Developed by Shray Alag, The Harker School
Sections: Correlations,
Clinical Trials, and HPO
Navigate: Clinical Trials and HPO
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug337 | Anti-coronavirus antibodies (immunoglobulins)obtained with DFPP from convalescent patients Wiki | 0.71 |
drug2175 | Interpersonal Psychotherapy Wiki | 0.71 |
drug2543 | Medical Music Wiki | 0.71 |
Navigate: Correlations HPO
There are 2 clinical trials
The purpose of the proposed research is to evaluate whether changes in drinking identity (DI; how much one associates one's self with drinking) can reduce hazardous drinking (HD; heavy alcohol use and negative alcohol-related consequences) among current college students. The study seeks to explore whether manipulating DI among participants will have changes in self-efficacy, craving, and HD. If such an effect can be found, DI may be a mechanism for HD behavior change and will allow researchers to develop and improve interventions aimed at HD behaviors in high-risk young adults.
Description: drinking identity implicit association test (IAT)
Measure: Changes in Implicit Drinking identity Time: will be assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 2 (weeks 1-3) & long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: Alcohol Self-concept Scale; item responses range from -3 to +3; average score on all items is calculated; lower scores represent a better outcome
Measure: Changes in Explicit Drinking identity Time: will be assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 2 (weeks 1-3) & long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: drinking refusal self-efficacy questionnaire
Measure: changes in self-efficacy Time: will be assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 2 (weeks 1-3) & long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: current craving from cue reactivity task; assessed via alcohol urge questionnaire
Measure: cue-related craving Time: Cue related craving will be assessed following the cue reactivity task, which occurs during the third and final lab-based session (technically, the third week of the study)Description: Penn Alcohol Craving Scale; item responses range from 0 to 6; total score on all items is calculated (can range from 0 to 30); lower scores = better outcome
Measure: changes in past week craving Time: will be assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 2 (weeks 1-3) & long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: Modified timeline follow back will assess past daily alcohol consumption (# standard drinks per day); higher consumption = worse outcomes
Measure: changes in alcohol consumption Time: will be assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 2 (weeks 1-3) & long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory (RAPI) will be used to assess alcohol problems; item response options range from 0 to 4; total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores = worse outcomes
Measure: changes in last 3 month alcohol problems Time: Assessed at lab 1 (week1) and 3-month follow up; data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: adapted from RAPI & Young Adult Alcohol Problems Screening Test (YAAPST); item responses are 0 (did not happen) or 1 (happened); higher scores (range from 0 to 10) = worse outcomes
Measure: changes in last two week alcohol problems Time: assessed at lab 2 and 3 (weeks 2 and 3) and at 2 week and 1 month follow up; data will be reported through 1 month follow upDescription: adapted from daily drinking questionnaire; assesses how much individuals think they will drink each day of the next week
Measure: changes in future drinking intentions Time: assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 3 (weeks 1-3); data will be reported through week 3Description: frequency of heavy episodic (4/5 or more drinks for women/men on a single occasion) and extreme binge drinking (at least 8/10 drinks or at least 12/15 drinks for women/men on a single occasion); definitions are from the National Institute of Alcohol and Alcoholism
Measure: changes in frequency of heavy & extreme binge drinking Time: assessed at lab 1 (week 1) &Description: single item about readiness to change one's drinking (from Rollnick, Mason, & Butler, 1999); ranges from 0 to 6; higher scores = more readiness to change one's drinking; higher scores = better outcome
Measure: Changes in Readiness to Change Drinking Time: post-writing (lab 1, lab 2, lab 3) long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: Item developed by Cervone & Shadel; item ranges from 0 to10; higher scores = greater self-efficacy to limit one's drinking; higher scores = better outcome
Measure: Changes in single-item assessing self-efficacy to limit one's drinking Time: will be assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 2 (weeks 1-3) & long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: Important people measure will ask about the 10 most important individuals in one's social network, including whether or not each one drinks; the variables that are derived include the density of drinkers in the network; higher density = more drinkers (worse outcome)
Measure: Changes in social network composition Time: will be assessed at baseline and 3-month follow up; data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: Assessed via the Desire Thinking Questionnaire; response options range from 1 to 4; total scores (range from 10 to 40) indicate amount of desire thinking about alcohol; higher scores = more desire thinking (worse outcome)
Measure: Changes in desire thinking about alcohol Time: assessed at lab 1 (week 1) and long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: Assessed via the smartphone addiction proneness scale; will use total score (sum); response options range from 1 to 4; total scores (range from 15 to 60), higher scores = more addiction proneness (worse outcome)
Measure: Changes in smartphone addiction proneness Time: Assessed at lab 1 (week 1) and long-term follow up (2 week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: item assessing frequency of use and length of time not using; higher frequency of use = worse outcome; higher length of time not using = better outcome
Measure: Changes in smartphone use Time: Assessed at lab 1 (week 1) and long-term follow up (2 week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)Description: State (current) affect will be assessed immediately prior to and after the narrative writing task; two items (one assessing positive affect and one assessing negative affect); item response range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating greater intensity of feeling; affect will be assess each time participants complete the narrative writing task (i.e. lab 1, lab 2, lab 3); no changes in affect are expected
