Developed by Shray Alag, The Harker School
Sections: Correlations,
Clinical Trials, and HPO
Navigate: Clinical Trials and HPO
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| drug4928 | eM2M Wiki | 0.38 |
| drug1863 | Heated Vest Wiki | 0.38 |
| drug4738 | WebEx Physical Activity Program Wiki | 0.38 |
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| D016135 | Spinal Dysraphism NIH | 0.38 |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries NIH | 0.25 |
| D002547 | Cerebral Palsy NIH | 0.22 |
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| HP:0002414 | Spina bifida HPO | 0.38 |
| HP:0001264 | Spastic diplegia HPO | 0.22 |
Navigate: Correlations HPO
There are 7 clinical trials
Background Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) have many adverse secondary medical and quality of life (QOL) changes as a result of immobilization. Veterans with SCI who have completed rehabilitation after injury and are unable to ambulate receive a wheelchair as standard of care (SOC) for mobility. Powered exoskeletons are a technology that has recently become available as an alternate form of mobility by providing an external framework for support and computer controlled motorized hip and knee joints to assist with over ground ambulation.
Description: The Veterans RAND 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 36 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific impact on general and selected populations. The items on the questionnaire correspond to eight principal health domains including general health perceptions, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. The outcome in this study is the score from the Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) of the VR-36, which measures the vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health of the participant.
Measure: Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) of the Veterans Rand-36 (VR-36) Time: Change from Baseline Assessment to 4 Months Post InterventionDescription: The Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement tool was developed to assess patient reported outcome measures in persons with SCI. It is comprised of four broad domains of physical-medical health, emotional health, social participation, and physical functioning. Primary Outcome #2 will be a sum of the scores on the Bladder Management Difficulties, Bowel Management Difficulties, and Pain Interference item banks within the Physical-Medical Health domain.
Measure: The sum T-score for the SCI-QOL Physical Medical Health domain (three item banks of Bladder Management Difficulties, Bowel Management Difficulties, and Pain Interference) Time: Change from Baseline Assessment to 4 Months Post InterventionDescription: Total body fat mass as measured by DXA (Dual energy X-Absorptiometry) scan.
Measure: Total Body Fat Mass (Kg) Time: Change from Baseline Assessment to 4 Months Post InterventionPersons with higher levels of spinal cord injury (above the 2nd thoracic vertebrae; tetraplegia) are unable to maintain normal core body temperature (Tcore) when exposed to cool environments. In persons with tetraplegia, even limited exposure to cool temperatures may cause Tcore to approach hypothermic values and impair cognitive performance. Conversely, an increase in Tcore from subnormal to normal range may improve cognitive performance. Prior work has shown that cool seasonal temperatures have an adverse effect on personal comfort and the ability to perform vital daily activities of self-care in persons with tetraplegia. Interventions that address the vulnerability to hypothermia are limited. A self-regulating heated vest designed specifically for persons with tetraplegia is a novel and promising strategy to address this problem. By more effectively maintaining Tcore, the vest can decrease the adverse impact of cool temperatures on comfort, quality of life, and performance of vital daily tasks for Veterans with tetraplegia during the cooler seasons.
Description: Tcore will be continuously monitored throughout baseline and thermal challenge periods (with heated & non-heated vests) by a TX-2 Rectal probe and Iso-Thermex Multichannel Thermometer (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). The probe will be placed 10 cm beyond the anal sphincter.
Measure: Change in Core Body Temperature (Tcore) Time: Visits 2 & 3 (subjects with tetraplegia only): Continuously throughout baseline & Thermal Challenge (2 hrs) periods. The change in Tcore from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.Description: The cognitive battery will be administered once at BL and once after Thermal Challenge in persons with tetraplegia only (Visits 2 & 3). Testing conditions will be identical, quiet, and distraction-free. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): Subjects will be asked to repeat 2-9 numbers forward, backward and in ascending order to assess attention, processing speed, and working memory. Each assessment requires 10 min.
Measure: Change in Cognitive Performance: WAIS-IV Time: Visits 2 & 3 (subjects with tetraplegia only): At the end baseline (at 15 min) & end of Thermal Challenge (at 120 min) periods. The change in cognitive performance from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.Description: Delayed Recall section of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Subjects will be asked to repeat 5 simple words immediately and then recall them after a 5-minute delay to assess working memory. Each assessment requires 6 min.
