Developed by Shray Alag, The Harker School
Sections: Correlations,
Clinical Trials, and HPO
Navigate: Clinical Trials and HPO
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug3895 | TY027 Wiki | 0.58 |
drug3181 | Quality-of-Life Assessment Wiki | 0.52 |
drug12 | 0.9% Saline Wiki | 0.41 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
D008545 | Melanoma NIH | 0.33 |
D009369 | Neoplasms, NIH | 0.10 |
D018352 | Coronavirus Infections NIH | 0.02 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
HP:0012056 | Cutaneous melanoma HPO | 0.33 |
HP:0002664 | Neoplasm HPO | 0.10 |
Navigate: Correlations HPO
There are 3 clinical trials
This study uses questionnaires to gain an understanding of how experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, regardless of COVID-19 status, may have impacted health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and other areas such as COVID-19-specific psychological distress, disruptions to health care, finances and social interactions in cancer patients. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease that is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The information learned from this study will guide the development of psychosocial programs to improve patient care and outcomes in cancer patients and survivors in the context of facing a global pandemic.
Description: Assessed using a COVID-19 questionnaire. Responses are provided on a Likert scale (from 1 to 4) where participants are asked to rank statements from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree.''
Measure: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID19)-specific psychological distress Time: At baselineDescription: Will be tested using path analysis. Path analyses also provides an opportunity to test direct and indirect or mediation effects. Significance and goodness of fit of the model will be interpreted using several indices. A Comparative Fit Index (CFI) value of 0.90 or greater and a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.08 or less will be used to establish model fit. The Lagrange multiplier and the Wald tests will be used to guide model modifications.
Measure: The extent to which COVID-19 experiences are associated with COVID-19 specific psychological distress, health, financial and social disruptions, perceived benefits and social support, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) Time: At baselineDescription: Assessed using a COVID-19 questionnaire. Responses are provided on a Likert scale (from 1 to 4) where participants are asked to rank statements from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The measure provides a total score summary that indicates the degree to which the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the participant. Items that tap into resiliency are reverse scored. Will use multigroup analyses by levels of the moderator to identify differences in the magnitude of the associations based on the level of the moderator.
Measure: Resiliency factors Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using appropriate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) techniques adjusting for important confounders differentiating those who did and did not complete the current survey.
Measure: Group differences in the outcomes assessed in the protocol relative to prior group assignment in the behavioral clinical trials Time: At baselineDescription: Assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-7 (FACTG7). The FACTG7 is a well-validated and commonly used measure of HRQoL in oncology. A total score provides an index of HRQoL, with higher scores reflecting better HRQOL
Measure: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form survey (SF-36). The FACTG7 is a well-validated and commonly used measure of HRQoL in oncology. A total score provides an index of HRQoL, with higher scores reflecting better HRQOL
Measure: General quality of life (QOL) Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI is an 18-item self-rated questionnaire that assesses quality of sleep and sleep disturbances over a 1-month period. The PSQI has good internal and test-retest reliability.
Measure: Sleep disturbances Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using the Centers for Epidemiological Studies-Depression measures (CES-D). The CES-D is a well-validated 20-item self-report measure of depression that focuses on affective components of depression. Internal consistency is high and it also has demonstrated adequate convergent validity with other measures of depression. Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
Measure: Depression Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using the Speilberger State/Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The STATE scale (Form Y-1) is a 20-item scale that provides information about a person's current level of anxiety. The TRAIT scale (Form Y-2) is a 20-item scale that provides information about a person's general anxiety. STAI scores are commonly classified as "no or low anxiety" (20-37), "moderate anxiety" (38-44), and "high anxiety" (45-80)
Measure: Changes in anxiety Time: At baselineDescription: Will be measured using the 24-item Social Provisions Scale that includes subscales for attachment, social integration, opportunity for nurturance, reassurance of worth, reliable alliance, and guidance.
Measure: Perceived availability of social support Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire. This assessment provides statements relating to the five components observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience and asks participants to mark the extent to which each statement is true in their life, using a five-point scale.