Measure: changes in affect Time: assessed pre-post-writing during lab 1, lab 2, lab 3 (weeks 1-3); data will be reported through week 3Description: Following the narrative writing task (which occurs at each of the lab session), participants will be asked 5 items about what they wrote and imagined; each item will be evaluated separately; response options range from -3 to +3; items assess how vividly they imagined what they wrote; how easy it was to imagine what they wrote; how much writing made them seem their life differently; how plausible what they imagined was; how relatable what they wrote about was; for all items higher scores = better outcomes
Measure: Manipulation check questions about the narrative writing task Time: will be assessed and reported for each of the 3 lab sessions (weeks 1, 2, and 3)Description: Item developed by Cervone & Shadel; item response options range from 0 to 10; higher scores = greater self-efficacy to limit one's smartphone use; higher scores = better outcome
Measure: Changes in single-item assessing self-efficacy to limit one's smartphone use Time: will be assessed at lab 1, lab 2, lab 2 (weeks 1-3) & long-term follow up (2-week, 1 month, 3 month); data will be reported through study completion (3 month follow up)It is expected that large numbers of healthcare workers will experience a broad range of psychological reactions and symptoms including anxiety, depression, moral distress, and trauma symptoms that will cause both significant suffering as well as occupational and social impairment. The purpose of this study is to find interventions which are helpful in treating psychological distress in healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients. There are two phases of the study. All participants will take part in Phase I, which consists of 4 sessions over a two-week period of either a narrative writing intervention or a medical music intervention. Participants will be randomly assigned to the narrative writing intervention or medical music intervention. After Phase I, participants will be re-assessed. Healthcare workers who meet criteria for PTSD will be given the option to participate in Phase II of the study, in which they will be offered a choice between one of two evidence-based treatments for PTSD: Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) or Exposure Therapy (ET). Both treatments are comprised of ten 75-minute sessions scheduled twice weekly. Participants will be allowed to choose a preferred treatment in Phase II. After Phase II participants will complete a final assessment concluding the study. All interventions will be offered using distance technology.
Description: Feasibility assessment will include recruitment defined as number of individuals interested in the intervention.
Measure: Feasibility Indicator: Recruitment (Phase I) Time: BaselineDescription: Feasibility assessment will include: recruitment defined as number of individuals interested in the intervention.
Measure: Feasibility Indicator: Recruitment (Phase II) Time: Post-Phase I Assessment at week 2Description: Feasibility assessment will include enrollment defined as number of participants signing the informed consent form.
Measure: Feasibility Indicator: Enrollment (Phase I) Time: BaselineDescription: Feasibility assessment will include enrollment defined as number of individuals beginning phase II.
Measure: Feasibility Indicator: Enrollment (Phase II) Time: Post-Phase I Assessment at approximately week 2Description: Feasibility assessment will include retention defined as the number of participants completing the full course of Phase I interventions.
Measure: Feasibility Indicator: Retention (Phase I) Time: Post-Phase I Assessment at approximately week 2Description: Feasibility assessment will include retention defined as the number of participants completing the full couse of Phase II interventions.
Measure: Feasibility Indicator: Retention (Phase II) Time: Post-Phase II Assessment at approximately week 7Description: Acceptability and treatment satisfaction will be rated with a Likert scale.
Measure: Acceptability Indicator: Satisfaction (Phase I) Time: Post-Phase I Assessment at approximately week 2Description: Acceptability and treatment satisfaction will be rated with a Likert scale.
Measure: Acceptability Indicator: Satisfaction (Phase II) Time: Post-Phase II Assessment at approximately week 7Description: Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) Score. Total Scores range from 0-80. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Preliminary Efficacy as Measured by Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale Score (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) Score. Total Scores range from 0-80. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Preliminary Efficacy as Measured by Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale Score (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: Scored between 0-21: Cut offs: 0-4 = None 5-9 = Mild anxiety 10-14 = Moderate anxiety 15-21 = Severe anxiety Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in Anxiety Symptoms measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: Scored between 0-21: Cut offs: 0-4 = None 5-9 = Mild anxiety 10-14 = Moderate anxiety 15-21 = Severe anxiety Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in Anxiety Symptoms measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: 21-item self-report measure. Scored between 0-63. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in Depressive Symptoms measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: 21-item self-report measure. Scored between 0-63. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in Depressive Symptoms measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: 24 item self-report measure. 19 questions are evaluated. Each item in the scale is rated between 0 (no distress) and 3 (serious distress). The total PSQI score ranges from 0-21. Sleep quality of the patients with a total score of 5 and below is considered "good". A score of greater than 5 refers to poor sleep quality.
Measure: Change in score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: 24 item self-report measure. 19 questions are evaluated. Each item in the scale is rated between 0 (no distress) and 3 (serious distress). The total PSQI score ranges from 0-21. Sleep quality of the patients with a total score of 5 and below is considered "good". A score of greater than 5 refers to poor sleep quality.
