There are 12 clinical trials
Recent reports have identified a specific oncogenic mutation L265P of the MYD88 gene in approximately 90% of the patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. MYD88 is a key linker protein in the signaling pathway of Toll Like Receptors (TLRs) 7, 8, and 9, and IMO-8400 is an oligonucleotide specifically designed to inhibit TLRs 7,8, and 9. The scientific hypothesis for use of IMO-8400 to treat patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia depends on the inhibition of mutant MYD88 signaling in the TLR pathway, thereby interrupting the proliferation of cell populations responsible for the propagation of the disease.
Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Study in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia Recent reports have identified a specific oncogenic mutation L265P of the MYD88 gene in approximately 90% of the patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. --- L265P ---
Description: Safety and tolerability of IMO-8400 in patients with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia: Assessment of adverse events
Measure: Safety and Tolerability of IMO-8400 in Patients With Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia Time: Up to 24 weeksDescription: Best Overall Response using criteria from the VIth International Workshop in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia
Measure: Best Overall Response Time: Up to 24 weeksDescription: To identify an appropriate dose of IMO-8400 for further clinical evaluation via evaluation of DLT at each dose level
Measure: Identify the Number of Patients Experiencing DLTs at Each Dose Level Time: 28 daysDescription: Pharmacokinetics of escalating dose levels of IMO 8400 administered by SC injection - Cmax.
Measure: Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Dose Levels of IMO 8400 Administered by SC Injection - Cmax. Time: Cycle 1 Week 1 Day 1: Samples were obtained pre-dose (within 1 hr prior to injection) and post-dose at 1 hr (+/-5 min), 2 hrs (+/-10 min) and 4 hrs (+/-15 min)Description: Pharmacokinetics of escalating dose levels of IMO 8400 administered by SC injection - AUC0-t (hr*ng/mL) .
Measure: Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Dose Levels of IMO 8400 Administered by SC Injection - AUC0-t (hr*ng/mL) Time: Cycle 1 Week 1 Day 1: Samples were obtained pre-dose (within 1 hr prior to injection) and post-dose at 1 hr (+/-5 min), 2 hrs (+/-10 min) and 4 hrs (+/-15 min)Recent reports have identified a specific oncogenic mutation L265P of the MYD88 gene in approximately 30% of the patients with the activated B-cell (ABC) type of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). MYD88 is an initial adapter linker protein in the signaling pathway of the Toll Like Receptors (TLRs), including the endosomal TLRs 7, 8, and 9, for which the ligands are nucleic acids. IMO-8400 is an oligonucleotide specifically designed to inhibit ligand activation of TLRs 7,8, and 9. Recent studies indicate that in the presence of L265P mutation ligand activation of those TLRs results in markedly increased signaling with subsequent increased cell activation, cell survival, and cell proliferation. The scientific rationale for assessing the use of IMO-8400 to treat patients with DLBCL and the L265P mutation is based on laboratory observations that IMO-8400 inhibits ligand-based activation of cells with the mutation and decreases the survival and proliferation of the cell populations responsible for the propagation of the disease.
