There are 4 clinical trials
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a simplified lopinavir/ritonavir-based therapy will continue to keep the viral load at very low levels after initial treatment with a combination of Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) plus tenofovir and emtricitabine.
- The screening HIV-1 genotype resistance report suggests resistance or possible resistance to the study RTI(s) or lopinavir/ritonavir; Evidence of possible resistance to efavirenz; Presence of one of the following mutations: RT L1001, K103N, V106A or M, V108I, Y181C or I, Y188L, G190A or S, P225H, M230L; Evidence of possible resistance to emtricitabine or lamivudine; Presence of one of the following mutations: RTm184V or I; Evidence of possible resistance to tenofovir; Presence of RT K65R or insertion at codon 69, or Presence of 2 or more of the following mutations: RTm41L, D67N, K70R, L210W; any change at T215, K219Q or evidence of possible resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir; Presence of one or more of the following mutations: protease I47V or A, G48V, I50V, V82A or F or T or S, I84V, 190M or Presence of 3 or more of the following mutations: protease L10F or I or R or V, K20M or R, L24I, V32I, L33F, M36I, M46I or L, F53L; any change at I54, A71V or T, G73S. --- K103N --- --- V106A --- --- V108I --- --- Y181C --- --- Y188L --- --- G190A --- --- P225H --- --- M230L --- --- K65R --- --- D67N --- --- K70R --- --- L210W --- --- K219Q --- --- I47V --- --- G48V --- --- I50V --- --- V82A --- --- I84V --- --- L10F ---
The purpose of this study was to compare the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of once-daily (QD) and twice-daily (BID) dosing of the lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) tablet formulation in combination with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in antiretroviral-experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infected subjects with detectable viral load while receiving their current antiretroviral therapy.
Virologic Response (HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL) at Week 48 for Participants With 0-2 Protease Inhibitor Substitutions at Baseline Associated With Reduced Response to Lopinavir/Ritonavir. Substitutions considered in the analysis were L10F/I/R/V, K20M/N/R, L24I, L33F, M36I, I47V, G48V, I54L/T/V, V82A/C/F/S/T, and I84V as defined in the proposed United States Package Insert.. Percentage of Participants With New Primary Protease Mutations at Week 48. --- L10F ---
Description: A participant was classified as a responder at the first of 2 consecutive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels <50 copies/mL. The participant continued to be a responder until 2 consecutive values >=50 copies/mL were reached, until the final value if that value was >=50 copies/mL, or until discontinuation or death.
Measure: Percentage of Participants Responding at Week 48 Based on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm Time: Week 48 (End of Study)Description: Substitutions considered in the analysis were L10F/I/R/V, K20M/N/R, L24I, L33F, M36I, I47V, G48V, I54L/T/V, V82A/C/F/S/T, and I84V as defined in the proposed United States Package Insert.
Measure: Virologic Response (HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL) at Week 48 for Participants With 0-2 Protease Inhibitor Substitutions at Baseline Associated With Reduced Response to Lopinavir/Ritonavir Time: Week 48 (End of Study)Description: Emergence of new primary protease inhibitor mutations (i.e., mutations at codons 30, 32, 48, 50, 82, 84, and 90 that were not present at baseline).
Measure: Percentage of Participants With New Primary Protease Mutations at Week 48 Time: Week 48 (End of Study)Study the efficacy of Saquinavir/Ritonavir when given in single therapy as maintenance therapy, compared to standard HAART therapies.
- Documented existence of any of the primary mutations in the protease gene or 3 or more of the following: L10F/I/R/V, K20M/R, M36I/V, I54L/T/V, L63P, A71T/V , V82A/F/T/S, I84A/V OR L90M. --- L10F ---
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of the lopinavir/ritonavir tablet when administered in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors to lopinavir/ritonavir tablets when administered in combination with a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 ( HIV-1) integrase inhibitor in antiretroviral naive HIV-1 infected subjects.