Measure: Change in score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: 21 item self-report measure measuring moral distress (the emotional state that arises from a situation when an individual feels that the ethically correct action to take is different from what he/she is tasked with doing). Score range is 0-336. Higher scores indicate greater moral distress.
Measure: Change in score on the Moral Distress Scale (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: 21 item self-report measure measuring moral distress (the emotional state that arises from a situation when an individual feels that the ethically correct action to take is different from what he/she is tasked with doing). Score range is 0-336. Higher scores indicate greater moral distress.
Measure: Change in score on the Moral Distress Scale (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: 11 item self-report measure that measures moral injury. Statements related to distress or feelings of betrayal related to potentially morally injurious events are rated on a 6 point scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Score range is 11-66, with higher scores reflecting greater moral injury.
Measure: Change in score on the Modified Moral Injury Events Scale (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: 11 item self-report measure that measures moral injury. Statements related to distress or feelings of betrayal related to potentially morally injurious events are rated on a 6 point scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Score range is 11-66, with higher scores reflecting greater moral injury.
Measure: Change in score on the Modified Moral Injury Events Scale (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: The well-validated PCL-5 will assess self-reported PTSD symptom severity. Scores range from 0-80. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in score on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: The well-validated PCL-5 will assess self-reported PTSD symptom severity. Scores range from 0-80. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in score on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: 10 point visual analog scale to rate the extent to which work/school, social life and home life or family responsibilities are impaired by his or her symptoms. The 3 items can be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).
Measure: Change in score on the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: 10 point visual analog scale to rate the extent to which work/school, social life and home life or family responsibilities are impaired by his or her symptoms. The 3 items can be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).
Measure: Change in score on the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. High score shows better result.
Measure: Change in score on the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale - Brief (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. High score shows better result.
Measure: Change in score on the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale - Brief (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: Subjects rate their own social functioning over times on a 5-point scale on items covering work for pay, housework, extended family, parenting, marital status, social activity and leisure, family unit and student status (sub-scales). Mean values of all the sub-scales are used, with a range from 0-5. Higher score = worse outcome.
Measure: Change in score on the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: Subjects rate their own social functioning over times on a 5-point scale on items covering work for pay, housework, extended family, parenting, marital status, social activity and leisure, family unit and student status (sub-scales). Mean values of all the sub-scales are used, with a range from 0-5. Higher score = worse outcome.
Measure: Change in score on the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: The scale is comprised of 140 items total. The measure is comprised of 14 different scales and respondents indicate on a 5-point scale the frequency of a stress-related event.
Measure: Change in Score on the Occupational Stress Inventory Revised (OSI-R) (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: The scale is comprised of 140 items total. The measure is comprised of 14 different scales and respondents indicate on a 5-point scale the frequency of a stress-related event.
Measure: Change in Score on the Occupational Stress Inventory Revised (OSI-R) (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: 12-item scale with a seven-point scale (from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree), resulting in a total score in the range of 12-84. Higher scores indicate higher perceived social support by Friends and Family/Significant Others.
Measure: Change in Score on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: 12-item scale with a seven-point scale (from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree), resulting in a total score in the range of 12-84. Higher scores indicate higher perceived social support by Friends and Family/Significant Others.
Measure: Change in Score on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: 33-item self-report measure is designed to assess the degree to which a participant agrees with thoughts and beliefs that have been found to be common for individuals who suffer from PTSD. The measure is rated between 1 (Totally disagree) to 7 (Totally agree). The score range is 33-231. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in score on the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: 33-item self-report measure is designed to assess the degree to which a participant agrees with thoughts and beliefs that have been found to be common for individuals who suffer from PTSD. The measure is rated between 1 (Totally disagree) to 7 (Totally agree). The score range is 33-231. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Measure: Change in score on the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksDescription: The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a 36-item self-report measure of six facets of emotion regulation. Items are rated on a scale of 1 ("almost never [0-10%]") to 5 ("almost always [91-100%]"). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in emotion regulation.
Measure: Change in score on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (Phase I) Time: Start of Phase I to approximately 2 weeksDescription: The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a 36-item self-report measure of six facets of emotion regulation. Items are rated on a scale of 1 ("almost never [0-10%]") to 5 ("almost always [91-100%]"). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in emotion regulation.
Measure: Change in score on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Phase II) Time: Start of Phase II to approximately 5 weeksAlphabetical listing of all HPO terms. Navigate: Correlations Clinical Trials
Data processed on December 13, 2020.
An HTML report was created for each of the unique drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms associated with COVID-19 clinical trials. Each report contains a list of either the drug, the MeSH terms, or the HPO terms. All of the terms in a category are displayed on the left-hand side of the report to enable easy navigation, and the reports contain a list of correlated drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms. Further, all reports contain the details of the clinical trials in which the term is referenced. Every clinical trial report shows the mapped HPO and MeSH terms, which are also hyperlinked. Related HPO terms, with their associated genes, protein mutations, and SNPs are also referenced in the report.
Drug Reports MeSH Reports HPO Reports