Phase I/II Open-label, Multiple-dose, Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of IMO-8400 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Presence of the MyD88 L265P Mutation. --- L265P ---
Dose Escalation Study in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL and MyD88 L265P Mutation Recent reports have identified a specific oncogenic mutation L265P of the MYD88 gene in approximately 30% of the patients with the activated B-cell (ABC) type of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). --- L265P ---
Dose Escalation Study in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL and MyD88 L265P Mutation Recent reports have identified a specific oncogenic mutation L265P of the MYD88 gene in approximately 30% of the patients with the activated B-cell (ABC) type of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). --- L265P --- --- L265P ---
IMO-8400 is an oligonucleotide specifically designed to inhibit ligand activation of TLRs 7,8, and 9. Recent studies indicate that in the presence of L265P mutation ligand activation of those TLRs results in markedly increased signaling with subsequent increased cell activation, cell survival, and cell proliferation. --- L265P ---
The scientific rationale for assessing the use of IMO-8400 to treat patients with DLBCL and the L265P mutation is based on laboratory observations that IMO-8400 inhibits ligand-based activation of cells with the mutation and decreases the survival and proliferation of the cell populations responsible for the propagation of the disease. --- L265P ---
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must have a diagnosis of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) of non-GCB subtype, established according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria that has been tested for the MyD88 L265P mutation. --- L265P ---
Being treated with other anti-cancer therapies (approved or investigational) 7. Has an active infection requiring systemic antibiotics 8. Has had surgery requiring general anesthesia within 4 weeks of starting the study 9. Has heart failure of Class III or IV Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must have a diagnosis of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) of non-GCB subtype, established according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria that has been tested for the MyD88 L265P mutation. --- L265P ---
Description: Frequency of adverse events, injection site reactions, and concomitant medications observed
Measure: Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Injection Site Reactions, and Concomitant Medications Time: Up to 2 years from first patient visitThis research study is evaluating a drug called ixazomib (also known as MLN9708) in combination with dexamethasone and rituximab (the regimen is called IDR) as a possible treatment for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM).
Progressive disease is defined as occurring when a >25% increase in serum IgM and an absolute 500mg/dL increase in IgM level occurs from the lowest attained response value, or progression of clinically significant disease related symptoms.. Overall Response Rate by MYD88 L265P and CXCR4-WHIM Status. --- L265P ---
To evaluate the overall response rate of participants by MYD88 L265P and CXCR4-WHIM mutations in WM. --- L265P ---
Description: Rate of very good partial response or better in patients treated with IDR. VGPR is defined as a >90% reduction in serum IgM levels from baseline.
Measure: Very Good Partial Response Rate (VGPR) for IDR Time: 76 weeksDescription: Overall response includes the rate of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), stabl disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Minor response is >25%-50% reduction in serum IgM from baseline. Partial Response is (>50-90% reduction in serum IgM from baseline. Very Good Partial Response is >90% reduction in serum IgM from baseline. Complete Response is resolution of all symptoms, normalization of serum IgM with disappearance of IgM paraprotein, resolution of any adenopathy or splenomegaly.
Measure: Overall Response Rate Time: 2 YearsDescription: Duration of time from start of treatment to disease progression. Progressive disease is defined as occurring when a >25% increase in serum IgM and an absolute 500mg/dL increase in IgM level occurs from the lowest attained response value, or progression of clinically significant disease related symptoms.
Measure: Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time: From start of treatment to time of disease progression, assessed up to 4 years after treatment startDescription: To evaluate the overall response rate of participants by MYD88 L265P and CXCR4-WHIM mutations in WM. Overall response is defined as achieving at least a minor response, or >25% reduction in serum IgM from baseline.
Measure: Overall Response Rate by MYD88 L265P and CXCR4-WHIM Status Time: 2 YearsDescription: Duration of time from start of treatment to time of disease progression.
Measure: Time to Progression (TTP) Time: From start of treatment to time of disease progression, assessed up to 4 years after treatment startDescription: The duration of response is measured from the time a participant achieved a response until the date of progression.
Measure: Duration of Response (DOR) Time: From the time each participant achieved a response to time of disease progression, assessed up to 4 years after treatment startDescription: Duration from start of protocol treatment to time of initiation of new therapy.