Measure: Change in Cognitive Performance: Delayed Recall Time: Visits 2 & 3 (subjects with tetraplegia only): At the end baseline (at 15 min) & end of Thermal Challenge (at 120 min) periods. The change in cognitive performance from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.Description: Stroop Color and Word: Subjects will be asked to read words of colors, colors of fonts to assess attention and processing speed; color of fonts of words which describe conflicting colors to assess response inhibition (executive functioning). Subjects will practice each of the assessments for approximately 10 seconds prior to the actual test to ensure understanding of the instructions. Each assessment requires 4 min.
Measure: Change in Cognitive Performance: Stroop Time: Visits 2 & 3 (subjects with tetraplegia only): At the end baseline (at 15 min) & end of Thermal Challenge (at 120 min) periods. The change in cognitive performance from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.Description: Thermal Comfort will be measured every 10 minutes throughout BL and thermal challenge periods by the Zhang 6-point thermal comfort scale: +3 (very comfortable), +2 (comfortable), +1 (just comfortable), -1 (just uncomfortable), -2 (uncomfortable), and -3 (very uncomfortable). A greater frequency of +1, +2, and +3 scores are considered more desirable than -1, -2, and -3 scores during the Thermal Challenge. Each assessment requires only the time needed for the subject to respond (typically less than 10 seconds).
Measure: Change in Thermal Comfort (TC) Time: Visits 1, 2, & 3 (all subjects): During baseline & every 10 minutes throughout Thermal Challenge (2 hrs). The change in TC from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.Description: Skin thermocouples (TX-4 Skin Surface probes, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH) will be taped to 12 sites on the anterior trunk. Tsk data will be collected continuously throughout the baseline (BL) and Thermal Challenge periods. All areas under the vest will have skin temperatures less than or equal to 39 degrees C.
Measure: Change in Skin Temperature (Tsk) under the heated vest Time: Visits 2 & 3 (all subjects): Continuously throughout baseline (15 min) & Thermal Challenge (2 hrs) periods. The change in Tsk from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.Description: Thermal sensation will be measured on the Zhang 9-point Thermal Sensation scale: +4 (very hot), +3 (hot), +2 (warm), +1 (slightly warm), 0 (neutral), -1 (slightly cool), -2 (cool), -3 (cold), and -4 (very cold). TS should be no greater than "warm" this would include identification of "hot spots". Each assessment requires only the time needed for the subject to respond (typically less than 10 seconds).
Measure: Change in Thermal Sensation (TS) Time: Visit 1 (able-bodied subjects only): During baseline & every 10 minutes throughout Thermal Challenge (2 hrs). The change in TS from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.The purpose of this study is to test the effects of an innovative exercise program referred to as movement-2-music (M2M) on health and fitness outcomes in adults with physical/mobility disabilities. One hundred and eight participants with physical/mobility disabilities will be recruited and randomly enrolled into one of two groups: a) M2M or b) waitlist control. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effects of a 12-week M2M program on health and fitness in participants with physical/mobility disabilities who are in one of three functional mobility groups: 1) Group I - only able to exercise while sitting, 2) Group II - able to exercise sitting and standing with/without support, and 3) Group III - able to exercise one side of the body more than the other side. The second aim is to compare the observed effects of the program in this study to a previous M2M study that groups participants based on disability type. The third aim of this study is to test whether adherence (defined as attendance to the 12-week program) affects the effects of M2M in participants with physical/mobility disabilities. The potential influences of different functional mobility and disabilities of participants on how the program affects participants' health and fitness outcomes will also be tested. **In response to COVID-19, the 12-week M2M intervention and all assessments have been modified from being delivered in-person at Lakeshore Foundation to being delivered remotely in real-time through videoconferencing technology.**
Description: The cardiorespiratory fitness is measured using a heart rate recovery test
Measure: Change from baseline cardiorespiratory fitness at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Muscle strength is measured with grip strength using a hand-held dynamometer.
Measure: Change from baseline muscle strength at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Lower extremity function is assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Measure: Change from baseline lower extremity function at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Lower extremity function will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.
Measure: Change from baseline lower extremity function at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Health-related quality of life is measured using the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 Health Items. The instrument is a 10-item measure with the response scores ranging from 1 (very severe) to 5 (none). Two summary scores, a global physical health score and a global mental health score, can be calculated from this scale, with each score ranging from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate better health. The total raw score is translated into a T-score for each participant for analysis.
Measure: Change from baseline health-related quality of life at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Social participation is measured using the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities. The instrument is a 8-item measure with the response scores ranging from 1 (always) to 5 (never). The lowest possible total raw score is 8 and the highest possible score is 40. Higher scores indicate better ability to participate in social roles and activities. The total raw score is translated into a T-score for each participant for analysis.
