The principal objective is to evaluate the antiviral efficacy of 48 weeks treatment with the
two-drugs combination dolutegravir(Tivicay®) and lamivudine(TEpivir®) in HIV-1 infected
patients virologically suppressed with triple HAART.
Inclusion Criteria:
- HIV-1 infected patient
- Age ≥ 18 years
- CD4 cell count nadir > 200/mm3
- Genotype on pre-HAART interpreted with the last version of the ANRS AC11 resistance
group's algorithm which presents:
- no major mutation on protease among: D30N, V32I, M46I/L, I47A/V, G48V, I50L/V,
154M/L, L76V, V82A/F/T/S, I84V, N88D/S, L90M,- no mutation on RT (except the
mutation A98S if the patient is not infected by the virus subtype C),
- no mutation on integrase (if the genotype is available),
- First-line treatment with suppressive triple HAART (2 NRTI + either 1 PI/r, 1 NNRTI or
1 INI). --- D30N ---
Primary Outcomes
Description: Virological failure is defined by plasma HIV RNA > 50 cp/mL on 2 following samples at 2 to 4 weeks apart.
Measure: Virological success without any intercurrent event leading to interrupt the strategy of the trial (analysis) Time: from week 8 to week 56 (± 4 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes
Description: Evaluation was calculated as the CD4 count at the corresponding week minus the baseline CD4 count
Measure: Evolution of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes count (analysis) Time: from week 8 to week 32 and week 56 Measure: Percentage of participants who discontinued the strategy of the trial for toxicity or with adverse event of grade 3 or 4 (analysis) Time: week 56 Measure: Profile of resistance mutations in plasma in case of virological failure Time: week 56 Measure: Percentage of participants with plasma HIV RNA < 1 cp/mL Time: Day 0, week 8, week 32 and week 56
Description: Influence of total DNA at Day 0 on the occurrence of virological failure or blip
Measure: Influence of total DNA on the occurrence of virological failure or blip Time: from Day 0 to week 56 Measure: Measure of concentrations of dolutegravir(Tivicay®) and lamivudine(Epivir®) in case of virological failure or with a blip Time: week 56 Measure: Measure of adherence to treatment (self-reported) Time: Day 0, week 4, week 8, week 32 and week 56 Measure: Measure of quality of life (self-reported) Time: Day 0, week 8 and week 56
Description: Evaluation of medico-economic aspects. Evaluate the direct medical cost related to dolutegravir and lamivudine versus the cost of the previous treatment.
Measure: Comparison of Medico-economic substudy (analysis) Time: week 56
Description: Measure of concentrations of dolutegravir and NRTI, and HIV RNA in semen at Week 8 and Week 32 in a subgroup of 20 participants
Measure: Sperm substudy measure of concentration Time: Week 8 and week 32
The purpose of this study is to evaluate antiretroviral activity of up to five different oral
doses administered for two weeks of bevirimat versus placebo in HIV treatment experienced
patients, who have documented genotypic resistance to at least one major mutation from the
IAS-USA list (2007)of resistance mutations for NRTIs, NNRTIs, or PIs. Patients will also be
monitored for side effects, and the pharmacokinetics of bevirimat will be determined.
The purpose of this study is to look at the safety and efficacy of a combination of 3 new
antiretroviral drugs: darunavir, etravirine and MK-0518 (raltegravir) in patients who have
multi-resistant viruses and limited treatment options. An optimized background regimen that
may include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and enfuvirtide can be added,
if possible, to this combination. Patients will undergo treatment for 48 weeks and
virological efficacy will be evaluated at week 24.
- Genotypic resistance testing at the screening visit:
- Protease inhibitor mutations: over or equal to 3 primary protease inhibitor
mutations among: D30N, V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I47A/V, G48V, I50L/V, I54M, L76V,
V82A/F/L/T/S, I84V, N88S and L90M (IAS list 2006) but below or equal to 3
mutations among the following: V11I, V32I, L33F, I47V, I50V, I54L/M, G73S, L76V,
I84V et L89V (virus sensitivity to darunavir/ritonavir).