Measure: Time to Next Therapy (TTNT) Time: From start of treatment until the participant begins a new therapy, assessed up to 4 years after treatment startIn this prospective multicentric study, the University of Pavia together with the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia and the IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy will provide a systematic analysis of gene mutations in hematological malignancies by using NGS techniques. Patients with a conclusive diagnosis of haematological malignancies according to WHO criteria referred to the Rete Ematologica Lombarda clinical network (REL, www.rel-lombardia.net) will be enrolled. The investigators will analyse genomic DNA extracted from hematopoietic cells at different time points of patient disease. The study contemplates the use of molecular platforms (Next Generation Sequencing, NGS) aimed at the identification of recurrent mutations in myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms, respectively. Screening of gene mutations by NGS will be prospectively implemented in the context of REL clinical network. Patient samples will be analyzed at diagnosis and sequentially during the course of the disease at specific timepoints. The researchers will analyze the correlations between somatic mutations, specific clinical phenotypes (according to the WHO classification) and disease evolution. This will allow to: 1) identify new recurrent genetic mutations involved in the molecular pathogenesis of hematological malignancies; 2) define the role of mutated genes, distinguishing between genes which induce a clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells, and genes which determine the clinical phenotype of the disease; 3) identify mutations which are responsible for disease evolution; 4) define the diagnostic/prognostic role of the identified mutations, and update the current disease classifications and prognostic scores by including molecular parameters. A systematic biobanking of biological material will be provided.
Moreover in last years, researchers from the University of Pavia gave a significant contribution in the definition of the molecular basis of lymphoid neoplasms (i.e., BRAF V600E mutation in Hairy cell Leukemia, MYD88 L265P mutation in Waldenstrom disease, and SF3B1 mutations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia). --- V600E --- --- L265P ---
The investigators expect to enroll 15 participants with relapsed or refractory IgM-associated AL amyloidosis onto this Phase II clinical trial. Idelalisib will be self-administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice daily (may be increased to 150 mg (one tablet) twice daily after 3 months at investigator discretion). Participants will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or decision to withdraw from the trial. Disease evaluations will be performed every three months until disease progression.
IgM paraprotein identified on serum immunofixation electrophoresis OR light chain-restricted CD20+ lymphoplasmacytic population on biopsy of bone marrow or lymph node (identified by H&E/immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry) OR positive myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88-L265P) OR CXCR4WHIM mutation (CXCR4 mutation - warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, myelokathexis) on submitted samples 3.1.2 --- L265P ---
Description: Evaluate hematologic response according to standard criteria
Measure: Overall Response Time: 3 monthsDescription: Evaluate time to progression
Measure: Progression Free Survival Time: 1 yearDescription: Number of patients with organ response using standard AL amyloidosis criteria.
Measure: Organ Response Time: 3 monthsDescription: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v4.0
Measure: Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Agent Time: 3 monthsDescription: Evaluate quality of life according to Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-Lym) assessment tool
Measure: Quality of Life Time: 3 monthsWaldenström's macroglobulinemia is a rare disease whose pathophysiology remains at present poorly understood, although a recurrent mutation (L265P MYD88) has recently been described. Unlike other lymphoproliferative disorders, there is a defect in isotype switching, mechanism involving AID and NHEJ complex. Using a two-dimensional electrophoresis technology, our group showed that MW had a specific proteomic profile, and one of the differentially expressed proteins is Ku70 (encoded by XRCC6 belonging to NHEJ complex) . The investigators purpose to explore the mechanisms of underexpression of Ku70/XRCC6 (genetic or epigenetic modification) in comparison with other lymphoid malignancies and normal B cells.
