Primary Outcomes

Description: Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to less than[<] 2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.

Description: Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.

Secondary Outcomes

Description: NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left and right limbs. Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) are scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) were scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.

Description: Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to <2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.

Description: Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.

Description: Norfolk QOL-DN:35-item participant-rated questionnaire to assess impact of DN on QOL; Item 1-7:scored as 1=symptom present, 0=symptom absent. Item 8-35: scored on 5-point Likert scale: 0=no problem, 4=severe problem (except item 32: -2=much better, 0=about same, 2=much worse). Norfolk QOL-DN summarized in 5 domains(score range):physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy(-2 to 58), activities of daily living(ADLs) (0 to 20), symptoms(0 to 32), small fiber neuropathy(0 to 16), autonomic neuropathy(0 to 12); higher score=greater impairment, for each. Total score=-2 to138(higher score=worse QOL).

Description: Summated 7 score: composite score included five Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) attributes (peroneal nerve distal motor latency, peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential amplitude) along with Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) obtained in great toes, and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) value. Score was determined through reference to normal values for age, sex and height. Total score range= -26 to 26, where higher score=worse nerve function.

Description: Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviates Score (NTSFnds) included cooling threshold for the lower limbs, heat pain threshold for the lower limbs and HRDB. Total score range= -11.2 to 11.2, where higher score=worse nerve function.

Description: BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared. mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels to compensate for edema formation associated with malnutrition. A progressive decline in mBMI indicated worsening of disease severity.

Description: TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI.

Primary Outcomes

Description: TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI.

Secondary Outcomes

Description: TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The FOI is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI.

Other Outcomes

Description: An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Description: An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. On the basis of intensity, grade 3 was referred as severe, grade 4 as life-threatening and grade 5 as death.

Description: ECHO: investigator assessed test to assess cardiac function. ECHO abnormality criteria: any abnormality, valvular abnormality, pericardial effusion, abnormal regional wall motion, inferior vena cava respiratory variation, posterior (P) left ventricular (LV) wall/septal (S) thickness, right ventricular thickness, ejection fraction, ratio of early (E) diastolic transmitral flow and atrial(A) contraction velocity (E/A), ratio of 'E'to lateral/septal mitral annular velocity (e') (E/e'prime lateral, E/e'prime septal), E deceleration time (DT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT).

Description: ECG: investigator assessed test to assess cardiac function. ECG abnormality criteria: any abnormality, arrhythmia, rhythm, conduction, morphology, myocardial infarction, ST segment, T waves and abnormal U waves.

Description: Holter monitoring recorded heart rhythm. Holter monitoring abnormality criteria: any abnormality, atrial fibrillation/flutter, atrial tachycardia, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), sustained VT and sinus pause.

Description: NIS assessed cranial nerves(nerve 3,6; facial, palate and tongue weakness),muscle weakness (respiratory; neck, elbow(E), wrist(W), finger(F), hip, knee(K) flexion; shoulder, thumb abduction; brachioradialis; E, W, hip, K extension; F spread; toe, dorsal and plantar ankle flexors; toe extensors); score: 0-4, higher score=more weakness, reflexes(biceps and triceps brachii; brachioradialis; quadriceps femoris; triceps surae), index F and great toe sensation(touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position)score:0=normal,1=decreased or 2=absent. Total score=0-244, higher score=more impairment.

Description: NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left and right limbs. Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) are scored on 0 to 4 scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) were scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.

Description: Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to less than [<] 2) in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.

Description: TQOL= sum of all Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) items,a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on QOL of participants with DN; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). Total TQOL score=-2 to 138;higher score=worse quality of life.

Description: Norfolk QOL-DN:35-item participant-rated questionnaire to assess impact of DN on QOL; Item 1-7: scored as 1=symptom present, 0=symptom absent. Item 8-35: scored on 5-point Likert scale:0=no problem, 4=severe problem(except item 32: -2=much better, 0=about same, 2=much worse).Norfolk QOL-DN summarized in 5 domains (score range): physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy(-2 to 58), activities of daily living(ADLs) (0 to 20), symptom(0 to 32), small fiber neuropathy(0 to 16), autonomic neuropathy(0 to 12);higher score=greater impairment, for each. Total score=-2 to 138 (higher score=worse QOL).