Evidence of lopinavir resistance was more conservatively defined as the presence of 1 or more of these mutations: protease I47V or A, G48V, I50V, V82A or F or T or S, I84V, L90M; or presence of at least 3 or more of these mutations: protease L10F or I or R or V, K20M or R, L24I, V32I, L33F, M36I, M46I or L, F53L, any change to I54, A71V or T, and G73S.. Change From Baseline on Physical Component Score of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey. --- I47V --- --- G48V --- --- I50V --- --- V82A --- --- I84V --- --- L90M --- --- L10F ---
Description: A participant was classified as a responder at the first of 2 consecutive visits with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 40 copies/mL. The participant continued to be a responder until one of the following: the participant had 2 consecutive values greater than or equal to 40 copies/mL; the final measurement, if the final measurement was the first one documenting an increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA level to greater than or equal to 40 copies/mL; the participant discontinued participation in the study or died.
Measure: Percentage of Participants Responding (Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid [RNA] Levels Less Than 40 Copies/Milliliter [mL]) at Week 48 Based on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm Time: Baseline to Week 48Description: Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as those occurring after study drug initiation and within 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Treatment-emergent, moderate or severe drug-related adverse events that occurred in at least 2% of participants in either treatment arm are presented.
Measure: Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Severe Treatment-emergent, Drug-related Adverse Events Time: Week 96Description: Potentially clinically significant laboratory values that occurred in at least 2% of participants in either treatment arm are presented.
Measure: Primary Outcome: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Values Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: A participant was classified as a responder at the first of 2 consecutive visits with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 40 copies/mL. The participant continued to be a responder until one of the following: 1) the participant had 2 consecutive values greater than or equal to 40 copies/mL; the final measurement, if the final measurement was the first one documenting an increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA level to greater than or equal to 40 copies/mL; the participant discontinued participation in the study or died.
Measure: Percentage of Participants Responding (Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels Below 40 Copies/Milliliter [mL]) at Each Visit Based on the FDA Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Time of loss of virologic response was defined as the first of the following: first of 2 consecutive visits with plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 40 copies/milliliter (mL), if the participant previously demonstrated 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 40 copies/mL; Study Day 1, if the subject never achieved 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 40 copies/mL; the day of the final measurement, if the final measurement was the first one documenting an increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA level to greater than or equal to 40 copies/mL.
Measure: Time to Loss of Virologic Response - Percentage of Participants Still Categorized as Responders at Day 672 Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Resistance to study drugs was defined as described by the International AIDS Society-USA (IAS-USA) Panel. All participants had an HIV-1 drug resistance genotype (lopinavir/ritonavir, tenofovir, or emtricitabine) obtained at the Screening Visit. Beginning at Week 8, if participant's plasma HIV-1 RNA was greater than or equal to 40 copies/milliliter (mL) and was below 40 copies/mL at the previous visit, additional procedures were undertaken to determine if resistance to study drug occurred.
Measure: Number of Participants Who Developed Resistance to Each Drug in the Study Regimen, as Defined by the International AIDS Society-USA (IAS-USA) Panel. Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Beginning at Week 8, if participant's plasma HIV-1 RNA was greater than/equal to 40 copies/milliliter (mL) and was below 40 copies/mL at the previous visit, additional procedures were undertaken to determine if resistance occurred. Evidence of lopinavir resistance was more conservatively defined as the presence of 1 or more of these mutations: protease I47V or A, G48V, I50V, V82A or F or T or S, I84V, L90M; or presence of at least 3 or more of these mutations: protease L10F or I or R or V, K20M or R, L24I, V32I, L33F, M36I, M46I or L, F53L, any change to I54, A71V or T, and G73S.
Measure: Number of Participants Who Developed Resistance, Defined Conservatively, to Lopinavir Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The Survey is a brief, comprehensive health status measure used in studies of people with HIV/AIDS. Participants rate their health and mental/emotional condition, how much their health limits physical activities (eating, dressing, bathing, climbing stairs, walking one block, etc.) and social activities (for example, visiting with friends or relatives), and other questions that measure quality of life. The physical component summarizes answers to questions about physical status. Possible scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better health, and increases indicate improvement.