Expression of Ku70/XRCC6 and Others NHEJ Components in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia in Comparison With Others B-cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders and Normal B Cells.. Expression of Ku70/XRCC6 in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia Waldenström's macroglobulinemia is a rare disease whose pathophysiology remains at present poorly understood, although a recurrent mutation (L265P MYD88) has recently been described. --- L265P ---
Inclusion Criteria: - Patient over 18 years, affiliated to the social regimen - Written consent collected MW group : - Patient with a diagnosis of MW according to WHO criteria (based on the results of serum protein electrophoresis, bone marrow analysis with immunophenotyping, cytogenetic analysis and mutation L265P MyD88) Other SLP : - Patient with diagnosis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma Healthy volunteers : - volunteers without blood disorders Exclusion Criteria: - Women of childbearing age who do not have an effective means of contraception - Pregnant or nursing - Demonstration of a kappa or lambda monotype on B lymphocytes - healthy volunteer with B-cell malignancy Inclusion Criteria: - Patient over 18 years, affiliated to the social regimen - Written consent collected MW group : - Patient with a diagnosis of MW according to WHO criteria (based on the results of serum protein electrophoresis, bone marrow analysis with immunophenotyping, cytogenetic analysis and mutation L265P MyD88) Other SLP : - Patient with diagnosis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma Healthy volunteers : - volunteers without blood disorders Exclusion Criteria: - Women of childbearing age who do not have an effective means of contraception - Pregnant or nursing - Demonstration of a kappa or lambda monotype on B lymphocytes - healthy volunteer with B-cell malignancy Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia null --- L265P ---
Inclusion Criteria: - Patient over 18 years, affiliated to the social regimen - Written consent collected MW group : - Patient with a diagnosis of MW according to WHO criteria (based on the results of serum protein electrophoresis, bone marrow analysis with immunophenotyping, cytogenetic analysis and mutation L265P MyD88) Other SLP : - Patient with diagnosis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma Healthy volunteers : - volunteers without blood disorders Exclusion Criteria: - Women of childbearing age who do not have an effective means of contraception - Pregnant or nursing - Demonstration of a kappa or lambda monotype on B lymphocytes - healthy volunteer with B-cell malignancy Inclusion Criteria: - Patient over 18 years, affiliated to the social regimen - Written consent collected MW group : - Patient with a diagnosis of MW according to WHO criteria (based on the results of serum protein electrophoresis, bone marrow analysis with immunophenotyping, cytogenetic analysis and mutation L265P MyD88) Other SLP : - Patient with diagnosis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma Healthy volunteers : - volunteers without blood disorders Exclusion Criteria: - Women of childbearing age who do not have an effective means of contraception - Pregnant or nursing - Demonstration of a kappa or lambda monotype on B lymphocytes - healthy volunteer with B-cell malignancy Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia null --- L265P --- --- L265P ---
Description: Comparing the average level of expression of Ku70 in B cells measured in patients of WM, in patients other SLP and in healthy subjects (without MW and other SLP) , matched for age ( +/- 5 years) and sex
Measure: Measure of ratio Ku70/XRCC6 Time: BaselineAnti-MAG (Myelin Associated Glycoprotein) neuropathy is related to clonal B lymphocyte proliferation producing an monoclonal immunoglobulin (IgM) with anti-MAG activity. IgM may be a reflection of malignant lymphoproliferative syndrome (Waldenström disease) or, more often, monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance. The anti-MAG antibody has a direct toxicity on the myelin sheath of the peripheral nervous system responsible for a length-dependent demyelinating polyneuropathy. Clinically, this results in a sensitive, ataxic predominant polyneuropathy in the lower limbs, sometimes associated with a tremor of attitude and action tremor of the upper limbs. Clonal B cells at the origin of IgM production may have acquired mutations affecting MYD88 (MYD88 L265P mutation) and CXCR4 (Whim-like CXCR4 mutation). The prevalence of the MYD88 L265P mutation is estimated to be 50% in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance and more than 80% in Waldenström disease. CXCR4 Whim-like mutations are found in 40% of patients with Waldenström's disease. No studies have reported the prevalence of these mutations in patients with anti-MAG neuropathies.