Description: NCS: quantitative measures of peripheral nerve dysfunction consists of 5 attributes: peroneal nerve (PN) motor distal latency, PN compound muscle action potential, PN motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, sural nerve sensory nerve action potential. Normal deviates (Z-score) summated into composite score (higher score=worsened nerve fiber function). Z-score is the defined position of the result in normal probability distribution with a mean of 0 and standard deviation (std) of 1 and describes how far a score is (in std) from the mean.

Description: HRDB test was used to evaluate the cardio-vagal response. Participant took a series of 8 deep breaths and average heart rate difference was measured and compared to normative data. The main factor affecting HRDB is age, with older patients showing less heart rate variability. R-R (time between two consecutive R waves in the electrocardiogram) response to deep breathing was reported as the normal deviates (Z-score), the defined position of the result in normal probability distribution with a mean of 0 and standard deviation (std) of 1 and describes how far a score is (in std) from the mean.

Description: BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2). mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels [gram/liter (g/L)]. mBMI was measured as kg/m^2*g/L. A progressive decline in mBMI indicated worsening of disease severity.

Description: SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health and two total scores (physical component summary [PCS] and mental component summary [MCS]. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Description: Echocardiography was used to measure interventricular septal thickness (IVST), posterior left ventricular wall thickness (PLVWT), right ventricular wall thickness (RVWT), left atrial diameter (LAD): anterior-posterior (ant-post), medio-lateral, superior-inferior (sup-inf) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVED), relative LV wall thickness (RLVWT).

Description: Left atrial volume was measured by echocardiography.

Description: Cardiac MRI was done to measure left ventricular (LV) end systolic volume, left ventricle (LV) stroke volume.

Description: Fractional shortening (FS) is the fraction of any diastolic dimension that is lost in systole. Percent of FS was calculated as difference between end-diastolic dimension (EDD) and end-systolic dimension (EDS) divided by EDD.

Description: Cardiac MRI was done to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) which was the fraction of the end-diastolic volume (EDV) that was ejected out of left ventricle with each contraction.

Description: LV mass was calculated from the product of the myocardial volume and specific gravity of heart muscle, estimated by echocardiography. Increased LVM was associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Description: Doppler echocardiography was a procedure which used ultrasound technology to examine the heart. IVRT is the time between the closure of the aortic valve and the opening of the mitral valve. Mitral deceleration time (MDT) was the time taken from the maximum E point wave to baseline. E wave arises due to early diastolic filling.

Description: The diameter at the base of the aortic root, the basal ring, is also called the aortic annulus diameter.

Description: Tricuspid peak velocity was measured by echocardiography.

Description: Systolic right ventricular pressure can be estimated on echocardiography by adding right atrial pressure (RAP) to the trans-tricuspid gradient derived from the tricuspid regurgitation velocity.

Description: Doppler echocardiography was a procedure which used ultrasound technology to examine the heart. Doppler principle was used to measure the mitral peak early (E) diastolic transmitral flow, mitral peak atrial (A) contraction velocity and annular velocities at the lateral and septal areas of the mitral annulus. s': systolic velocity during ejection, e': early diastolic mitral annular velocity, a': late diastolic mitral annular velocity.

Description: Doppler echocardiography was a procedure which used ultrasound technology to examine the heart. Ratio of early (E) diastolic transmitral flow velocity and atrial (A) contraction velocity (E/A) and ratio of the early (E) diastolic transmitral flow velocity to the mitral annular velocity (e') (E/e') were estimated.

Description: LV mass was calculated from the product of the myocardial volume and specific gravity of heart muscle, estimated by echocardiography. QRS score (the sum of QRS voltages in the peripheral leads) was used as an index of "electrical" LV mass.

Description: LA volume index (LAVI), was the value of LA volume divided by body surface area, to measure LA size.

Description: NT-proBNP was a cardiac marker which had the prognostic value for participants with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. Higher level of the marker was indicative of heart damage.

Description: Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants are classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 11 level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks.

Description: Troponin I is a cardiac injury biomarker. Higher concentrations of this marker in blood are associated with heart injury.

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Description: TTR tetramer level for each plasma sample was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay before and after urea denaturation. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) tetramer concentration is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer average concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI. A patient who has the "TTR stabilization" is defined as the patient whose percent stabilization is equal to or more than 32%.

