronic health record) clinician Jumpstart guide, compared with usual care, for improving the quality of care; the primary outcome is documentation of a goals-of-care discussion during the hospitalization. Secondary outcomes focus on intensity of care: ICU use, ICU and hospital length of stay, costs of care during the hospitalization, and 30-day hospital readmissions; and 2) to conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the Jumpstart intervention, guided by the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks for implementation science, incorporating quantitative assessments of effectiveness, implementation and maintenance and qualitative assessments of clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to future implementation and dissemination.
Description: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who have a goals-of-care (GOC) discussion that has been documented in the EHR in the period between randomization and 30 days following randomization The proportion is the number of patients with GOC documentation over the number of patients in each study arm. Documentation of goals-of-care discussions will be evaluated using our NLP/ML methods. Study staff will manually review and compare findings using a randomly-selected sample of charts using our standard EHR abstraction methods; manual chart abstraction will be the gold standard.
Measure: EHR documentation of Goals of Care discussions Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of ICU admissions during the patient's (index) hospital stay will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care/ICU use: ICU admissions Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of days the patient spent in the ICU during their (index) hospital stay will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care/ICU use: ICU length of stay Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of days the patient spent in the hospital during that (index) hospital stay will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care/Hospital use: Hospital length of stay Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of hospital readmissions between randomization and 30 days following randomization will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care: Hospital Readmissions 30 days Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of ICU readmissions between randomization and 30 days following randomization will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care: ICU Readmissions 30 days Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Costs for intervention vs. control will be reported in US dollars and identified from UW Medicine administrative financial databases. Costs will be reported for total hospital costs and disaggregated costs (direct-variable, direct fixed, indirect costs). Direct-variable costs will include supply and drug costs. Direct-fixed costs will include labor, clinical department administration, and overhead fees. Indirect costs represent services provided by cost centers not directly linked to patient care such as information technology and environmental services. Costs for ED (emergency department) days and ICU days will be similarly assessed.
Measure: Intensity of care: Healthcare costs Time: 1 and 3 months after randomizationDescription: From Washington State death certificates.
Measure: All-cause mortality at 1 year (safety outcome) Time: 1 year after randomizationDescription: Qualitative interviews after individual participation. Interviews will be guided by the RE-AIM and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore the factors associated with implementation (e.g., reach, maintenance, feasibility, inner and outer settings, individuals, and processes of care.) Individual constructs within these domains were chosen to fit this specific intervention and context.
Measure: Key Implementation Factors Time: 3 months after randomizationManagement of known patients with cardiovascular disease (in particular the whole spectrum of atherosclerotic ischaemic coronary artery disease, essential hypertension under treatment, and also patients with chronic heart failure under medication) and with other associated chronic pathologies, with obvious effects on the management of the pandemic with modern / distance means (e-Health) of patients at high risk of mortality in contact with coronavirus. Given the Covid-19 Pandemic, all the above complex cardiovascular patients are under the obligation to stay in the house isolated and can no longer come to standard clinical and paraclinical monitoring and control visits. Therefore, a remote management solution (tele-medicine) of these patients must be found. The Investigators endeavour is to create an electronic platform to communicate with these patients and offer solutions for their cardiovascular health issues (including psychological and religious problems due to isolation). The Investigators intend to create this platform for communicating with a patient and stratify their complaints in risk levels. A given specialist will sort and classify their needs on a scale, based on specific algorithms (derived from the clinical European Cardiovascular Guidelines), and generate specific protocols varying from 911 like emergencies to cardiological advices or psychological sessions. These could include medication changing of doses, dietary advices or exercise restrictions. Moreover, in those patients suspected of COVID infection, special assistance should be provided per protocol.
Description: Development of an electronic (e-HEALTH) framework structure for management of patients with known cardiovascular disease in COVID19 pandemic social context
Measure: Providing a special electronic platform (e-health) for remote managing cardiovascular outpatients Time: 6 monthsDescription: patients come into direct contact with the case coordinator, who provides ongoing assistance, including for connecting to devices that ensure real-time data transmission and directing to specialist teams that establish stage diagnosis and management / therapy behavior (including adjustment). doses, decisions to discontinue medication or to add medication);
Measure: Number of patients included in this platform Time: 6 monthsDescription: Will be the number of sessions per patient multiplied with the number of patients included
Measure: Number of consultations/sessions given Time: 6 monthsThe proposed study aims to compare the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of intravenous and subcutaneous Furosemide. Although these regimens are not intended to be bioequivalent, they are both expected to achieve therapeutic plasma levels and induce effective diuresis. The test formulation in this study is a buffered solution, Furosemide Injection Solution at 30 mg/mL at pH 7.4 (range 7.0 to 7.8) and is intended for SC injection according to the instructions in the protocol. A commercial formulation of Furosemide Injection, USP will serve as the reference drug in this study, which will be administered by IV bolus. It contains furosemide 10 mg/mL in solution at alkaline pH of 8.0 to 9.3 and is marketed for IV and IM injection. The primary objective of the study is to estimate the absolute bioavailability of furosemide administered by subcutaneous infusion compared with an equivalent dose of furosemide administered by IV bolus administration.