Measure: Change from baseline social participation at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Physical activity is measured using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire. The questionnaire contains two questions. The first question asks participants to report weekly frequencies of activities they perform at different intensities. A total weekly leisure activity is a sum of activity scores calculated by multiplying the weekly frequencies of strenuous, moderate, and light activities by 9, 5, and 3, respectively. The second question asks participants the frequency of weekly leisure-time activities performed that are long enough to work up a sweat.
Measure: Change from baseline physical activity at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Barriers in physical activity will be assessed using the Barriers in Physical Activity Questionnaire. The instrument contains 43 items. Each item is responded with either no (1) or yes (2). If response is yes, a follow-up response that ranges from 1 (very small) to 5 (very large) is selected. There are 8 domains, which include personal health, attitudes/beliefs towards physical activity, friends, family, fitness center built environment, policy/programs/staff, community built environment, and safety. Each domain score is calculated by summing the item responses with its respective item weight. Higher domain scores indicate greater perceived barriers to physical activity.
Measure: Change from baseline barriers in physical activity at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Exercise self-efficacy will be assessed using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale. The scale contains 8 items, with response options of each item ranging from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (highly confident). All items are summed and a mean score is calculated. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy.
Measure: Change from baseline exercise self-efficacy at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Exercise goal-setting will be measured using the Exercise Goal-Setting Scale. The instrument contains 10 items with response options ranging from 1 (does not describe) to 5 (describes completely). A mean score is calculated. A higher mean score indicate better goal-setting and self-monitoring for exercise.
Measure: Change from baseline exercise goal-setting at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Outcome expectations for exercise will be assessed using the Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale. The instrument contains 15 items, with the response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Three domains of outcome expectations for exercise are assessed, which include physical outcome expectations (6 items), social outcome expectations (4 items), and self-evaluative outcome expectations (5 items). Each dimension is scored by summing the item responses. Higher scores indicate higher levels of outcome expectations for exercise.
Measure: Change from baseline outcome expectations for exercise at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDescription: Social support will be assessed using the Social Provision Scale. The instrument contains 24 items, with the response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). A total score is calculated by summing scores from all items. A higher score indicates a greater degree of perceived support.
Measure: Change from baseline social support at 3 months Time: Baseline and post 12-week interventionDuring the current COVID-19 pandemic many spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation services are limited to emergency management, leaving those living in the community without access to services. Unfortunately, this can lead to negative effects including increase in emotional distress, feelings of isolation, and decreased activity engagement. Due to their limited mobility and greater likelihood of respiratory illness it is imperative to provide alternative forms of activity engagement to reduce their risk for secondary complications. Physical activity has been demonstrate to have numerous benefits for individuals with SCI ranging from enhanced health through prevention of secondary complications to improved subjective well-being. The current study proposes to provide an online physical activity program through web-based videoconferencing to person with SCI to improve overall wellbeing and activity engagement. The program will consist of six weeks of twice-weekly, 45-minute sessions in which an experienced fitness instructor (i.e., wheelchair aerobics) with lived experience and a Kinesiology graduate student will lead online sessions. The sessions will be comprised of a 10-minute warm-up phase, a 25-minute aerobic phase and a 10-minute cool-down phase that will incorporate upper-extremity flexibility exercises and guided meditation. In all cases, remote (i.e., in-home) participant monitoring of physiological signals will be conducted by the instructor to ensure safety of participants. Once the program has been completed, participants will be asked to complete self-report questionnaires related to acceptability, feasibility, and limited effectiveness. Participants will also be asked to complete a brief semi-structured interview examining barriers and facilitators of the program. Participant feedback from the interviews will be used to further develop of the program to meet the needs of the population and develop sustainable approaches for access to care in the community setting through collaborations with community partners (SCI Ontario, National SCI Alliance, Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation). Ultimately, the proposed project aims to improve overall wellbeing and access to health care service for those with SCI during the COVID-19 quarantine.