Secondary Outcomes

Description: The NIS provides a total body single score of neuropathic deficits (score range: 0-122, higher score = more deficit), comprising subset scores for cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, and sensation (based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period; each item scored separately for left and right). The NIS-LL is a subscale that provides a score for the lower limbs functions (muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation in great toe) and has a score range of 0-44 (higher score = more deficit). The NIS-UL is a subscale that provides a score for the upper body functions (muscle weakness [including cranial nerves], reflexes and sensation in finger) and has a score range of 0-78 (higher score = more deficit). The components for cranial nerves and muscle weakness are scored from 0 (Normal) to 4 (Paralysis), and those for reflexes and sensation from 0 (Normal) to 2 (Absent). For all items, higher scores indicate greater impairment.

Description: Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire. It consists of 5 domains: Physical Functioning/Large Fiber [score range: -4 - 56] , Activities of Daily Living (ADL) [0 - 20], Symptoms [0 - 32], Small Fiber [0 - 16] and Autonomic [0 - 12]. Total of quality of life (TQOL) score is the sum of all five domains with a range of -4 to 136 (Pfizer Data Standards). Higher scores on each item of the Norfolk QOL-DN TQOL indicate worse quality of life.

Description: The Σ7 NTs nds measures primarily large-fiber function. It is a composite score derived from five NCS attributes (peroneal nerve distal motor latency, peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential amplitude) along with VDT obtained in great toes by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), and HRDB value. It is defined as 7 times the mean of non-missing values of, the five normal deviates of NCS, HRDB, and average normal deviate for VDT of toes. Score was determined through reference to normal values for age, sex, height and abnormalities scored. Total score range is approximately -26 to 26, where higher score=worse nerve function.

Description: The Σ3 NTSF nds measures small-fiber function. It is a composite score defined as 3 times the mean of non-missing values of normal deviates of cooling threshold for lower limbs, heat pain intermediate response for lower limbs, and HRDB. The total score range is approximately -11.2 to 11.2, with a higher score demonstrating worse nerve function.

Description: The mBMI was calculated by multiplying the BMI (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) by serum albumin level (gram/liter). Change in mBMI was calculated as the mBMI at the given week minus the Baseline mBMI.

Description: Ambulatory status was evaluated using walking ability scale in polyneuropathy disability score. The ambulatory status was evaluated as: 0=Good, 1=Sensory disturbances in the feet but able to walk without difficulty, 2=Some difficulties with walking but can walk without aid, 3a=Able to walk with 1 stick or crutch, 3b=Able to walk with 2 sticks or crutches, 4=Not ambulatory, confined to a wheelchair or bedridden.

Description: TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The TTR tetramer level for each plasma sample was measured before and after urea denaturation. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) tetramer concentration is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI. A patient who has the "TTR stabilization" is defined as the patient whose percent stabilization is equal to or more than 32%.

Other Outcomes

Description: Mean plasma concentration of tafamidis at 3 hours after administration

Primary Outcomes

Description: Main characteristics included were education level and employment status which were asked from all participants and caregivers. Type of job (full-time, part-time) was asked only from those participants and caregivers who provided their employment status as employed. Those who were unemployed reported their cause of unemployment, whether it was due to ATTR or not.

Description: Duration of disease was defined as the time from diagnosis of disease until baseline visit. This outcome measure was planned to be assessed for reporting arm of participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: Genetic mutation leads to misfolding of protein transthyretin (TTR) which results in ATTR. In this outcome, number of participants with each type of resulted mutation type (Val30Met, wild type TTR, Phe64Leu, Ser77Tyr, Thr60Ala or other than these) were reported. This outcome was planned to be assessed for reporting arm of participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: TTR protein is primarily synthesized in the liver. Liver transplantation was considered as one of the measure to eliminate the main source of variant TTR. In the study, participants who were diagnosed with ATTR were asked for their liver transplantation status (whether they had transplantation or not). In this outcome measure, number of participants with liver transplant status were reported. This outcome was planned to be assessed for reporting arm of participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: Family history of participants diagnosed with ATTR was assessed to determine whether family history of ATTR was a significant risk factor for ATTR or not. This outcome was planned to be assessed for reporting arm of participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: Mobility, i.e., ability to walk was assessed as a part of loss of functioning in the participants diagnosed with ATTR. In this outcome, number of participants with their different mobility status along with the use of mobility aids (able to walk normally, some problems with feet but able to walk without difficulty, some difficulty walking but can walk without help, confined to bed all the time, need 1 cane or crutch to walk, need 2 canes/crutches or a walker to walk) were reported.

