Developed by Shray Alag, The Harker School
Sections: Correlations,
Clinical Trials, and HPO
Navigate: Clinical Trials and HPO
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| drug3963 | Tests Wiki | 0.50 |
| drug4007 | Throat swab and/or nasopharyngeal swab Wiki | 0.50 |
| drug4159 | Urine sample Wiki | 0.50 |
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| drug3517 | Saliva sample Wiki | 0.50 |
| drug1382 | End tidal breath sample Wiki | 0.50 |
| drug3803 | Sulodexide Wiki | 0.50 |
| drug3691 | Sputum sample Wiki | 0.50 |
| drug2512 | Nasopharyngeal swab Wiki | 0.35 |
| drug1776 | Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) Wiki | 0.22 |
| drug605 | Blood sample Wiki | 0.15 |
| drug2916 | Placebo Wiki | 0.02 |
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders NIH | 0.11 |
| D007251 | Influenza, Human NIH | 0.11 |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases NIH | 0.10 |
| Name (Synonyms) | Correlation |
|---|
Navigate: Correlations HPO
There are 4 clinical trials
The aim of this study is to generate epidemiological data to further explore determinants of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and the contribution of bacterial and viral pathogens to Acute Exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) episodes.
Description: An Acute Exacerbation in a COPD patient is an event in the natural course of the disease characterized by a change in the patient's baseline dyspnea, cough, and/or sputum production and beyond normal day to day variations, that is acute in onset and may warrant a change in regular medication in a patient with underlying COPD The Means and Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated using the Negative Binomial model taking into account time to follow up. Estimated exacerbations were presented as mean number of exacerbations per (/) subject/ year.
Measure: Mean Estimated Number of Acute Exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) Time: During year 1Description: Bacterial pathogens assessed were: Haemophilus influenzae (Hi), Moraxella catarrhalis (Mcat), Steptococcus pneumoniae (Sp), Staphylococcus Aureus (Sta), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psa), any or other. For each bacteria, the means and CIs were estimated from Negative Binomial model taking into account the follow up time.Estimated exacerbations were presented as mean number of exacerbations/ subject/ year.
Measure: Mean Estimated Number of AECOPD With Sputum Containing Bacterial Pathogens Time: During Year 1Description: Bacterial pathogens assessed, by culture, were: Haemophilus influenzae (Hi), Moraxella catarrhalis (Mcat), Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp), Staphylococcus aureus (Sta), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psa), any bacteria or other bacteria. Overall exacerbation rate is the average number of exacerbations for each subject during their time in the study.
Measure: Overall AECOPD Exacerbation Rate for Any and Specific Bacterial Pathogens in Sputum Time: During Year 1Description: Sputum samples were tested by bacterial species (any bacteria, Hi, Mcat, Sp, Sta, Psa and other bacteria), or overall and were obtained from culture at each visit (enrollment, any stable visit, any exacerbation visit, any mild exacerbation visit, any moderate exacerbation visit, any severe exacerbation visit). This endpoint presents results for any bacteria and Hi.
Measure: Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Specific Pathogens - Any Bacteria and Hi Time: During Year 1Description: Sputum samples were tested by bacterial species (any bacteria, Hi, Mcat, Sp, Sta, Psa and other bacteria), or overall and were obtained from culture at each visit (enrollment, any stable visit, any exacerbation visit, any mild exacerbation visit, any moderate exacerbation visit, any severe exacerbation visit). This endpoint presents results for Mcat and Sp.
Measure: Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Specific Pathogens - Mcat and Sp Time: During Year 1Description: Sputum samples were tested by bacterial species (any bacteria, Hi, Mcat, Sp, Sta, Psa and other bacteria), or overall and were obtained from culture at each visit (enrollment, any stable visit, any exacerbation visit, any mild exacerbation visit, any moderate exacerbation visit, any severe exacerbation visit). This endpoint presents results for Sta, Psa and other bacteria.
Measure: Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Specific Pathogens - Sta, Psa and Other Bacteria Time: During Year 1Description: The number of days between 2 consecutive exacerbations, as estimated by the investigator, was calculated only whenever the first exacerbation had an end date.
