Developed by Shray Alag, The Harker School
Sections: Correlations,
Clinical Trials, and HPO
Navigate: Clinical Trials and HPO
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug885 | Control Intervention Wiki | 0.38 |
drug4114 | standard chemotherapy Wiki | 0.38 |
drug241 | Anatomic Pulmonary Resection Wiki | 0.38 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug872 | Conjunctival swab and nasopharyngeal swab Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1907 | Lung Cancer Screening Decision Tool Wiki | 0.38 |
drug3782 | anti-CD40 antibody (CDX-1140) Wiki | 0.38 |
drug939 | Covid-19 swab PCR test Wiki | 0.38 |
drug873 | Connected devices measurements Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1620 | IgG test Wiki | 0.38 |
drug3271 | Stereotactic Radiotherapy Wiki | 0.38 |
drug3564 | UCPVax + Nivolumab Wiki | 0.38 |
drug2983 | SBRT Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1125 | EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1281 | FLT3 Ligand (CDX-301) Wiki | 0.38 |
drug1383 | Gam-COVID-Vac Wiki | 0.22 |
drug4034 | placebo Wiki | 0.10 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
D008175 | Lung Neoplasms NIH | 0.84 |
D002289 | Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung NIH | 0.34 |
D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases NIH | 0.27 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease NIH | 0.22 |
D008545 | Melanoma NIH | 0.22 |
D014652 | Vascular Diseases NIH | 0.19 |
D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis NIH | 0.19 |
D008103 | Liver Cirrhosis, NIH | 0.19 |
D051437 | Renal Insufficiency, NIH | 0.17 |
D007676 | Kidney Failure, Chronic NIH | 0.14 |
D009369 | Neoplasms, NIH | 0.14 |
D006333 | Heart Failure NIH | 0.12 |
D029424 | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive NIH | 0.11 |
D017563 | Lung Diseases, Interstitial NIH | 0.11 |
D002908 | Chronic Disease NIH | 0.10 |
D008171 | Lung Diseases, NIH | 0.08 |
D003141 | Communicable Diseases NIH | 0.03 |
D007239 | Infection NIH | 0.02 |
D045169 | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome NIH | 0.02 |
D018352 | Coronavirus Infections NIH | 0.01 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
HP:0030358 | Non-small cell lung carcinoma HPO | 0.44 |
HP:0001395 | Hepatic fibrosis HPO | 0.19 |
HP:0004950 | Peripheral arterial stenosis HPO | 0.17 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
HP:0000083 | Renal insufficiency HPO | 0.17 |
HP:0002664 | Neoplasm HPO | 0.15 |
HP:0001635 | Congestive heart failure HPO | 0.13 |
HP:0006510 | Chronic pulmonary obstruction HPO | 0.13 |
HP:0006515 | Interstitial pneumonitis HPO | 0.11 |
HP:0002088 | Abnormal lung morphology HPO | 0.09 |
Navigate: Correlations HPO
There are 7 clinical trials
Veterans have a high risk of developing lung in comparison to general populations due to their older age and smoking history. Recent evidence indicates that lung cancer screening with low dose CT scan reduces lung cancer mortality among older heavy smokers. However, the rates of false positive findings are high, requiring further testing and evaluation. Preliminary studies report that while some Veterans are enthusiastic about screening, others are highly reluctant. Patient preferences should be considered as part of an informed decision making process for this emerging paradigm of lung cancer control. Effective methods for preference assessment among Veterans have not yet been developed, evaluated, and integrated into clinical practice. The specific aims of this study are to 1) elicit patient and provider stakeholder input to inform the development of a lung cancer screening decision tool, 2) develop a web based Lung Cancer Screening Decision Tool (LCSDecTool) that incorporates patient and provider input, and 3) evaluate the impact of the LCSDecTool compared to usual care on the decision process, clinical outcomes, and quality of life. (5/8/18)-This project involves the recruitment of both Veterans as well as health care providers/leaders. Patient recruitment efforts at both sites will target male and female patients enrolled in a Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) who are eligible for lung cancer screening. Our recruitment goals for patients are 40% African American, 5% Hispanic patients, and 10% women. (10/25/2018) Patient recruitment efforts at both sites will target male and female To Date, 32 Veterans have signed the consent form and completed their portion of the trial (16 at CMCVAMC and 16 at West Haven, CT). To Date, 61 Providers have completed their portion of the trial (18 at CMCVAMC and 43 at West Haven, CT). Enrollment for Phase 1 is complete. Enrollment for Phase 2 will begin in June, 2018.patients enrolled in a Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) who are eligible for lung cancer screening. Our recruitment goals for patients are 40% African American, 5% Hispanic patients, and 10% women. To Date, 9 Veterans have signed the consent form and completed their portion of the trial (9 at CMCVAMC and 0 at West Haven, CT). Enrollment for Phase 2 is ongoing with the intent to complete By November 30, 2018. (01/15/2019) Phase 2 patient recruitment is complete. 