Developed by Shray Alag, The Harker School
Sections: Correlations,
Clinical Trials, and HPO
Navigate: Clinical Trials and HPO
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| drug394 | Attention Placebo Wiki | 1.00 |
| drug2350 | Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy Wiki | 0.71 |
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| D040921 | Stress Disorders, Traumatic NIH | 0.12 |
| D013313 | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic NIH | 0.12 |
| D012127 | Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn NIH | 0.06 |
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation |
|---|
Navigate: Correlations HPO
There are 2 clinical trials
This research study is designed to investigate the effects of a remotely delivered simple cognitive task (a memory cue followed by playing the computer game "Tetris" with mental rotation instructions) on intrusive memories ("flashbacks") and other symptoms after a traumatic event(s). Hospital staff who experienced a work-related traumatic event(s) during the COVID-19 pandemic will be randomly allocated to either the simple cognitive task intervention or control. Randomization to assigned intervention occurs on Day 1, after completion of baseline measures (note: baseline measures are not used in randomization process). Baseline measures include questionnaires on Day 1 and an intrusive memory diary during the previous week (Week -1). Participants will be followed up at one week and one month, and where possible 3 and 6 months. It is predicted that participants given the simple cognitive task intervention will develop fewer intrusive memories, less severe related clinical symptoms, and will show higher functioning (e.g. at work) than those who are not. This will inform the future development of a simple technique to prevent distressing psychological symptoms after a traumatic event(s). Implementation and training aspects regarding remote recruitment and intervention delivery in a hospital context will also be explored. Participants use e.g. their smartphone for part of the intervention in the study.
Description: Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event(s) recorded by participants in a brief diary daily (morning, afternoon, evening and night) for 7 days.
Measure: Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event(s) Time: Week 5Description: Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event(s) recorded by participants in a brief diary daily (morning, afternoon, evening and night) for 7 days.
Measure: Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event(s) Time: Week -1 and Week 1Description: A single item measuring the frequency of intrusive/unwanted memories of the traumatic event(s) in the previous week on a 7-point scale (from "never" to "many times a day", with a follow-up question to specify the number if necessary) that will be used as a convergent measure for medical hospital staff who may face time constraints completing the diary.
Measure: Intrusion questionnaire - frequency item Time: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1 and 5 and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: 5 self-rated items measuring the characteristics of intrusive/unwanted memories in the previous week. The level of distress, nowness, reliving, disconnectedness and whether different triggers are associated with the intrusive/unwanted memories of the traumatic event(s) are measured on a 101-point scale (from 0 to 100). Higher scores indicate more intrusive/unwanted memories, higher levels of distress/nowness/reliving/disconnectedness and a greater number of different triggers.
Measure: Intrusion questionnaire - characteristics Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: Self-report measure that assesses subjective distress after a traumatic event (with reference to study event[s]) in the last week. Here we include the intrusion subscale (8 items) and the avoidance subscale (8 items). Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Subscale scores are calculated for the Intrusion or Avoidance items summed (ranging from 0 to 32 each). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measure: Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R): Degree of subjective distress of post-trauma intrusion and avoidance symptoms Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: The PCL-5 short version is an 8-item self-report measure that assesses current symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in the last month [Baseline (Day 1), 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up] and in the last week (One week). Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). The PCL-5 short version yields a total symptom severity score which ranges from 0 to 32. Subscale symptom severity scores for DSM-5 symptom cluster B - intrusion symptoms (items 1-2), cluster C - avoidance (items 3-4), cluster D - negative alterations in cognitions and mood (items 5-6), and cluster E - alterations in arousal and reactivity (items 7-8). Higher scores indicate worse severity.
Measure: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5) short version Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: 2 self-rated items measuring the level of distress and vividness associated with the intrusions (11 point scales from 0 to 10) rated within the diary at baseline (Day 1), week 1 and week 5. High scores indicate higher level of distress/vividness.
Measure: Characteristics of intrusive trauma memories Time: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1 and week 5Description: Two items measuring the level of concentration disruption associated with the intrusions (11 point scale from 0 to 10) and the duration of disruption (< 1 min, 1-5 min, 5-10 min, 10-30 min, 30-60 min, > 60 min). High scores indicate higher level of concentration disruption and longer duration of disruption.
Measure: Self-rated concentration disruption associated with intrusive memories Time: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1 and Week 5, 1, 3, and 6 months follow-upDescription: 3 bespoke items including a question on impact on work-related functioning, and one on daily functioning in other areas associated with the intrusions and a question on perceived social support after the traumatic event. All items are rated on an 11-point scale (from 0 "none"; 5 "some"; 10 "extreme/much"). Higher scores indicate higher level of functional impairment/perceived social support.