Description: SF-12 was a patient reported outcome survey that represented overall health status by measuring 8 health-related aspects of an individual: Body pain, general mental health, perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations caused by mental condition, role limitations caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Responses on the SF-12 were also used to calculate 2 summary scores: Physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). The score range for each of these 2 summary scores was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), where 100 indicated good health condition.

Description: HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire with 2 subscales; HADS-anxiety scale (HADS-A) and HADS-depression scale (HADS-D). HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.

Description: EQ-5D-3L: participant rated questionnaire to assess generic health status in two parts: single utility score and visual analog scale. For utility score, participants rated their current health state on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression with each dimension having three levels of function: 1 indicates no problem; 2 indicates some problem; 3 indicates extreme problem. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score range of 0.05 to 1.00; higher scores indicating a better health state.

Description: EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess generic health status in two parts: single utility score and visual analog scale. The VAS component rated the current health state on a scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicating a better health state.

Description: The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It was a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days prior to baseline visit. The questionnaire asked about current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work and degree to which a specified health problem (ATTR) or caregiving affected work productivity and regular activities. Percentage of work time missed of participants were recorded and reported.

Description: The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It was a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days prior to baseline visit. The questionnaire asks about current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work and degree to which a specified health problem (ATTR) or caregiving affected work productivity and regular activities. Component scores included percent work time missed due to the health problem; percent impairment while working due to problem; percent overall work impairment due to problem; and percent activity impairment due to problem. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, where higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Description: The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It was a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days prior to baseline visit. The questionnaire asked about current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work and degree to which a specified health problem (ATTR) or caregiving affected work productivity and regular activities. Component scores included percent work time missed due to the health problem; percent impairment while working due to problem; percent overall work impairment due to problem; and percent activity impairment due to problem. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, where higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Description: The WPAI assesses work productivity and impairment. It was a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days prior to baseline visit. The questionnaire asks about current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work and degree to which a specified health problem (ATTR) or caregiving affected work productivity and regular activities. Component scores included percent work time missed due to the health problem; percent impairment while working due to problem; percent overall work impairment due to problem; and percent activity impairment due to problem. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, where higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Description: Healthcare resources use survey of participants diagnosed with ATTR and caregivers was assessed by questions concerning a variety of different types of treatment and resources including outpatient visits to healthcare providers, hospitalizations, emergency/urgent care visits, symptomatic treatments, and out-of-pocket costs (for example, costs of travel to receive care).

Description: Healthcare resources use survey of participants diagnosed with ATTR and caregivers was assessed by questions concerning a variety of different types of treatment and resources including outpatient visits to healthcare providers, hospitalizations, emergency/urgent care visits, symptomatic treatments, and out-of-pocket costs (for example, costs of travel to receive care).

Description: Healthcare resources use survey of participants diagnosed with ATTR and caregivers was assessed by questions concerning a variety of different types of treatment and resources including outpatient visits to healthcare providers, hospitalizations, emergency/urgent care visits, symptomatic treatments, and out-of-pocket costs (for example, costs of travel to receive care).

Description: Healthcare resources use survey of participants diagnosed with ATTR was assessed by questions concerning a variety of treatments and resources included outpatient visits to healthcare providers, hospitalizations, emergency/urgent care visits, symptomatic treatments, and out-of-pocket costs. Number of participants (diagnosed with ATTR) who visited non-medical practitioners (nutrition consultant/dietician, chiropractor, acupuncturist, massage therapist, occupational therapist or other than these) for symptomatic treatments were reported.

Description: Healthcare resources use survey of participants diagnosed with ATTR was assessed by questions concerning a variety of treatments and resources included outpatient visits to healthcare providers, hospitalizations, emergency/urgent care visits, symptomatic treatments, and out-of-pocket costs. Number of visits of participants (diagnosed with ATTR) who visited non-medical practitioners (nutrition consultant/dietician, chiropractor, acupuncturist, massage therapist, occupational therapist or other than these) for symptomatic treatments were reported.