Description: Maximum plasma furosemide concentration after administration by subcutaneous infusion or IV bolus
Measure: Pharmacokinetic - Cmax Time: 0 to 24 hoursDescription: Area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable plasma furosemide concentration after administration by subcutaneous infusion or IV bolus
Measure: Pharmacokinetic - AUClast Time: 0 to 24 hoursDescription: AUC from time 0 to infinity for plasma furosemide after administration by subcutaneous infusion or IV bolus
Measure: Pharmacokinetic - AUCinf Time: 0 to 24 hoursDescription: Total collected urine volume after furosemide administration by subcutaneous infusion or IV bolus
Measure: Pharmacodynamic - Diuresis Time: 0 to 8 hoursDescription: Total collected urine volume after furosemide administration by subcutaneous infusion or IV bolus
Measure: Pharmacodynamic - Diuresis Time: 0 to 24 hoursDescription: Total sodium concentration in urine after furosemide administration by subcutaneous infusion or IV bolus
Measure: Pharmacodynamic - Natriuresis Time: 0 to 8 hoursDescription: Total sodium concentration in urine after furosemide administration by subcutaneous infusion or IV bolus
Measure: Pharmacodynamic - Natriuresis Time: 0 to 24 hoursBackground: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a tremendous challenge the modern world has never seen before and is overwhelming the capacities of healthcare systems worldwide. Patients with cardiovascular diseases, heart failure in particular, and cardiovascular risk factors seem to be at a very high risk if affected by COVID-19 - and vice versa there are more and more reports of cardiac manifestations with the viral disease. Aim: The purpose of the study is to characterise the clinical course of adult inpatients with COVID-19 and concomitant cardiovascular affection in a worldwide, multicentre PCHF registry. Methods: Retrospective and prospective data analysis. Data on demographic, clinical, selected laboratory, electrocardiography and echocardiography parameters, treatment and outcome will be collected. The principal investigator provides dedicated electronic case report form. The primary outcome is in-hospital mortality. The secondary endpoints will be ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, the need and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular hospitalisation after 3 and 6 months from index hospitalisation, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after 3 and 6 months from index hospitalisation.
Description: All-cause and cardiovascular mortality during index hospitalization.
Measure: In-hospital mortality. Time: Hospitalization period, assessed up to 30 daysDescription: The duration of hospitalization on the intensive care unit.
Measure: The length of stay in the intensive care unit. Time: Hospitalization period in the ICU, assessed up to 30 daysDescription: The total length of stay in the hospital.
Measure: The duration of hospitalization. Time: Hospitalization period, assessed up to 30 daysThe role of ECMO in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and/or acute refractory heart failure) is not yet known. The present study will aim to report the results of the ECMO management of the most severe forms of COVID-19 through the first French ECMO registry.
Description: Hospital mortality
Measure: Hospital mortality Time: up to 90 daysDescription: Mortality Day 28
Measure: Mortality Day 28 Time: Day 28Description: Mortality Day 90
Measure: Mortality Day 90 Time: Day 90Description: Ventilator-free days
Measure: Ventilator-free days Time: Day 28Description: ICU-free days
Measure: Intensive care unit-free days Time: Day 28Description: Hospital-free days
Measure: Hospital-free days Time: Day 28This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study to investigate the efficacy of PB1046 by improving the clinical outcomes and increasing days alive and free of respiratory failure in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at high risk for rapid clinical deterioration, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death. The study will enroll approximately 210 hospitalized COVID-19 patients who require urgent decision-making and treatment at approximately 20 centers in the United States.
Description: PaO2:FiO2 ratio is the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to percentage of inspired oxygen
Measure: Development of ARDS (PaO2:FiO2 ratio < 300 mm Hg) during hospitalization Time: Any time point between injection initiation and Day 28Description: Composite of: Total hospital days, Total ICU days, Total days of ventilator use, Total days of ECMO, Total days of invasive hemodynamic monitoring, Total days of mechanical circulatory support, Total days of inotropic or vasopressor therapy
Measure: Reduction in hospital resource utilization defined as a composite of:total days: in hospital, in ICU, on ventilator, on ECMO, with invasive hemodynamic monitoring, with mechanical circulatory support, and with inotropic or vasopressor therapy Time: 28 days