Measure: Self-rated functioning and social support ratings Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow upDescription: 6 self-report items (11-point scale from 0 to 100) measuring appraisals of intrusions on two subscales: psychological problems (items 1-3) and negative self-evaluations (items 4-6). Items for each subscale will be summed. Possible subscale scores range from 0 - 300, with higher values indicative of worse appraisals.
Measure: Appraisals of intrusive memories Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: Two self rated items: Item 1 measures the extent of being troubled by poor sleep (with reference to study event) on a 5 point scale (from not at all to very much), and item 2 measures the number of nights in the week with sleep problems on a 5 point scale (from 0-1 to 5-7 nights). Each 5-point scale is reverse scored (4 - 0) then summed. Possible total scores range from 0 - 8, with higher values indicative of better sleep.
Measure: Self-rated sleep ratings Time: Baseline (Day 1), one week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: A single item measuring perceived health status on a seven-point scale (from very good to very bad). The scale is reverse scored. High scores indicate good outcomes.
Measure: Self Rated Health (SRH) rating Time: Baseline (Day 1), one week, and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: 3 free text response field questions (e.g. which type of health care do you work with right now?) at Day 1 and two free text response field questions on whether the work situation changed and if yes, how, at one week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up.
Measure: Questions related to work situation Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: 2 bespoke items measuring the total number and the number of full work days on sick leave because of reason for seeking health care. Higher numbers indicate more sick leave.
Measure: Sick leave Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: 3 items measuring the frequency of feeling stressed, pressured, tensed at work during the previous week on a 5-point scale (from "never" to "several times per day"). Item scores are summed. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. Further, a single item measuring difficulties to let go of work-related thoughts during leisure time (from "very rarely or never" to "very often or always") and a single question about whether the above mentioned difficulties are because of intrusive memories with a yes/no response.
Measure: Stress and Energy Questionnaire (SEQ) - Stress subscale Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: 9 self-report items (4-point scale from 1 "not at all" to 4 "all the time") measuring symptoms of burnout on three subscales: Exhaustion (items 1-3), disengagement (items 4-6) and inattentiveness (items 7-9). Subscale scores will be the mean of all items per subscale, the total burnout score will be the mean of all items (ranging from 1-4) with higher scores indicative of higher levels of exhaustion/disengagement/inattentiveness/burnout.
Measure: Scale of Work Engagement and Burnout (SWEBO) - Burnout subscale Time: Baseline (Day 1) and 6 month follow-upDescription: 5 self-report items measuring moral stress at work on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly agree") to 4 ("Strongly disagree"). All items are summed. Potential scores range from 5-20, with higher scores indicative of lower levels of moral stress.
Measure: Moral stress at work Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: A free text response field measuring the occurrence of any health problems since the last contact.
Measure: Adverse events Time: One week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: A free text response field asking to imagine a future self identity. Then a free text response field to describe a mental image of this identity, 2 items measuring vividness (from 1 "not vivid at all" to 10 "very vivid") and positivity (from 1 "very negative" to 10 "very positive") of that image on a 10-point scale and 1 item measuring the perspective of viewing that mental image ("through own eyes" or "as if seeing oneself") before and after the traumatic event(s). Higher scores on rating scales indicate higher levels of vividness/positivity.
Measure: Future self questionnaire - shortened version Time: 3 month follow-upDescription: 8 self-report items (5-point scale from 1 to 5) measuring time perspective on three subscales: past perspective (items 3, 5, 7), present perspective (items 1, 8) and future perspective (items 2, 4, 6). Item scores for each subscale will be summed. Higher values indicate higher levels of past/present/future time perspective.
Measure: Time perspective questionnaire Time: Baseline (Day 1), One week, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-upDescription: 2 free text response field questions (e.g. Are there any specific factors you think have made it easier for you to handle the COVID-19 situation and its consequences?) at Day 1.
Measure: Coping mechanisms Time: Baseline (Day 1)Description: 5 item questionnaire (11-point scale from 0 to 10) that rates to what degree the participant finds the intervention credible. High scores indicate greater credibility.
Measure: Credibility/expectancy questionnaire Time: Day 1Description: A bespoke manipulation check item measuring self-rated distress during the intervention/control procedure (11-point scale from 0 to 10) at 3 times during the intervention process. Higher scores indicate higher level of distress.