Description: Healthcare resources use survey of participants diagnosed with ATTR was assessed by questions concerning a variety of treatments and resources included outpatient visits to healthcare providers, hospitalizations, emergency/urgent care visits, symptomatic treatments, and out-of-pocket costs (expenditure on nutritional supplements, non-prescription medications and travel to receive medical care).

Description: Participants diagnosed with ATTR rated their pain due to the health condition based on 3 items: pain right now, average pain in the past week, and worst pain in the past week prior to baseline visit. All 3 items were rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0=none to 10=severe pain, where higher scores indicated severe pain.

Description: Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of neuropathy on the quality of life of participants diagnosed with ATTR. Scoring was based on 35 questions that yield a TQOL as well as 5 subscale scores: activities of daily living, large fiber neuropathy/physical functioning, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, and symptoms. TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed only for the reporting arm of participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of neuropathy on the quality of life of participants diagnosed with ATTR. It was summarized in 5 domains: (1) Activities of daily living (score ranges from 0 to 20, where higher score=worse quality of life); (2) Large fiber neuropathy/physical functioning (score ranges from -2 to 58, where higher score=worse condition); (3) Small fiber neuropathy (score ranges from 0 to 16, where higher score=worse condition); (4) Autonomic neuropathy (score ranges from 0 to 12, where higher score=worse condition) and (5) Symptoms (score ranges from 0 to 32, where higher score=less symptoms of disease). Total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life. This outcome measure was analyzed only for the participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: KCCQ was a 23-item participant-completed questionnaire that assessed health status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with heart failure. It was quantified in to following 10 summary scores: physical limitation, symptom frequency, symptom severity, and symptom stability, total symptoms, quality of life, social interference, self-efficacy, overall summary and clinical summary. Each summary score was scaled to range from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with higher scores representing greater disability. Total score ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated better functioning, fewer symptoms, and better disease specific quality of life.

Description: ZBI was a 22-item questionnaire designed to evaluate five broad aspects of caregiver burden in terms of personal and role strain associated with caregiving. Five broad aspects were: burden in the relationship, emotional well-being, social and family life, finances, loss of control over one's life. Each item rated on a 5 point scale anchored at 0 for "never" and 4 for "nearly always." Total score ranges from 0-88 with higher scores indicating increased burden of care.

Description: A questionnaire designed to evaluate aspects of caregiver burden in terms of personal and role strain associated with caregiving. Total score of ZBI scale ranges from 0-88 with higher scores indicating increased burden of care. Five subscale scores were also calculated: (1) Burden in the relationship (consist of 6-items, ranging from 0 to 24 where higher scores indicating increased burden in relationship); (2) Emotional well-being (consisting of 7-items, ranging from 0 to 28 where higher scores indicating worse condition; (3) Social and family life (consisting of 4-items, ranging from 0 to 16 where higher scores indicating worse life condition); (4) Finances (consisting of a single item, scored from 0 to 4 where higher scores indicating worse financial condition); and (5) Loss of control over one's life (consisting of 4-items, ranging from 0 to 16 where higher scores indicating worse control over life).

Description: Caregivers completed a series of questions related to the number of hours per week spent on providing care and support to the participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: Caregivers completed a series of questions related to the loss in their working time while providing care and support to the participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Description: Caregivers completed a series of questions related to the total cost spent on providing healthcare support to participants diagnosed with ATTR.

Primary Outcomes

Description: Dry Blood Spot (DBS) samples will be genetically validated via combination of Next-Generation Sequencing (the mutation will be confirmed by Sanger sequencing) and the Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) of TTR gene

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Samples carrying a mutation in the TTR gene will be biochemically analyzed via liquid chromatography multiple reaction monitoring MS and compared with a merged control cohort, in order to establish TTR mutation-specific biomarker/s.

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Description: Rate of amyloidogenic TTR mutation in progressive idiopathic polyneuropathy

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Rate of amyloidogenic TTR mutation in different subgroups of patients with neuropathy : disabling neuropathy (including ataxic).