Measure: Elements of mindfulness Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using the Mindful Eating Questionnaire validated by Framson et al. at each time point. Scoring of this evaluation provides an overall "summary" score, as well individual scores in the five categories of awareness, distraction, dis-inhibition, emotions, and external factors while eating.
Measure: Non-judgmental physical and emotional sensations associated with eating Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using the Self-Compassion Scale. This assessment is a 12-item questionnaire that provides questions about self-judgments, self-kindness, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness and over-identification using a five-point scale.
Measure: The degree to which participants exercise compassion towards themselves under difficult circumstances and how this impacts their emotions Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed with the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. This questionnaire has been used extensively in research with cancer survivors. It is easy to administer. the activity score of 24 units and more as active (substantial benefits); the activity score of 14-23 units as moderately active (some benefits); and the activity score of 13 units and less as inactive (less substantial or low benefits) at first.
Measure: Physical activity Time: At baselineDescription: Will be measured using the Impact of Event Scale (IES) that assesses the two most common categories of responses to stressful events: intrusion (intrusively experienced ideas, images, feelings, or bad dreams) and avoidance (consciously recognized avoidance of certain ideas, feelings, or situations).
Measure: Intrusive thoughts, or the tendency to ruminate on or avoid thoughts about stressors Time: At baselineDescription: Will monitor patients' diets using The National Institutes of Health - Fruit and Vegetable Screener.
Measure: Basic fruit/vegetable intake Time: At baselineDescription: Will be assessed using The National Institutes of Health - Fat Screener.
Measure: Usual intake of percentage energy from fat Time: At baselineDescription: As engagement in mind-body practices has been found to decrease stress, engagement in the core Mind-body practices that the patients learned in the past will be assessed with an instrument that lists the different techniques and mind body practices and ask study participants how often they have practiced each technique. The scale goes from "not at all to more than once a day". The instrument also asks participants about the benefits obtained from practicing each technique, the scale goes from "does not apply/I did not practice to yes, definitively beneficial."
Measure: Engagement in the core mind-body practices that the patients learned Time: At baselineThe primary purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of how experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, regardless of COVID-19 status, may have impacted multiple domains of health-related quality of life and other areas such as COVID-19 specific psychological distress, and disruptions to health care, finances and social interactions. We will also evaluate the extent to which resiliency factors such as social support, perceived benefits under times of stress, and ability to manage stress may buffer associations between COVID-19 experiences and HRQoL. To meet these objectives, we have developed a 10-minute questionnaire that taps into these areas and is based on prior work addressing concerns of other pandemics or national crises. Participants will have previously consented to protocol PA15-0336 and have provided prior lifestyle data. This will allow us to connect the COVID-19 survey data with prior existing data.
Description: Including exposure, risk factors, testing, isolation, seropositivity, hospitalization, or loss of family or friends.
Measure: Experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic Time: Survey completion Up to 2 monthsDescription: Will evaluate the extent to which resiliency factors such as social support and perceived benefits moderate the effects of COVID-19 experiences on COVID-19-specific psychological distress and HRQoL.
Measure: Effects of COVID-19 experiences on COVID-19-specific psychological distress and HRQoL Time: Survey completion Up to 2 monthsDescription: Will explore the association between prior lifestyle data collected as part of PA15-0336 and COVID-19-specific psychological distress and HRQoL.
Measure: Prior lifestyle data Time: Survey completion Up to 2 monthsThe study investigates how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the psychological, financial, physical, and social well-being of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients and survivors. AYA cancer survivors have inferior long-term survival compared to the general population, and the negative impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic may be even higher in this vulnerable group. The information gained from this study may provide an opportunity to determine the self-reported COVID-19 specific psychological distress in AYA cancer survivors, and may lead to the development of a targeted intervention to improve physical and psychosocial health for AYA cancer patients and survivors.