Clonal B cells at the origin of IgM production may have acquired mutations affecting MYD88 (MYD88 L265P mutation) and CXCR4 (Whim-like CXCR4 mutation). --- L265P ---
The prevalence of the MYD88 L265P mutation is estimated to be 50% in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance and more than 80% in Waldenström disease. --- L265P ---
Prevalence of MYD88 L265P mutations in anti-MAG neuropathies. --- L265P ---
Mutational status of MYD88 L265P is assessed using high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR). --- L265P ---
Description: Mutational status of MYD88 L265P is assessed using high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR)
Measure: Prevalence of MYD88 L265P mutations in anti-MAG neuropathies Time: At inclusion : after the patient's given consentDescription: Mutational status of CXCR4 is assessed using HTS and AS-PCR
Measure: Prevalence of CXCR4 Whim-like mutations in anti-MAG neuropathies Time: At inclusion : after the patient's given consentDescription: Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements are determined with a multiplex PCR
Measure: Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement Time: At inclusion : after the patient's given consentThis is a multi-center, open-label trial to evaluate oral administration of CA-4948 in adult patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. Part A will evaluate escalating doses of CA-4948 either as monotherapy (Part A1) or in combination with ibrutinib for non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Part A2). Once the combination dose has been determined, Part B will comprise an expansion phase to assess efficacy (CR rate) and safety of the RP2D of CA-4948 and ibrutinib in 4 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) disease-specific cohorts: - Cohort 1 - Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) - Cohort 2 - activated B-cell (ABC) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or extranodal subtypes: Leg-, testicular-, or not otherwise specified (NOS)-type - Cohort 3 - Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) - Cohort 4 - Patients receiving ibrutinib monotherapy who have developed adaptive, secondary resistance. Indications include: - Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), MZL, CLL/SLL, or WM/LPL - Indications for which ibrutinib is National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-listed (e.g., PCNSL) - Patients with NHL and known myddosome mutations - Patients may be candidates for maintaining ibrutinib while CA-4948 will be added for resistance reversal. A brief gap of ibrutinib therapy of <3 weeks is acceptable.
The population will be enriched for MYD88 L265P mutations. --- L265P ---
Description: The number of patients with a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first treatment cycle
Measure: To determine the safety and tolerability of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib: dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) Time: 12 monthsDescription: MTD determined by the highest dose level studied at which fewer than 2 out of 6 subjects (<33%) experience a dose limiting toxicity
Measure: Part A: Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib measured by dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) Time: 12 monthsDescription: RP2D selected based on overall tolerability data from all patients treated at different dose levels and will not exceed the MTD.
Measure: Part A: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib based on overall tolerability data Time: 12 monthsDescription: Assessed by CR
Measure: Part B: To assess complete response (CR) rate of CA-4948 in combination with ibrutinib. Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Assessed by ORR
Measure: Part B: To assess overall response rate (ORR) of CA-4948 in combination with ibrutinib. Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Area Under the concentration-time curve (AUC)
Measure: Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CA-4948 measured by AUC Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)
Measure: Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CA-4948 measured by Cmax Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Trough plasma concentration (Cmin)
Measure: Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CA-4948 measured by Cmin Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax)
Measure: Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CA-4948 measured by Tmax Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Plasma terminal elimination half-life (T 1/2)
Measure: Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CA-4948 measured by plasma terminal half-life Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Assessed by ORR
Measure: To assess efficacy of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib measured by overall response rate (ORR) Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Assessed by DOR
Measure: To assess efficacy of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib measured by duration of response (DOR) Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Assessed by DCR
Measure: To assess efficacy of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib measured by disease control rate (DCR) Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Assessed by PFS
Measure: To assess efficacy of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib measured by progression free survival (PFS) Time: 24- 36 monthsDescription: Assessed by OS
Measure: To assess efficacy of CA-4948 as a monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib measured by overall survival (OS) Time: 24 - 36 monthsDescription: CNS liquor with be sampled from an Ommaya reservoir or with a spinal puncture about 3 hours after oral dosing of CA-4948. At approximately the same timepoint, a peripheral blood sample will be taken to obtain a plasma sample. The respective CA-4948 concentrations will be measured in the liquor and in plasma samples. The liquor vs plasma concentration ratio will provide a rough estimate of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration of CA-4948 following oral dosing.
Measure: Part B: To estimate the blood-brain barrier penetration in CNS lymphoma patients Time: 1 dayMulticenter retrospective and prospective observational study including patients with WM or IgM-MGUS evaluated at the time of diagnosis and during the disease course using highly sensitive techniques.