Description: Rate of amyloidogenic TTR mutation in different subgroups of patients with neuropathy :variant Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)

Description: Rate of amyloidogenic TTR mutation in different subgroups of patients with neuropathy : upper limb onset neuropathy.

Primary Outcomes

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for each region of interest such as blood pool left atrium, blood pool left ventricle, blood pool right ventricle, left ventricle wall - high uptake, left ventricle wall - low uptake, mid septum - high uptake and mid septum - low uptake. Peak SUV values derived from PET images has been presented. All treated population consisted of all participants who received at least one Anti-SAP treatment including 89Zr-GSK2398852.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for each region of interest such as blood pool left atrium, blood pool left ventricle, blood pool right ventricle, left ventricle wall - high uptake, left ventricle wall - low uptake, mid septum - high uptake and mid septum - low uptake. Peak SUV values derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV in focal anatomical regions of the heart was planned to be measured.

Description: SUV in focal anatomical regions of the heart was planned to be measured.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight.

Description: SUV of whole heart was planned to be measured.

Description: SUV of whole heart was planned to be measured.

Secondary Outcomes

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for each region of interest such as abdominal skin and skin of the back. Mean SUV derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for thyroid gland-goitre hotspot. Mean SUV derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for each region of interest such as thyroid gland-goitre hotspot, abdominal skin and skin of the back. Mean SUV derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV of focal radioactivity uptake for different organs/tissues was planned to be measured.

Description: SUV of focal radioactivity uptake for different organs/tissues was planned to be measured.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for each region of interest such as adrenal gland, aorta, bone marrow, kidney, liver, spleen, abdominal region, brain, lung, parotid gland, and thigh. Mean SUV derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for thyroid gland-goitre. Mean SUV derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for testes. Mean SUV derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV was measured radioactivity concentration corrected for radioactive decay and normalized for administered amount of radioactivity per body weight. SUV was analyzed for each region of interest such as adrenal gland, aorta, bone marrow, kidney, liver, spleen, abdominal region, brain, lung, parotid gland, thigh, and thyroid gland- goitre. Mean SUV derived from PET images has been presented.

Description: SUV of total radioactivity uptake for different organs/tissues was planned to be measured.

Description: SUV of total radioactivity uptake for different organs/tissues was planned to be measured.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of total mAb (unlabelled GSK2398852 and 89Zr-GSK2398852). PK Population consisted of all participants from the All Treated Population for whom a PK sample was obtained and analyzed.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb (unlabelled GSK2398852 and 89Zr-GSK2398852).

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb (unlabelled GSK2398852 and 89Zr-GSK2398852).

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb (unlabelled GSK2398852 and 89Zr-GSK2398852).

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb (unlabelled GSK2398852 and 89Zr-GSK2398852).

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb (unlabelled GSK2398852 and 89Zr-GSK2398852).

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of total mAb.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was measured using scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was planned to be measured by scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was measured using scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was planned to be measured by scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was measured using scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was planned to be measured by scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was measured using scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was planned to be measured by scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was measured using scintillation counter.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for measurement of radioactivity. Radioactivity reflected the total concentration of 89Zr-GSK2398852 and its radioactive metabolites. Plasma radioactive concentration was planned to be measured by scintillation counter.

Description: An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events which may require medical or surgical intervention. Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of GSK2315698, GSK2398852 or 89Zr-GSK2398852.

Description: An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events which may require medical or surgical intervention.

Description: Rash was graded as Grade 1 to Grade 4 based on symptoms and body surface area (BSA) affected; Grade 1: <10 percent (%) BSA and asymptomatic; Grade 2: 10-30% BSA and/or mild symptoms (pain, itch and burning); Grade 3: >30% BSA and/or moderate/severe symptoms (pain, itch and burning); and Grade 4: any rash with mucosal or systemic involvement (such as evidence of renal involvement).

Description: Rash was planned to be graded as Grade 1 to Grade 4 based on symptoms and BSA affected; Grade 1: <10% BSA and asymptomatic; Grade 2: 10-30% BSA and/or mild symptoms (pain, itch and burning); Grade 3: >30% BSA and/or moderate/severe symptoms (pain, itch and burning); and Grade 4: any rash with mucosal or systemic involvement (such as evidence of renal involvement).