Description: Assessed per responses to the 12 questions pertaining to COVID-19 specific psychological stress within the adolescent and young adults (AYA) Cancer Survivor COVID-19 Survey section titled, "COVID-19 Related Distress (Emotional and Physical Reactions) and Health Behaviors.'' This survey includes both a 5-level Likert scale for the respondent's current level of concern (Not at all, A little, Neutral, A lot, Very Much), plus an ordinal 3-level scale for the respondent to rate the perceived level of change compared to before COVID-19 (Less, Same, More). Responses to individual questions will be summarized at each time point as means (for the Likert scale) and percentages (for discrete levels of change), together with 95% confidence intervals. For each question, will also summarize the percentages of patients in each group checking one of the 3 levels (Less, Same, More) indicating whether they perceived a change in that question since before COVID-19.
Measure: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) specific psychological stress Time: At baseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsDescription: Will be summarized by group and time point. Associations between endpoints and demographic, treatment-related and resilience variables, as well as differences among groups will be assessed by t-test, analysis of variance or Chi-square test. Non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sum, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact) will be employed when appropriate. Regression models (e.g., linear, logistic etc.) will also be employed. Change from baseline to subsequent time points in Likert scores will be modeled by mixed-effect models, while blocking on patient to control for repeated measures. Models will include baseline demographic, treatment-related, and resilience factor variables as covariates.
Measure: Survey responses Time: At baseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsDescription: Will be summarized by group and time point. Associations between endpoints and demographic, treatment-related and resilience variables, as well as differences among groups will be assessed by t-test, analysis of variance or Chi-square test. Non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sum, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact) will be employed when appropriate. Regression models (e.g., linear, logistic etc.) will also be employed. Change from baseline to subsequent time points in Likert scores will be modeled by mixed-effect models, while blocking on patient to control for repeated measures. Models will include baseline demographic, treatment-related, and resilience factor variables as covariates.
Measure: Patient reported outcomes Time: At baseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsDescription: Will be summarized by group and time point. Associations between endpoints and demographic, treatment-related and resilience variables, as well as differences among groups will be assessed by t-test, analysis of variance or Chi-square test. Non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sum, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact) will be employed when appropriate. Regression models (e.g., linear, logistic etc.) will also be employed. Change from baseline to subsequent time points in Likert scores will be modeled by mixed-effect models, while blocking on patient to control for repeated measures. Models will include baseline demographic, treatment-related, and resilience factor variables as covariates.
Measure: Changes of survey responses Time: At baseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsDescription: Will be summarized by group and time point. Associations between endpoints and demographic, treatment-related and resilience variables, as well as differences among groups will be assessed by t-test, analysis of variance or Chi-square test. Non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sum, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact) will be employed when appropriate. Regression models (e.g., linear, logistic etc.) will also be employed. Change from baseline to subsequent time points in Likert scores will be modeled by mixed-effect models, while blocking on patient to control for repeated measures. Models will include baseline demographic, treatment-related, and resilience factor variables as covariates.
Measure: Changes in discrete responses Time: At baseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsDescription: Will be separately modeled by logistic regression with relation to group and time point as well as demographic and cancer characteristics in order to assess factors associated with non-response and to assess associated bias. Other statistical approaches might be used as appropriate.
Measure: Incidence of survey question non-response Time: At baseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsAlphabetical listing of all HPO terms. Navigate: Correlations Clinical Trials
Data processed on September 26, 2020.
An HTML report was created for each of the unique drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms associated with COVID-19 clinical trials. Each report contains a list of either the drug, the MeSH terms, or the HPO terms. All of the terms in a category are displayed on the left-hand side of the report to enable easy navigation, and the reports contain a list of correlated drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms. Further, all reports contain the details of the clinical trials in which the term is referenced. Every clinical trial report shows the mapped HPO and MeSH terms, which are also hyperlinked. Related HPO terms, with their associated genes, protein mutations, and SNPs are also referenced in the report.
Drug Reports MeSH Reports HPO Reports