Measure: Mean Number of Days Between 2 Consecutive AECOPDs Time: During Year 1Description: The exacerbations of chronic pulmonary disease tool version 1.0 (EXACT) is a validated self-administered instrument that evaluates the effects of pharmacologic treatment on acute exacerbations of COPD. Analyses of exacerbations in relation to morning or evening EXACT-PRO e-diaries were presented as follows: descriptive statistics on the EXACT daily scores tabulated at enrolment, at any stable and at any, mild, moderate or severe exacerbation visit. EXACT-PRO contains 14 questions with scores ranging from 0 to 4, where 0= best outcome while 4= worse outcome.
Measure: Change From Baseline EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Scores at Enrollment and Any AECOPD Visit Time: During Year 1Description: The COPD assessment test (CAT) is a validated self-administered instrument designed to provide a simple and reliable measure of health status in COPD patients. Its properties have been shown to be similar to the St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). The CAT comprises 8 items and has a scoring range of 0-40, 0= most positive answer and 40= most negative answer. In this study, the subjects were to complete the CAT questionnaire every 3 months.
Measure: Change From Baseline COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Enrollment and Any AECOPD Visit Time: During Year 1Description: The NEADL assessed (quarterly in the present study) the ease or difficulty in performing extended activities of daily living. The NEADL scale contains 22 items, each measured on a 4-point Likert scale. There are four dimensions: mobility (6 items); kitchen (5 items); domestic (5 items); leisure (6 items). These are summed producing a total score reflecting general functioning. Each of the 22 individual items had 2 possible scores (0 or 1). Therefore, the range of the NEADL score was 0 to 22. Lower scores indicate greater levels of disability while higher scores indicate greater independence.
Measure: Change From Baseline COPD Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (NEADL) Scores at Enrollment and Any AECOPD Visit Time: During Year 1Description: The EQ-5D is an established measure of generic health outcome that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value that can be used in clinical and economic evaluation of healthcare and in population surveys. Its current format is 3-level and 5 dimensional (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). The EQ-5D index was derived from the ratings recorded every 3 months for each of the five individual items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). The EQ-5D index was 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state). The negative numbers presented represent a decrease from baseline values and a worsening of health.
Measure: Change From Baseline COPD EQ-5D Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Enrollment and Any AECOPD Visit Time: During Year 1Description: AECOPD health care type included: general practitioners (other than the study doctor), pneumologists, other specialists, hospital emergency department, home care nurses, pulmonary rehabilitation programs and/or nutrition advices.
Measure: Number of Subjects Receiving Various Health Care Types During AECOPD Time: During Year 1Description: Serious adverse events (SAEs) include medical occur-rences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitali-zation or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disabil-ity/incapacity.
Measure: Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Possibly Related/Linked to Withdrawal Time: During Year 1Description: Bacterial pathogens assessed, by PCR assay were: Hi, Mcat, Sp, Sta, Psa, Streptococcus pyogenes (Spyo) and any bacteria.
Measure: AECOPD Rate With Overall and Specific Bacterial Pathogens in Sputum , by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay Time: During Year 1Description: Viral pathogens assessed were: respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza virus (PIV), entero rhinovirus (ENV), human metapneumovirus (HMP), influenza virus (INV), adenovirus (ADV), coronavirus (CRV), human bocavirus (HBoV) and any virus.
Measure: AECOPD Rate With Overall and Specific Viral Pathogens in Sputum Time: During Year 1Description: Viral pathogens assessed were: respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza virus (PIV), entero rhinovirus (ENV), human metapneumovirus (HMP), influenza virus (INV), adenovirus (ADV), coronavirus (CRV), human bocavirus (HBoV) and any virus. Mild exacerbations were defined as worsening symptoms of COPD that were self-managed by the patient.
Measure: Mild-AECOPD Rate With Overall and Specific Viral Pathogens in Sputum Time: During Year 1Description: Viral pathogens assessed were: respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza virus (PIV), entero rhinovirus (ENV), human metapneumovirus (HMP), influenza virus (INV), adenovirus (ADV), coronavirus (CRV), human bocavirus (HBoV) and any virus. Moderate exacerbations were defined as worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics.