Description: The number of participants with any cardiovascular AEs i.e. any AE coded to the cardiovascular system organ class are presented.

Description: The number of participants with any cardiovascular AEs i.e. any AE coded to the cardiovascular system organ class were planned to be reported.

Description: Number of participants with any infusion related reactions are presented.

Description: Number of participants with any infusion related reactions were planned to be reported.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the troponin T and NT-ProBNP at indicated time points. Baseline was considered as the latest assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the troponin T and NT-ProBNP at indicated time points. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: 12-lead ECGs were measured in a semi-supine position using an automated ECG machine after approximately 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Abnormal findings were categorized as clinically significant (CS) and not clinically significant (NCS). Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.

Description: 12-lead ECGs were planned to be measured in a semi-supine position using an automated ECG machine after approximately 5 minutes of rest for the participant.

Description: Continuous inpatient cardiac monitoring was performed via remote cardiac telemetry device. Abnormal findings were categorized as CS and NCS. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.

Description: Continuous inpatient cardiac monitoring was planned to be performed via remote cardiac telemetry device.

Description: Continuous outpatient cardiac monitoring was performed via remote cardiac bodyguardian telemetry device. Abnormal findings were categorized as CS and NCS. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.

Description: Continuous outpatient cardiac monitoring was planned to be performed via remote cardiac bodyguardian telemetry device.

Description: SBP and DBP were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) ranges for the SBP and DBP were as follows: SBP- <90 and >180 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), and DBP- <30 and >110 mmHg.

Description: SBP and DBP were planned to be measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant.

Description: Temperature was measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Normal range for temperature was as follows: temperature- >37.5 degree celsius.

Description: Temperature was planned to be measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant.

Description: Respiratory rate was measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. Normal range for the respiratory rate was as follows: respiratory rate- <12 and >25 breaths per minute.

Description: Respiratory rate was planned to be measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant.

Description: Pulse rate were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant. PCI range for the pulse rate was as follows: pulse rate- <35 and >140 beats per minute (bpm).

Description: Pulse rate was planned to be measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest for the participant.

Description: A full and brief physical examination was performed, including assessments of the skin, lungs, cardiovascular system and abdomen (liver and spleen).

Description: A full and brief physical examination was planned to be performed, including assessments of the skin, lungs, cardiovascular system and abdomen (liver and spleen).

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the hematology parameters.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Hematocrit. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the hematology parameter.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Hemoglobin. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the hematology parameter.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the hematology parameter.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the hematology parameter.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the hematology parameters: Erythrocytes and Reticulocytes. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the hematology parameters.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: Glucose, Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and Urea. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the chemistry parameters.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: Albumin and Protein. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the chemistry parameters.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: ALP, ALT and AST. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the chemistry parameters.

Description: Blood samples were collected to analyze the chemistry parameters: Direct Bilirubin, Bilirubin, Creatinine. Baseline was considered as the latest pre-dose assessment prior to first administration of either study drug, i.e. GSK2315698 or anti-SAP mAb (labelled or unlabelled) (Day 1, Pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Description: Blood samples were planned to be collected to analyze the chemistry parameters.

Description: Urine samples were collected to analyze urinalysis parameters including glucose, protein, blood and ketones.

Description: Urine samples were collected to analyze urinalysis parameters including specific gravity and potential of hydrogen.

Description: Urine samples were planned to be collected to analyze the urinalysis parameters.

Description: Urine samples were planned to be collected to analyze the urinalysis parameters.

HP:0011034: Amyloidosis

Genes 30

Protein Mutations 20

SNP 0

HP:0001271: Polyneuropathy

Genes 59

Protein Mutations 24

SNP 3

HP:0001149: Lattice corneal dystrophy

Genes 6

Protein Mutations 1

SNP 0

HP:0011024: Abnormality of the gastrointestinal tract

Genes 2049

Protein Mutations 2

SNP 1

HP:0001638: Cardiomyopathy

Genes 730

Protein Mutations 9

SNP 18

HP:0002615: Hypotension

Genes 118

Protein Mutations 1

SNP 0

HP:0001635: Congestive heart failure

Genes 246

Protein Mutations 13

SNP 0

HP:0001278: Orthostatic hypotension

Genes 43

Protein Mutations 1

SNP 0