Measure: Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) Time: Day 1Description: 8 bespoke items including questions about study participation e.g. how acceptable was it to do the task? Rated on 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), higher scores indicate higher acceptability; and questions about what has happened since the study with a yes/no response e.g. have you had any psychological or medical treatment since you did the task; and items with a free text response field e.g. do you have any other comments.
Measure: Feedback questionnaire about participation Time: 1 month follow-upThis feasibility study aims to adapt a protocol usually run in the laboratory in the Psychology Department for healthy participants (including the trauma film paradigm (James et al., 2016) and a simple cognitive task intervention) to remote (online) delivery. The motivation for this was restrictions to running in person laboratory experiments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants will view film footage with COVID-19 related and potentially traumatic content (e.g. of seriously ill or dying patients in hospitals). Following film viewing, participants will be randomly allocated to either the experimental condition (simple cognitive task intervention, i.e. a memory cue followed by playing the computer game "Tetris" with mental rotation instructions) or the control condition (attention placebo, i.e., a memory cue followed by listening to a podcast for a similar duration). Any intrusive memories induced by the film (analogue trauma) will be monitored in a daily diary. It is predicted that the film (analogue trauma) will generate intrusive memories. If intrusive memories are generated, then it is predicted that participants in the experimental condition will report fewer intrusive memories related to the film (analogue trauma) during the following week than participants in the control condition. The development of this paradigm may inform the future development of a simple technique to prevent intrusive memories e.g. after repeated media consumption related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Description: Number of intrusive memories related to the trauma film recorded by participants in a brief diary daily for 7 days.
Measure: Number of intrusive memories related to the trauma film Time: Week 1Description: 2 self-rated items measuring the level of distress and vividness associated with the intrusions related to the trauma film (11-point scales from 0 to 10) rated within the diary. High scores indicate higher level of distress/vividness.
Measure: Characteristics of intrusive trauma memories related to the trauma film Time: Week 1Description: 1 self-rated item measuring the frequency of intrusive/unwanted memories of the trauma film in the previous week on a 7-point scale (from "never" to "many times a day", with a follow-up question to specify the number if necessary). Unless the answer to item 1 is "never", 5 self-rated items measuring the characteristics of intrusive/unwanted memories in the previous week. The level of distress, nowness, reliving, disconnectedness and whether different triggers are associated with the intrusive/unwanted memories of the trauma film are measured on a 101-point scale (from 0 to 100). Higher scores indicate more intrusive/unwanted memories, higher levels of distress/nowness/reliving/disconnectedness and a greater number of different triggers.
Measure: Intrusion questionnaire Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: Self-report measure that assesses subjective distress after a traumatic event (with reference to the trauma film). Here we include the intrusion subscale (8 items). Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Items are summed (subscale score ranges from 0 to 32). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measure: Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R): Degree of subjective distress of post-film intrusions Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: A single bespoke item on impact on daily functioning associated with the intrusions from the trauma film rated on a 11-point scale (from 0 "none"; 5 "some"; 10 "extreme"). Higher scores indicate higher level of functional impairment.
Measure: Self-rated functioning associated with intrusive memories Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: A single bespoke item measuring the level of concentration disruption associated with the intrusions from the trauma film (11 point scale from 0 to 10). High scores indicate higher level of concentration disruption.
Measure: Self-rated concentration disruption associated with intrusive memories Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: Two self rated items: Item 1 measures the extent of being troubled by poor sleep (with reference to study event) on a 5-point scale (from not at all to very much), and item 2 measures the number of nights in the week with sleep problems on a 5-point scale (from 0-1 to 5-7 nights). Each 5-point scale is reverse scored (4 - 0) then summed. Possible total scores range from 0 - 8, with higher values indicative of better sleep.
Measure: Self-rated sleep ratings Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: In the Intrusion Provocation Task (IPT), participants are presented with neutral still images from the trauma film. Immediately afterwards for the next two minutes, they are allowed to think freely and report intrusions by pressing a button. The IPT intrusion score is calculated by the total frequency of intrusions (i.e. number of button presses), whilst higher values represent more intrusions.
Measure: Intrusion provocation task (IPT) Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: The verbal recognition memory test comprises a number of true/false written statements relating to the trauma film. Participants indicate true or false as to whether or not the written statement about the film they watched 7 days earlier is correct. The score is the sum of correct responses, a higher score indicating better verbal recognition memory of the trauma film.
Measure: Verbal recognition memory test Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: The visual recognition memory test consists of static visual images - some are taken from throughout the film (different images from those used in the IPT), and some are unviewed images presented as filler. Images are presented individually and participants are instructed to view each image for 5 s. Participants indicate yes or no as to whether or not they recognize the image as being from the trauma film they watched 7 days earlier. The score is the sum of correct responses, a higher score indicating better visual recognition memory of the trauma film.