Description: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
Measure: Treatment Satisfaction Time: 6 weeksDescription: Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Short Form
Measure: Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upDescription: Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Short Form
Measure: Fatigue Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upDescription: Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Short Form
Measure: Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upDescription: Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Short Form
Measure: Positive Affect and Well-Being Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upDescription: Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Short Form
Measure: Pain Interference Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upDescription: Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Short Form
Measure: Resilience Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upDescription: Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Short Form
Measure: Self-Esteem Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upDescription: Fear of COVID-19 Scale
Measure: Fear of COVID-19 Scale Time: Baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 month follow-upPersons with spinal cord injury (PwSCI) are at a greater risk for major health conditions and poorer health outcomes than persons without spinal cord injury (SCI). They often experience a great deal of health needs both on a physiological level as well as a psychosocial level. PwSCI frequently require supports and services to be able to live independently within the community. These services and supports are sometimes difficult to access within the community when the country is operating under regular capacity, in current times with the global COVID-19 pandemic, the challenges for obtaining and accessing supports and services will become much greater. The proposed project aims to identify the specific needs during this time of crisis and to provide referrals and resources to ameliorate those needs by surveying PwSCI in the St. Louis region. The project also hopes to determine if these persons experience isolation during shelter at home orders. PwSCI, who the investigators serve or have served in the past, will be contacted via phone or e-mail once a month for six months and asked to complete a questionnaire that will allow the investigators to track the participant's needs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Description: Instrumental Support refers to the perception that people in one's social network are available to provide material or functional aid in completing daily tasks (such as making meals or providing transportation) if needed. This self-report measure for adults (ages 18 and above) is an 8-item calibrated scale.This study will use the measure to determine if people's instrumental support changes during a pandemic.
Measure: NIH Toolbox Instrumental Support Survey - change in instrumental support Time: Baseline, 3 month and 6 monthDescription: A scale designed to measure one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. Participants rate each of the 3 items as hardly ever (score of "1"), some of the time (score of "2"), or often (score of "3"). The scores for each individual question can be added together to give you a possible range of scores from 3 to 9. The higher the score the more lonely the person will be. This study will use the measure to determine if people feel socially isolated during a pandemic.
Measure: UCLA (University of California - Los Angeles) 3-item Loneliness Scale - change in social isolation Time: Baseline, 3 month and 6 monthDocument and evaluate the impact of societal restrictions due to the pandemic on SCI- and ABI-related disability and functional impairments, and the resultant effects on psychological wellbeing, physical wellbeing and quality of life for those with SCI/ABI.
Description: Fear of COVID-19 Questionnaire
Measure: Change in Fear of COVID-19 Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Ability to Part. in SRA
Measure: Change in ability to participate in social roles and activities Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Depression
Measure: Change in depressive symptoms Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Pos. Affect & Well-Being
Measure: Change in positive affect and well-being Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Anxiety
Measure: Change in anxiety Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Fatigue
Measure: Change in fatigue Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Emotional & Beh. Dyscontrol
Measure: Change in emotional and behavioural dyscontrol Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Satisfaction w SRA
Measure: Change in satisfaction with social roles and activities Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance
Measure: Change in sleep disturbance Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Stigma
Measure: Change in stigma Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: NeuroQol SF v1.0 - Cognitive Function
Measure: Change in cognitive function Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: 23 questions about strategies to social distance
Measure: Change in social distancing strategies used Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsDescription: 22 questions about social distancing
Measure: Change in thoughts and feelings about social distancing Time: baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsPersons with spinal cord injury (SCI) face many challenges as they transition from inpatient care to outpatients and on into the community. With shorter lengths of stay and barriers to coordinating care between SCI specialists and community service providers, the development of self-management skills are an integral part in the effective community reintegration, proper healthcare utilization, management of secondary complications as well as independence and community participation. Based on the best available behaviour change theory, this initiative utilizes an online e-health Platform as a key component of a novel care service delivery model to enhance the development of effective self-management skills. This Platform will be provided to participants receiving care in the inpatient or outpatient programs at Parkwood Institute with the potential to continue its use in the community. Participants will complete surveys prior to, during and following use of the e-health solution. These will assess feasibility, usability, usage analytics and several patient-reported outcomes including self-management-related outcomes, healthcare utilization and prevalence of secondary complications. This platform is especially relevant to our current state of dealing with COVID-19 and the challenges it presents for clinicians and their patients in that it will provide an online solution during a time of physical isolation as well as providing access to tools and resources as people transition back to their home communities following specialized rehabilitation services.
Description: Feasibility will be assessed across 4 subdomains (a) acceptance, b) demand, c) practicality, and d) limited efficacy) by the average scores from a set of 5 point likert-style questions relating to each sub-domain as part of a customized feasibility survey based on the Bowen et al feasibility framework (Am J Prev Med. 2009 May; 36(5): 452-457). The overall feasibility will be represented by the average score across all of the sub-domains.