Measure: Change From Baseline on Physical Component Score of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The Survey is a brief, comprehensive health status measure used in studies of people with HIV/AIDS. Participants rate their health and mental/emotional condition, how much their health limits physical activities (eating, dressing, bathing, climbing stairs, walking one block, etc.) and social activities (visiting with friends or relatives, etc.), and other questions that measure quality of life. The mental component summarizes answers to questions about emotional and mental wellbeing. Possible scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicates better health, and increases indicate improvement.
Measure: Change From Baseline on Mental Component of Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The Effectiveness Scale of the TSQM evaluates the participant's satisfaction or dissatisfaction (1=extremely dissatisfied to 7=extremely satisfied) with the ability of the medication to prevent or treat the condition, the way the medication relieves symptoms, the amount of time it takes for the medication to start working, and other questions. Scores are converted to a range of 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater satisfaction.
Measure: Score on Effectiveness Scale of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Time: Week 96Description: The Side Effects scale of the TSQM asks if the participant experiences side effects (yes/no), and if so, how bothersome the side effects are, to what extent they interfere with physical health and ability to function (for example, strength and energy levels), to what extent they interfere with mental function (for example, ability to think clearly, stay awake, etc.), and to what extent the side effects affect the participants overall satisfaction with the medication. Scores are converted to a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate less interference and/or less dissatisfaction.
Measure: Score on Side Effects Scale of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Time: Week 96Description: The Global Satisfaction scale of the TSQM evaluates the participants rating of whether the good things about the medication outweigh the bad things (1=not at all certain to 5=extremely certain) and how satisfied or dissatisfied the participant is with the medication (1=extremely dissatisfied to 7=extremely satisfied). Scores are converted to a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Measure: Score on Global Satisfaction Scale of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Time: Week 96Description: Hematocrit fraction is the percentage (%) by volume of packed red blood cells (RBCs) in the participant's blood. It was measured using standard clinical laboratory analysis of participants' blood samples.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Fraction) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL) (Micromoles/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) (Micromoles/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (Micromoles/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose (Millimoles/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Lipase (Units/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Adiponectin (Micrograms/Milliliter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (Nanograms/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate (Millimoles/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-1 (Picograms/Milliliter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-2 (Picograms/Milliliter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Leptin (Nanograms/Milliliter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Included in measures of metabolic toxicity
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Insulin (Picomoles/Liter) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Urine specific gravity is a laboratory test that measures the concentration of all chemical particles in the urine. The measurement produces a ratio of the urine density to water density.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Urine Specific Gravity Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Chest circumference is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen. Participant's chest circumference was measured at 5 cm above the xiphoid process using non-stretchable measuring tape with half centimeter marks.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Chest Measurement (cm) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Waist circumference is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen. Circumference of participant's waist was measured at the level of the navel using non-stretchable measuring tape with half centimeter marks.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Measurement (cm) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Arm circumference is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen. Particpant's arm circumference was measured halfway between the acromial process on the shoulder and the tip of the elbow (olecranon process) using non-stretchable measuring tape with half centimeter marks.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Mid-Arm Measurement (cm) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Hip circumference is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen. Participant was measured at widest width of the hip using non-stretchable measuring tape with half centimeter marks.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Hips Measurement (cm) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: Mid-thigh circumference is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen. Particpant's thigh circumference was measured halfway between the inguinal crease and the midpoint of the upper border of the patella using non-stretchable measuring tape with half centimeter marks.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Mid-Thigh Measurement (cm) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Upper Extremity Fat (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Upper Extremity Lean Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Upper Extremity Total Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Lower Extremity Fat (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in DEXA Scan of Lower Extremity Lean Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Lower Extremity Total Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Trunk Fat (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Trunk Lean Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Trunk Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Total Body Fat (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Total Body Lean Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is included in the measures of somatic toxicity, which is characterized by loss of fat in the face, arms, and legs, and increase in fat in the base of the back of the neck and in the abdomen.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Total Body Mass (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan of bone mineral content was used to evaluate potential bone effects of treatment.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Bone Mineral Content (Grams) Time: Baseline to Week 96Description: The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan of bone mineral content was used to evaluate potential bone effects of treatment.
Measure: Mean Change From Baseline in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan of Bone Mineral Density (Grams/cm^2) Time: Baseline to Week 96