18 Veterans have signed the consent form and completed their portion of the trial (12 at CMCVAMC and 6 at West Haven, CT). 14 Providers have completed their portion of the trial (8 at CMCVAMC and 6 at West Haven, CT). Enrollment for Phase 3 will begin in February, 2019. To Date (7/1/2019) Enrollment for Phase 3 is ongoing with the intent to complete by February 28, 2020. To Date, 18 Veterans have signed the consent form and completed their baseline portion of the trial (18 at CMCVAMC and 0 at West Haven, CT). To Date (12/3/2019) Enrollment for Phase 3 is ongoing with the intent to complete by February 28, 2021. A 1-year study extension has been submitted and awaiting approval. To Date, 70 Veterans have signed the consent form and completed their baseline portion of the trial (65 at CMCVAMC and 5 at West Haven, CT). To Date (9/9/2020) Enrollment for Phase 3 has just resumed after being placed on administrative hold since March 2020 due to Covid-19. Secondary Site in West Haven, CT has been replaced by Milwaukee, WI. To Date, 90 Veterans have signed the consent form and completed their baseline portion of the trial (83 at CMCVAMC, 5 at West Haven, CT and 2 at Milwaukee, WI).
Description: Decision regret as measured by a 5-item Decision Regret scale that is patient reported.
Measure: Decision Regret Time: 1 month following interventionDescription: Decisional conflict as measured by a 16 item Decisional Conflict scale that is patient reported
Measure: Decisional Conflict Time: 1 month following the interventionDescription: State anxiety as measured by the State Trait Anxiety Index
Measure: Anxiety Time: 1 month following interventionDescription: Lung cancer worry as measured by a 7 item scale that is patient reported
Measure: Lung cancer worry Time: 1 month after the interventionDescription: Assessed by chart review
Measure: Lung cancer screening uptake Time: 6 months after the interventionPatients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer have been historically treated with surgery whenever they are fit for an operation. However, an alternative treatment known as stereotactic radiotherapy now appears to offer an equally effective alternative. Doctors believe both are good treatments and are therefore conducting this study to determine if one may be possibly better than the other.
Description: Survival estimates will include death from any cause.
Measure: Overall Survival Time: From date of randomization through study completion, up to 10 yearsDescription: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Lung Cancer (LC 13) survey instruments will assess patients' general state of physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being.
Measure: Patient reported health-related quality of life Time: 5 yearsDescription: The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire will evaluate respiratory symptoms, activity limitations from breathlessness, and impact of respiratory function on social and psychological functioning.
Measure: Respiratory Symptoms Time: 5 yearsDescription: The EQ-5D-5L (EuroQOL-5D) survey will measure quality adjusted life years.
Measure: Health State Utilities Time: 5 yearsDescription: Cause of death will be determined by an independent adjudication committee.
Measure: Lung cancer mortality Time: From date of randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to 10 years.Description: Post-treatment surveillance imaging will evaluate patients every 6 months for local, regional, and/or distant disease control.
Measure: Tumor patterns of failure Time: 5 yearsDescription: The Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 second (FEV1) will evaluate an objective measure of breathing function.
Measure: Respiratory Function Time: 5 yearsLung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality both in men and women worldwide. The past few years have demonstrated great progress in the field of tumor immunotherapy through agents that address mechanisms of immune escape notably, so called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICB). Indeed, ICB have emerged as a fatal weapon in the anticancer treatment arsenal. Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies have shown promising results in several cancers including Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. Although such ICB extend patient's survival compared with conventional systemic therapies, they fail to control cancer progression in a significant proportion of patients which can reach up to 50-60% in NSCLC. Recent literature highlights a range of factors involved in the heterogeneous responses and failures to ICB therapies. The challenge is how can ICB treatment efficacy be extended to majority patients? To respond to this question, to increase the success of immunotherapy, immuno-oncology community develops combinations approaches. The aim of these project is to evaluate the efficacy of Nivolumab plus a novel CD4Th1 inducer anti-cancer vaccine in NSCLC patients. Nivolumab (NIVO), which is an anti-PD-1 antibody, has shown promising results in 2nd line treatment for advanced NSCLC. UCPVax is a therapeutic anti-cancer vaccine based on the telomerase-derived helper peptides designed to induce strong TH1 CD4 T cell responses in cancer patients (NCT02818426).