To demonstrate that the rate of mutations of MYD88 (L265P) and/or CXCR4 (S338X) detected in peripheral blood and/or urine show a negligible difference with the rate of mutations detected in bone marrow samples (BM, gold standard). --- L265P ---
Description: To demonstrate that the rate of mutations of MYD88 (L265P) and/or CXCR4 (S338X) detected in peripheral blood and/or urine show a negligible difference with the rate of mutations detected in bone marrow samples (BM, gold standard)
Measure: Rate of mutation Time: 22 monthsWaldenström's disease (WM) is a rare, low-grade lymphoid hematopathy, accounting for 1 to 2% of malignant hematopathies and mainly affecting the elderly. This disease is characterized by lymphoplasmocyte cells infiltration into the bone marrow and by the production of a monoclonal IgM protein in the serum. This disease is accompanied by clinical manifestations of hepato-splenomegaly, signs of hyperviscosity, peripheral neuropathies and biological signs with the presence of cytopenias and cryoglobulinemia. Some forms present node or splenic involvement. While the asymptomatic form maintains overall survival close to that of the healthy subject, the symptomatic form is subject to frequent relapses and remains incurable. Current recommendations for the diagnosis and monitoring of this disease are based on protein electrophoresis from a blood sample to quantify monoclonal IgM production and a myelogram or bone marrow biopsy showing medullary infiltration by lymphoplasmocytic cells. However, protein electrophoresis is an imprecise examination since it does not quantify tumour B lymphocytes and has limitations, particularly in the case of poorly secreting forms. More than 90% of Waldenström cases have the L265P mutation of the MYD88 gene. Although this mutation is not found only in these diseases, it can help in the diagnosis. Other mutations are also present in this pathology. These mutations can define prognostic factors or possibly make it possible to identify therapeutic targets. The development of new technologies makes it possible, on the one hand, to follow the L265P mutation of MYD88 over time as a marker of response to treatment and, on the other hand, to define these prognostic markers or therapeutic targets. This study will first determine the best method for monitoring the mutation of MYD88. In a second step, the investigators will evaluate the best type of sampling and in particular whether this mutation is present in the blood in order to limit the invasive procedures such as bone marrow sampling can be limited. Finally, the investigators will evaluate the prognostic
More than 90% of Waldenström cases have the L265P mutation of the MYD88 gene. --- L265P ---
The development of new technologies makes it possible, on the one hand, to follow the L265P mutation of MYD88 over time as a marker of response to treatment and, on the other hand, to define these prognostic markers or therapeutic targets. --- L265P ---
Finally, the investigators will evaluate the prognostic Quantification of MYD88 L265P mutation. --- L265P ---
Comparison of level of MYD88L265P mutationin different biological compartment c.. Allelic frequency of L265P mutation of MYD 88 gene. --- L265P ---
Inclusion Criteria: - Over 18 years of age - recently diagnosed for Waldenström's disease - not yet treated for Waldenström's disease Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy or breast feeding - HBV or HBC positive - HIV positive Inclusion Criteria: - Over 18 years of age - recently diagnosed for Waldenström's disease - not yet treated for Waldenström's disease Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy or breast feeding - HBV or HBC positive - HIV positive Waldenstrom's Disease Osteochondritis The L265P mutation of MYD88 appears as an early oncogenic event in the occurrence of Waldenström disease and may already be present at the Monoclonal Gammapathy of Undetermined Signification (MGUS) to IgM stage suggesting a continuum between the two stages of the disease. --- L265P ---
Monitoring the L265P mutation of MYD88 as a marker of minimal residual disease therefore appears to be a biomarker of major interest in these diseases. --- L265P ---
Several published studies show the interest of monitoring the L265P mutation of MYD88 in MW in particular by quantification of the mutation by allele-specific PCR. --- L265P ---
The originality of this study is based on the comparison of the quantification of the MYD88 L265P mutation in all affected biological compartments (blood, plasma, bone marrow or CD19+ cells) but especially in the monitoring of the mutation at two points of minimal residual disease (mid-treatment and end of treatment). --- L265P ---
One of the parts of the project is the study of the allelic frequency of the L265P mutation of the MYD88 gene in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). --- L265P ---
In this study, the allele frequency of the L265P mutation of MYD88 will be compared . --- L265P ---
Description: Comparison of level of MYD88L265P mutationin different biological compartment c.