Measure: Feasibility of the use of the platform across 4 sub-domains including a) acceptance, b) demand, c) practicality, and d) limited efficacy Time: 6 weeks after admission/enrollment (inpatient/outpatient platform access groups), discharge (or 6 weeks after admission if outpatient), and 6 weeks after being provided access to the platform (if Standard Care group)Description: This will be assessed using 4 questions from the Social Roles & Activities - Ability to Participate Short Form 10a which is a subscale in the SCI Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) 1.0 Measurement Tool (Tulsky et al., J Spinal Cord Med. May, 2015; 38(3): 257-269). This is a patient-reported outcome measure involving 5-point, likert-based questions.
Measure: Social Roles & Activities - Ability to Participate Time: Longitudinal measure assessed at baseline and then at discharge (or 6 weeks) and then again 6 weeks later for follow-upDescription: This will be assessed using 1 question from the Independence Short Form 8a which is a subscale in the SCI Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) 1.0 Measurement Tool (Tulsky et al., J Spinal Cord Med. May, 2015; 38(3): 257-269). This is a patient-reported outcome measure involving 5-point, likert-based questions.
Measure: Independence Time: Longitudinal measure assessed at baseline and then at discharge (or 6 weeks) and then again 6 weeks later for follow-upDescription: This will be assessed using 3 questions from the Pressure Ulcers Form 12a which is a subscale in the SCI Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) 1.0 Measurement Tool (Tulsky et al., J Spinal Cord Med. May, 2015; 38(3): 257-269). This is a patient-reported outcome measure involving 5-point, likert-based questions.
Measure: Pressure Ulcer Time: Longitudinal measure assessed at baseline and then at discharge (or 6 weeks) and then again 6 weeks later for follow-upDescription: This will be assessed using 3 questions from the Pain Interference Form 10a which is a subscale in the SCI Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) 1.0 Measurement Tool (Tulsky et al., J Spinal Cord Med. May, 2015; 38(3): 257-269). This is a patient-reported outcome measure involving 5-point, likert-based questions.
Measure: Pain Interference Time: Longitudinal measure assessed at baseline and then at discharge (or 6 weeks) and then again 6 weeks later for follow-upDescription: This will be assessed using 1 question from the Pain Behaviour Form which is a subscale in the SCI Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) 1.0 Measurement Tool (Tulsky et al., J Spinal Cord Med. May, 2015; 38(3): 257-269). This is a patient-reported outcome measure involving 5-point, likert-based questions.
Measure: Pain Behaviour Time: Longitudinal measure assessed at baseline and then at discharge (or 6 weeks) and then again 6 weeks later for follow-upDescription: This will be assessed using 3 questions from the Resilience Short Form 8a which is a subscale in the SCI Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) 1.0 Measurement Tool (Tulsky et al., J Spinal Cord Med. May, 2015; 38(3): 257-269). This is a patient-reported outcome measure involving 5-point, likert-based questions.
Measure: Resilience Time: Longitudinal measure assessed at baseline and then at discharge (or 6 weeks) and then again 6 weeks later for follow-upDescription: This will be assessed using the Secondary Conditions Scale which involves 4-point, likert-based questions to indicate the degree to which a specific condition is a "problem" (Kalpakjian et al., J Spinal Cord Med. 2007; 30: 62-70). There are 16 questions, each one addressing a different condition (e.g., bowel dysfunction, bladder dysfunction, diabetes, etc) that are common in persons with spinal cord injury.
Measure: Impact of Secondary Conditions Time: Longitudinal measure assessed at baseline and then at discharge (or 6 weeks) and then again 6 weeks later for follow-upDescription: This will be assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale which is a series of 5-point likert-based questions across 6 sub-domains including (a) engagement, (b) functionality, (c) aesthetics, (d) information quality, (e) subjective quality and (f) perceived impact (Stoyanov et al., JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3(1):e27).
Measure: Quality of Mobile Application Time: 6 weeks after admission/enrollment (inpatient/outpatient platform access groups), discharge (or 6 weeks after admission if outpatient), and 6 weeks after being provided access to the platform (if Standard Care group)Alphabetical listing of all HPO terms. Navigate: Correlations Clinical Trials
Data processed on December 13, 2020.
An HTML report was created for each of the unique drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms associated with COVID-19 clinical trials. Each report contains a list of either the drug, the MeSH terms, or the HPO terms. All of the terms in a category are displayed on the left-hand side of the report to enable easy navigation, and the reports contain a list of correlated drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms. Further, all reports contain the details of the clinical trials in which the term is referenced. Every clinical trial report shows the mapped HPO and MeSH terms, which are also hyperlinked. Related HPO terms, with their associated genes, protein mutations, and SNPs are also referenced in the report.
Drug Reports MeSH Reports HPO Reports