Description: PFS is defined by the duration from the date of initiation of the treatment to the disease progression (RECIST) or death from any cause whichever occurs first, censoring cases without progression at the date of last disease assessment.
Measure: 6 months Progression-Free Survival (PFS) rate Time: 6 months after the date of initiation of treatment (1st day of 1st cycle of chemotherapy)The objective of this protocol is to test the effectiveness of a Jumpstart intervention on patient-centered outcomes for patients with chronic illness by ensuring that they receive care that is concordant with their goals over time, and across settings and providers. This study will examine the effect of the EHR-based intervention to improve quality of palliative care for patients over the age of 65 with chronic, life-limiting illness with a particular emphasis on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). The specific aims are: 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel EHR-based (electronic health record) clinician Jumpstart guide, compared with usual care, for improving the quality of care; the primary outcome is documentation of a goals-of-care discussion during the hospitalization. Secondary outcomes focus on intensity of care: ICU use, ICU and hospital length of stay, costs of care during the hospitalization, and 30-day hospital readmissions; and 2) to conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the Jumpstart intervention, guided by the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks for implementation science, incorporating quantitative assessments of effectiveness, implementation and maintenance and qualitative assessments of clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to future implementation and dissemination.
Description: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who have a goals-of-care (GOC) discussion that has been documented in the EHR in the period between randomization and 30 days following randomization The proportion is the number of patients with GOC documentation over the number of patients in each study arm. Documentation of goals-of-care discussions will be evaluated using our NLP/ML methods. Study staff will manually review and compare findings using a randomly-selected sample of charts using our standard EHR abstraction methods; manual chart abstraction will be the gold standard.
Measure: EHR documentation of Goals of Care discussions Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of ICU admissions during the patient's (index) hospital stay will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care/ICU use: ICU admissions Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of days the patient spent in the ICU during their (index) hospital stay will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care/ICU use: ICU length of stay Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of days the patient spent in the hospital during that (index) hospital stay will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care/Hospital use: Hospital length of stay Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of hospital readmissions between randomization and 30 days following randomization will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care: Hospital Readmissions 30 days Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Secondary outcomes include measures of intensity of care, including utilization metrics: Number of ICU readmissions between randomization and 30 days following randomization will be collected from the EHR using our automated and validated methods.
Measure: Intensity of care: ICU Readmissions 30 days Time: Assessed for the period between randomization and 30 days following randomizationDescription: Costs for intervention vs. control will be reported in US dollars and identified from UW Medicine administrative financial databases. Costs will be reported for total hospital costs and disaggregated costs (direct-variable, direct fixed, indirect costs). Direct-variable costs will include supply and drug costs. Direct-fixed costs will include labor, clinical department administration, and overhead fees. Indirect costs represent services provided by cost centers not directly linked to patient care such as information technology and environmental services. Costs for ED (emergency department) days and ICU days will be similarly assessed.
Measure: Intensity of care: Healthcare costs Time: 1 and 3 months after randomizationDescription: From Washington State death certificates.
Measure: All-cause mortality at 1 year (safety outcome) Time: 1 year after randomizationDescription: Qualitative interviews after individual participation. Interviews will be guided by the RE-AIM and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore the factors associated with implementation (e.g., reach, maintenance, feasibility, inner and outer settings, individuals, and processes of care.) Individual constructs within these domains were chosen to fit this specific intervention and context.
Measure: Key Implementation Factors Time: 3 months after randomizationThis is a multi-centre study on lung cancer patients which experienced COVID-19. Information on clinical features, clinical course, management and outcomes will be collected for both, thoracic cancers and COVID-19 infection. Firstly, investigators will be registered in an online secure registry. After that, a protocol will be developed in order to collect clinical data for the research. It will also include I on the care organization or the perception of the patient and their family members. The final stage will consist on retrospective data collection from patients. So, it is a retrospective study data collection, preceded by prospective data registry.
Description: Describe characteristics and evolution of Spanish patients preferably with lung cancer who contract COVID 19 infection with identification and study of factors of interest, as well as clinical data.