- Reverse transcriptase mutations: over or equal to 3 NRTI mutations (among IAS
list) and below or equal to 3 mutations among: A98G, L100I, K101Q/P/E,
K103H/N/S/T, V106A/M, V108I, E138G/K/Q, V179D/E/F/G/I, Y181C/I/V/C/H/L,
Y188C/H/L, G190A/C/E/Q/S, P225H, F227C/L, M230I/L, P236L, K238N/T and Y318F
(virus sensitivity to etravirine)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non effective barrier contraception in women of child bearing potential
- Pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding
- Opportunistic infection at the acute phase
- Decompensated cirrhosis (stage B or C of Child-Pugh score)
- Malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- Contraindicated medications being taken by the patient (listed in protocol)
- Allergy to the active substances and expedients of darunavir, etravirine and
raltegravir. --- D30N ---
Primary Outcomes
Measure: Proportion of patients with HIV RNA levels of less than 50 copies/ml in an intent to treat analysis at week 24 Time: week 24
Secondary Outcomes
Measure: Proportions of patients with HIV RNA levels of less than 50 copies/ml at week 48, with HIV RNA levels of less than 400 copies/ml at weeks 24 and 48 Time: week 24 and 48 Measure: HIV RNA level evolution between baseline and week 48 Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: HIV proviral DNA and 2LTR circle HIV DNA between baseline and week 48 Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: Number and type of resistance mutations in case of virologic failure occurrence Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: CD4 lymphocyte count and proportion evolution between baseline and week 48 Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: HIV infection progression Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: Frequency of the study regimen modifications and interruption Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: Study regimen tolerance Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: Study regimen adherence Time: from week 0 to 48 Measure: Association between study drugs' minimum concentrations at week 4 and week 12 and virologic success at week 24 Time: from week 4 to 24 Measure: Evolution of pharmacokinetics parameters of study drugs in the PK substudy Time: betwwen week 1 and 4
This study will assess the efficacy of subsequent protease inhibitor (PI)-containing therapy
in subjects who have acquired HIV-1 protease mutations whilst receiving a GW433908
(fosamprenavir)-containing regimen.
The purpose of this study is to determine the antiviral activity, safety and tolerability of
TMC114, formulated as an oral tablet, and administered with a low dose of ritonavir
NCT00650832
Conditions
HIV
Interventions
Drug: TMC114; darunavir; Prezista
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with documented HIV-1 infection
- Patients receiving a PI-containing regimen at screening initiated at least 8 weeks
prior to screening with plasma HIV-1 RNA > 1000 copies/mL
- Prior use of more than 1 NRTI for at least 3 months in total
- Prior use of one or more NNRTIs (investigational included) as part of a failing
regimen
- Patients having at least 1 primary PI mutation at screening as defined by the IAS
guidelines (D30N, M46I/L, G48V, I50V/L, V82A/F/T/S, I84V, L90M)16
- patients experienced to at least one PI for a total period of at least 3 months
- Patients voluntarily signs the informed consent form
- Patients can comply with the protocol requirements
- Patients having a general medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, does
not interfere with the assessments and the completion of the trial. --- D30N ---
Primary Outcomes
Measure: The primary objective of the trial is to compare all TMC114/RTV dose groups with control at Week 24 (the primary endpoint) by means of the confirmed virologic response, defined as a drop in viral load of at least 1 log10 versus baseline.
Secondary Outcomes
Measure: To evaluate safety and tolerability over 24 to 144 weeks; To evaluate the durability of the antiviral activity; To investigate the dose-response by comparing the different TMC114/RTV dosages.
This study proposes to evaluate a pre-DHHS guideline of HAART initiation and then
de-intensification management strategy in adolescents with mild immunosuppression and compare
changes in CD4% from baseline to week 48 and then during de-intensification.
NCT00491556
Conditions
HIV Infections
Interventions
Procedure: Early Initiation of Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy
The following genotypic
mutations exclude subjects from participation in ATN 061: Major ATV mutations I50L;
I84V; N88D/S, Major PI mutations including: D30N; V32I; L33I/F/V; M46I/L; I47V/A;
G48V; I50V/L; I54V/L/A/M/T/S; L76V; V82A/F/T/S/L; L90M, Any major PI mutation as
defined by the most current IAS-USA Drug Resistance Mutations Figures that would
adversely affect a subject's future PI choices, Major RT mutations: Q151M and 69
insertion complex; Decisions regarding the selection of an NRTI backbone for subjects
with NRTI resistance mutations other than those described above will be made by the
site PI in consultation with the protocol chair or his designee. --- I50L --- --- I84V --- --- N88D --- --- D30N ---
Primary Outcomes
Measure: Difference in CD4+ T Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: Week 0 and Week 48 Measure: Difference in CD4+ T Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes
Measure: Difference in CD4+ T Cell Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ T Cell Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ Naïve T Cell Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ Naïve T Cell Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ Termed Central Memory (TCM) Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ TCM Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ Effector Memory (TEM)Ro Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ TEMRo Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ TEMRa Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD4+ TEMRa Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ Naïve T-Cell Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ Naïve T-Cell Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ TCM Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ TCM Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ TEMRo Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ TEMRo Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ TEMRa Count Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8+ TEMRa Count Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve CD28 Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve CD28 Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve CD38 Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve CD38 Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve CD57 Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve CD57 Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve T-Cell Percentage Expressing Human Leukocyte Antigen-D Related (HLA-DR) Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 Naïve T-Cell Percentage Expressing HLA-DR Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM CD28 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM CD28 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM CD38 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM CD38 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM CD57 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM CD57 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TCM HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD28 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD28 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD38 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD38 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD57 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD57 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRO HLADR Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRo HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD28 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD28 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD38 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD38 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD57 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD57 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 Time: 48 weeks Measure: Difference in CD8 TEMRa HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152 Time: 152 weeks