Measure: Visual recognition memory test Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: 8 self-report items (5-point scale from 1 to 5) measuring time perspective on three subscales: past perspective (items 3, 5, 7), present perspective (items 1, 8) and future perspective (items 2, 4, 6). Item scores for each subscale will be summed. Higher values indicate higher levels of past/present/future time perspective.
Measure: Time perspective questionnaire Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: Three free text response fields asking to imagine a future self identity in relation to social/occupational/other important situations. A single item measuring which of these future identities has been most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Then a free text response field to describe a mental image of this identity, 4 items measuring vividness (1 "not vivid at all", 10 "very vivid"), positivity (1 "very negative", 10 "very positive"), regularity of rehearsal (1 "never", 10 "very regularly"), and likelihood (1 "not at all likely", 10 "very likely") of that image on a 10-point scale. 3 items measuring the perspective of viewing that mental image ("through own eyes" or "as if seeing oneself"), whether other people are in the image (if yes, how many), and how old one will be in the image. All items are answered in terms of how the image was before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Free text response field asking how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the future identity image.
Measure: Future self questionnaire Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: Self-report measure that assesses expectancies about positive future life events. 10 items are rated regarding how likely it is that the event will happen in one's future on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 ("not at all likely") to 7 ("extremely likely"). Items are summed. Higher scores indicate more optimistic/positive future expectancies.
Measure: Future Expectancy Scale Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: 1 self-rated item measuring the frequency of intrusive/unwanted memories of traumatic events related to COVID-19 or media consumption on COVID-19 in the previous week on a 7-point scale (from "never" to "many times a day", with a follow-up question to specify the number if necessary).
Measure: Number of unwanted/intrusive memories of COVID-19 media footage during the week before study participation Time: Day 1Description: 6 visual analogue scale ratings measuring how sad, hopeless, depressed, fearful, horrified and anxious participants feel "right at this very moment" on a scale from 1 "not at all" to 10 "extremely" assessed before and after film viewing and after completing the experimental or control condition task as well as in the beginning of session 2 (Week 1 follow-up). Rating are summed yielding a composite negative mood score, with higher scores indicating higher negative mood.
Measure: Negative mood ratings Time: Day 1 and Week 1 follow-upDescription: 4 rating scales measuring how distressing participants found the trauma film, how much attention they paid to the film, how personally relevant the film was for them and how much they looked away from the film on a 11-point scale from 0 "not at all" to 10 "extremely".
Measure: Post-trauma-film ratings Time: Day 1Description: 6 free text response fields in which participants are asked to list the images/moments of the trauma film that were worst for them with a brief description. This list is part of the memory cue procedure in the experimental/control condition.
Measure: Hotspots related to the trauma film (memory cue) Time: Day 1Description: 4 rating scales measuring how entertaining/difficult/distracting participants found the task they were doing in the experimental/control condition and how much attention they paid to the task they were doing in the experimental/control condition on a 11-point scale from 0 "not at all" to 10 "extremely".
Measure: Post-condition ratings Time: Day 1Description: 2 items measuring to which extent participants believe that playing Tetris/listening to a podcast after watching a distressing film increases or decreases intrusive memories of the film on a 21-point scale from -10 (extreme decrease), 0 (no effect), to 10 (extreme increase).
Measure: Demand ratings about conditions Time: Week 1 follow-upDescription: 4 items measuring to which extent participants agree to statements about being aware of the purpose of the study on a 7-point scale from 1 "Do not agree at all" to 7 "Completely agree". Two items are reverse scored and then all items are summed. Higher scores indicate higher demand effects.
Measure: Perceived Awareness of the Research Hypothesis Scale Time: Week 1 follow-upAlphabetical listing of all HPO terms. Navigate: Correlations Clinical Trials
Data processed on September 26, 2020.
An HTML report was created for each of the unique drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms associated with COVID-19 clinical trials. Each report contains a list of either the drug, the MeSH terms, or the HPO terms. All of the terms in a category are displayed on the left-hand side of the report to enable easy navigation, and the reports contain a list of correlated drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms. Further, all reports contain the details of the clinical trials in which the term is referenced. Every clinical trial report shows the mapped HPO and MeSH terms, which are also hyperlinked. Related HPO terms, with their associated genes, protein mutations, and SNPs are also referenced in the report.
Drug Reports MeSH Reports HPO Reports