Measure: Quantification of MYD88 L265P mutation Time: one yearDescription: Comparison of allelic frequency determined by three different techniques (next generation sequencing, digital PCR and specific allele PCR)
Measure: Allelic frequency of L265P mutation of MYD 88 gene Time: one yearDescription: determination of the kinetics of mutation
Measure: Kinetics of mutation Time: one yearIt is a phase II, multicenter, open-label study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a novel BTK inhibitor, ICP-022, in approximately 85 subjects with R/R DLBCL. There will be no control group in this study. Each subject will receive treatment orally every day in 28-day cycles. Each cycle starts immediately after the previously completed cycle without a break between cycles.
Key Inclusion criteria: 1. Men and women between 18 and 75 years old, 2. Histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL)with MyD88 L265P and CD79B positive, at least one measurable tumor of greater than 1.5 centimeter in long axis by contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, 3. ECOG performance status of 0-2, 4. Voluntary written informed consent prior to trail screening. --- L265P ---
Description: The efficacy measured by overall response rate (ORR) according to the 2014 International Working Group NHL
Measure: Overall response rate(ORR) Time: Up to 3 yearsDescription: The safety of ICP-022 measured by the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events according to NCI-CTCAE 5.0 grading criteria
Measure: Occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events Time: Up to 3 yearsDescription: The efficacy measured by progression free survival(PFS)
Measure: Progression free survival(PFS) Time: Up to 3 yearsWithin this exploratory multicohort phase II trial, SAKK aims to evaluate a PET_CT and ctDNA oriented therapy in DLBCL in order to test the following working hypothesis. - acalabrutinib-R-CHOP may improve the progression free survival in genetically defined DLBCL harboring the MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations; - treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL patients who have positive PET/CT (with residual disease scored as Deauville score 4) and no molecular response (<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two courses of R-CHOP could improve the anti-tumour activity of R-CHOP; - treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus 2 rituximab single agent infusions does not compromise the outcome in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two R-CHOP, and further improve to Deauville score 1-2 and absence of ctDNA after two more R-CHOP courses.
- acalabrutinib-R-CHOP may improve the progression free survival in genetically defined DLBCL harboring the MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations; - treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL patients who have positive PET/CT (with residual disease scored as Deauville score 4) and no molecular response (<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two courses of R-CHOP could improve the anti-tumour activity of R-CHOP; - treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus 2 rituximab single agent infusions does not compromise the outcome in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two R-CHOP, and further improve to Deauville score 1-2 and absence of ctDNA after two more R-CHOP courses. --- L265P ---
- acalabrutinib-R-CHOP may improve the progression free survival in genetically defined DLBCL harboring the MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations; - treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL patients who have positive PET/CT (with residual disease scored as Deauville score 4) and no molecular response (<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two courses of R-CHOP could improve the anti-tumour activity of R-CHOP; - treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus 2 rituximab single agent infusions does not compromise the outcome in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two R-CHOP, and further improve to Deauville score 1-2 and absence of ctDNA after two more R-CHOP courses. --- L265P --- --- L265P ---
Primary objectives: - Assessing the efficacy of acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL harboring MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations (cohort A) - Assessing the activity of treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP followed by acalabrutinib monotherapy in DLBCL patients who are double positive: PET/CT positive (Deauville score 4) and no molecular response (<2log10 fold reduction) after two courses of R-CHOP (cohort B) - Exploring the feasibility of treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus two infusions of single agent rituximab in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two cycles of R-CHOP, which further improve to Deauville score 1-2 and absence of ctDNA after two additional R-CHOP courses (cohort C). - Exploring clinical implications of having a negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) but no molecular response (<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) vs a positive PET/CT (Deauville score 4) but molecular response (>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two R-CHOP courses (cohort D) Secondary objectives: - Safety and tolerability of acalabrutinib-R-CHOP - Assessment of prognostic value of baseline PET radiomics indexes, alone or in association with other parameters --- L265P ---
