Developed by Shray Alag, The Harker School
Sections: Correlations,
Clinical Trials, and HPO
Navigate: Clinical Trials and HPO
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug3789 | artus Influenza A/B RT-PCR Test Wiki | 0.58 |
drug964 | DAS181 COVID-19 Wiki | 0.58 |
drug965 | DAS181 OL Wiki | 0.58 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug1994 | Medical/surgical mask Wiki | 0.58 |
drug1162 | Eicosapentaenoic acid gastro-resistant capsules Wiki | 0.58 |
drug2118 | N95 Respirator Wiki | 0.58 |
drug1403 | Glucose tablets Wiki | 0.58 |
drug369 | Azithromycin 500Mg Oral Tablet Wiki | 0.58 |
drug1532 | Hydroxychloroquine 200 Mg Oral Tablet Wiki | 0.41 |
drug963 | DAS181 Wiki | 0.24 |
drug2505 | Placebo Wiki | 0.03 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
D003384 | Coxsackievirus Infections NIH | 0.58 |
D000257 | Adenoviridae Infections NIH | 0.33 |
D018357 | Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections NIH | 0.20 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
HP:0011947 | Respiratory tract infection HPO | 0.11 |
Navigate: Correlations HPO
There are 3 clinical trials
Despite widespread use of respiratory protective equipment in the U.S. healthcare workplace, there is very little clinical evidence that respirators prevent healthcare personnel (HCP) from airborne infectious diseases. Scientific investigation of this issue has been quite complicated, primarily because the use of respirators has become "the standard of care" for protection against airborne diseases in some instances, even without sufficient evidence to support their use. The key question remains: How well do respirators prevent airborne infectious diseases? The answer to this important question has important medical, public health, political and economic implications.
Description: Number of influenza A and B events in healthcare practitioners wearing N95 respirators compared to medical masks.
Measure: Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks (MM) as Assessed by Number of Influenza A and B Events Time: 60 weeksDescription: Number of influenza-like illnesses in healthcare practitioners wearing N95 respirators compared to medical masks.
Measure: Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Influenza-like Illnesses Time: 60 weeksDescription: Number of lab confirmed respiratory illnesses in healthcare practitioners wearing N95 respirators compared to medical masks.
Measure: Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Lab Confirmed Respiratory Illnesses Time: 60 weeksDescription: Number of lab detected respiratory infections in healthcare practitioners wearing N95 respirators compared to medical masks.
Measure: Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Lab Detected Respiratory Infections Time: 60 weeksDescription: Number of acute respiratory illnesses in healthcare practitioners wearing N95 respirators compared to medical masks.
Measure: Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Acute Respiratory Illnesses Time: 60 weeksDescription: Number of laboratory confirmed influenza illnesses in healthcare practitioners wearing N95 respirators compared to medical masks.
Measure: Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Laboratory Confirmed Illness Time: 60 weeksThe study will be conducted using nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected prospectively from individuals suspected of having the signs and symptoms of an acute respiratory tract infection caused by a respiratory virus. A series of standard viral culture tests validated for routine use in the clinical laboratory, and/or a series of PCR-based Laboratory Developed Tests (PCR-LDT) validated by a central reference laboratory will be used to verify the performance of the investigational artus Influenza A/B RT-PCR test and the QIAGEN ResPlex II Advanced Panel test. From each specimen five (5) aliquots will be prepared: (a) one aliquot will be tested in real-time using the assigned viral culture reference methods; (b) one aliquot will be used to extract nucleic acid in real-time for investigational testing; (c) one aliquot of the specimen will be stored at --70C for subsequent shipment to the reference laboratory for PCR-LDT testing, (d) one aliquot will be archived at -70C for subsequent follow-up by the reference laboratory (e.g., bi-directional sequencing of positive specimens), and (e) any remaining specimen will be stored for the Fresh vs. Frozen Study. The extracted nucleic acid generated from the second aliquot (i.e., "b" above) will be split and subjected to testing by both the artus Influenza A/B RT-PCR test and the ResPlex II Advanced Panel test.
Description: The presence of Influenza A or Influenza B virus.
Measure: Detection of Respiratory Viruses Time: Specimens will be taken within 5 days of the appearance of symptoms.This study will seek to enroll immunocompromised patients with Lower Tract parainfluenza infection. It also contains a sub-study to enroll patients with severe COVID-19.
Description: Removal of all oxygen support (with stable SpO2)
Measure: Percent of subjects who Return to Room Air (RTRA) (main study) Time: by Day 28Alphabetical listing of all HPO terms. Navigate: Correlations Clinical Trials
Data processed on September 26, 2020.
An HTML report was created for each of the unique drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms associated with COVID-19 clinical trials. Each report contains a list of either the drug, the MeSH terms, or the HPO terms. All of the terms in a category are displayed on the left-hand side of the report to enable easy navigation, and the reports contain a list of correlated drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms. Further, all reports contain the details of the clinical trials in which the term is referenced. Every clinical trial report shows the mapped HPO and MeSH terms, which are also hyperlinked. Related HPO terms, with their associated genes, protein mutations, and SNPs are also referenced in the report.
Drug Reports MeSH Reports HPO Reports