Measure: Clinical data of lung cancer patients with COVID-19 diagnoses Time: From the diagnosis of the COVID until the patient is cured or dies, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 yearsDescription: Describe characteristics and evolution of Spanish patients preferably with lung cancer who contract COVID 19 infection with identification and study of factors of interest, as well as data about diagnosis
Measure: Diagnosis data Time: From the diagnosis of the COVID until the patient is cured or dies, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 yearsDescription: Describe characteristics and evolution of Spanish patients preferably with lung cancer who contract COVID 19 infection with identification and study of factors of interest, as well as treatments received
Measure: Treatments received Time: From the diagnosis of the COVID until the patient is cured or dies, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 yearsDescription: Describe characteristics and evolution of Spanish patients preferably with lung cancer who contract COVID 19 infection with identification and study of factors of interest, as well as prognostic factors.
Measure: Prognostic factors Time: From the diagnosis of the COVID until the patient is cured or dies, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 yearsObservational, retrospective data collection and prospective IgG analysis, and multicenter study. The main objective of the study is th description of the characteristics and evolution of patients with lung cancer who have acquired COVID-19 infection. For the identification of patients who contract COVID-19 infection, the IgG+ blood test by ELISA method will be used.
Description: Description of the characteristics and evolution of patients with lung cancer who have contracted COVID-19 infection.
Measure: Description of the characteristics of patients Time: From the diagnosis of the COVID until the determination of the blood IgGs, up to 10 weeksThe purpose of this study is to test a new way of treating the most common form of lung cancer. The investigators are testing a combination of radiotherapy with two new forms of immunotherapy. This study is testing the safety and effectiveness of this treatment approach as compared to standard treatment options.
Description: Death Any ≥ Grade 3 non-hematological toxicity, with the following exceptions: Grade 3 alopecia, vitiligo, or endocrinopathies controlled by hormone replacement therapy Grade 3 nausea that resolves to ≤ grade 2 with or without treatment within 72 hours Grade 3 vomiting and diarrhea that resolves to ≤ grade 2 with or without treatment within 72 hours Grade 3 fatigue that resolves to ≤ grade 2 within 5 days Grade 3 hypertension in the absence of maximal medical therapy Grade 3 adverse event of tumor flare (defined as local pain, irritation, or rash localized at sites of known or suspected tumor) of ≤ 7 days in duration Grade 3 amylase or lipase abnormalities that are not associated with symptoms or clinical manifestations of pancreatitis. It is recommended to consult with the Principal Investigator for grade 4 amylase or lipase abnormalities Grade 3 clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that are asymptomatic and can be reversed within 72 hours, however: Any Grade 4
Measure: Phase I: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as follows: Time: up to 8 weeks after initiation of study therapyDescription: Length of time that patient survives from time of study registration
Measure: Overall survival (OS) duration Time: From date of registration until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 2 yearsDescription: The clinical benefit rate (CBR) will be defined as the percentage of subjects who achieve best response of confirmed CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) for at least four months.
Measure: Radiographic responses using descriptive statistics Time: From date of registration, assessed up to 4 monthsDescription: Summary statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and range) and the mean change from baseline of linear-transformed scores will be reported for all the items and subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the QLQ-LC13, according to the EORTC scoring manual guidelines. higher scores are a better level of functioning
Measure: Quality of Life using EORTC QLQ-LC13 (quality of Life Questionnaire, Lung Cancer) Time: 1 yearDescription: Summary statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and range) and the mean change from baseline of linear-transformed scores will be reported for all the items and subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the QLQ-LC13, according to the EORTC scoring manual guidelines. Most items are scored 1 to 4, higher scores are a better level of functioning.
Measure: Quality of Life using QLQ-C30 (Quality of Life Questionnaire) Time: 1 yearDescription: Average daily step counts
Measure: Daily step count using descriptive statistics Time: 1 yearAlphabetical listing of all HPO terms. Navigate: Correlations Clinical Trials
Data processed on September 26, 2020.
An HTML report was created for each of the unique drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms associated with COVID-19 clinical trials. Each report contains a list of either the drug, the MeSH terms, or the HPO terms. All of the terms in a category are displayed on the left-hand side of the report to enable easy navigation, and the reports contain a list of correlated drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms. Further, all reports contain the details of the clinical trials in which the term is referenced. Every clinical trial report shows the mapped HPO and MeSH terms, which are also hyperlinked. Related HPO terms, with their associated genes, protein mutations, and SNPs are also referenced in the report.
Drug Reports MeSH Reports HPO Reports