Primary objectives: - Assessing the efficacy of acalabrutinib-R-CHOP in DLBCL harboring MYD88 L265P and/or CD79A/B mutations (cohort A) - Assessing the activity of treatment escalation to acalabrutinib-R-CHOP followed by acalabrutinib monotherapy in DLBCL patients who are double positive: PET/CT positive (Deauville score 4) and no molecular response (<2log10 fold reduction) after two courses of R-CHOP (cohort B) - Exploring the feasibility of treatment de-escalation to 4 total R-CHOP courses plus two infusions of single agent rituximab in patients lacking both MYD88 L265P and CD79A/B mutations and quickly obtaining both negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) and molecular response (>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two cycles of R-CHOP, which further improve to Deauville score 1-2 and absence of ctDNA after two additional R-CHOP courses (cohort C). - Exploring clinical implications of having a negative PET/CT (Deauville score 1-3) but no molecular response (<2log10 reduction of ctDNA) vs a positive PET/CT (Deauville score 4) but molecular response (>2log10 reduction of ctDNA) after two R-CHOP courses (cohort D) Secondary objectives: - Safety and tolerability of acalabrutinib-R-CHOP - Assessment of prognostic value of baseline PET radiomics indexes, alone or in association with other parameters --- L265P --- --- L265P ---
Description: PFS is defined as the time from registration until the first event of interest: Progressive disease according to the Lugano Classification Death from any cause Patients not having an event at the time of analysis and patients starting a new anticancer therapy in the absence of an event will be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment showing non-progression before starting a new treatment.
Measure: Cohorts A, C and D: Progression free survival (PFS) according to the Lugano criteria Time: from registration until the first event as defined in PFS (estimated 2 years)Description: Patients with CR at the end of therapy will be considered CR. Patients with no tumor assessment at the end of therapy will be considered: non-CR, if they have no following tumor assessment within the trial (patient died, refused, started a new treatment or was lost to follow-up) or if they have non-CR at the following tumor assessment after the end of therapy. CR, if they have CR at the following tumor assessment after end of therapy before starting a new treatment.
Measure: Cohort B: Complete remission (CR) rate at the end of therapy according to the Lugano criteria Time: estimated 9 months after registrationDescription: All AEs will be assessed according to NCI CTCAE v5.0.
Measure: Adverse events (AEs) Time: record throughout treatment phase (until 28 days after last dose of trial treatment)Description: OS will be calculated from registration until death from any cause. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive.
Measure: Overall survival (OS) Time: from registration to date of death from any cause (estimated 5 years)Description: Analogous to the evaluation of the primary endpoint of cohorts A, C and D, but in cohort B.
Measure: Progression free survival in cohort B Time: from registration until the first event as defined in PFS (estimated 2 years)Description: Analogous to the evaluation of the primary endpoint of cohort B, but in cohorts A, C and D.
Measure: Complete remission rate in cohorts A, C and D Time: estimated 9 months after registrationDescription: ORR at the end of therapy is defined as either PR or CR (OR) according to the Lugano criteria. Patients with no tumor assessment at the end of therapy will be considered: non-OR, if they have no following tumor assessment within the trial (patient died, refused, started a new treatment or was lost to follow-up) or if they have non-OR at the following tumor assessment after the end of therapy. OR, if they have OR at the following tumor assessment after end of therapy before starting a new treatment
Measure: Overall response rate (ORR) Time: estimated 9 months after registrationDescription: The DoR will be calculated from when the criteria for CR or PR are met, until documentation of progressive disease thereafter. Only patients with a CR or PR will be included in this analysis. Patients without any documentation of progressive disease thereafter will be censored at the last date of tumor assessment without progression and before the start of a new anti-lymphoma treatment, if any.
Measure: Duration of response (DoR) Time: estimated 2 years