Measure: Moderate-AECOPD Rate With Overall and Specific Viral Pathogens in Sputum Time: During Year 1Description: Viral pathogens assessed were: respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza virus (PIV), entero rhinovirus (ENV), human metapneumovirus (HMP), influenza virus (INV), adenovirus (ADV), coronavirus (CRV), human bocavirus (HBoV) and any virus. Severe exacerbations were defined as worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with in-patient hospitalisation or home care intervention.
Measure: Severe-AECOPD Rate With Overall and Specific Viral Pathogens in Sputum Time: During Year 1Description: An Acute Exacerbation in a COPD patient is an event in the natural course of the disease characterized by a change in the patient's baseline dyspnea, cough, and/or sputum production and beyond normal day to day variations, that is acute in onset and may warrant a change in regular medication in a patient with underlying COPD. AECOPD severity was assessed as: any, mild, moderate and severe. Any = any COPD symptom regardless of severity. Mild = Worsening symptoms of COPD that are self-managed by the patient. Moderate = Worsening symptoms of COPD that require treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe = Worsening symptoms of COPD that require treatment with in-patient hospitalisation or home care intervention.
Measure: AECOPD Rate With Overall and Specific Bacterial Pathogens in Sputum by Severity Time: During Year 1This study aims to quantify the inpatient and ER visits burden of laboratory-confirmed influenza, and compare the clinical features, severity, complications, risk factors and socioeconomic impact of influenza in children presenting with acute respiratory illness (ARI) and/or isolated fever, with or without laboratory-confirmed influenza.
Description: ARI was defined as one or more of the following symptoms: sore throat (in children greater than or equal to (≥) 3 years old), coryza (runny nose), cough, breathing difficulties. Isolated fever was defined as: oral temperature ≥37.5°C / axillary temperature ≥37.5°C / Rectal temperature ≥38°C / tympanic temperature on oral setting ≥37.5°C / tympanic temperature on rectal setting ≥38°C without an obvious cause.
Measure: Number of Subjects With Laboratory-confirmed Influenza Presenting With an Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI) and/or Isolated Fever Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: Ward specific room charge and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were computed as daily charge multiplied by the number of days.
Measure: Direct Medical Cost Per Hospitalization or ER Visit With Laboratory-confirmed Influenza Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: Among the other laboratory-confirmed respiratory viruses there were:adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus 1, 2 and 3, metapneumovirus, bocavirus, rhinovirus or coronavirus. The outcome was assessed in subjects with an acute respiratory illness (ARI) and/or isolated fever episode.
Measure: Number of Subjects With Other Laboratory-confirmed Respiratory Viruses Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: Deaths from ARI and/or fever episodes by laboratory-confirmed influenza status were assessed.
Measure: Number of Subjects With Fatal Outcomes Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: The outcome assessed the various complications by laboratory-confirmed influenza status.
Measure: Number of Subjects With Secondary Bacterial Infections Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: Risk factors were classified as pre-existing conditions, breast-feeding status and day-care status.
Measure: Number of Subjects With Potential Risk Factors at Study Start by Laboratory-confirmed Influenza Status Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: The outcomes was assessed in subjects with laboratory-confirmed influenza status
Measure: Number of Days of Hospitalization Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37 (between October 2010 until May 2011)Description: ARI and/or fever related medication included: antivirals, antibiotics, cough suppressants, pain medication, antipyretics and mucolytics.
Measure: Number of Subjects Using Any ARI and/or Fever Related Medication Taken Prior to Hospitalization or ER Visit by Laboratory-confirmed Influenza Status Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: ARI and/or fever related medication included: antivirals, antibiotics, cough suppressants, pain medication, antipyretics and mucolytics.
Measure: Number of Subjects Using Any ARI and/or Fever Related Medication Prescribed During Hospitalization or ER Visit by Laboratory-confirmed Influenza Status Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: ARI and/or fever related medication included: antivirals, antibiotics, cough suppressants, pain medication, antipyretics and mucolytics.
Measure: Number of Subjects Using Any ARI and/or Fever Related Medication Prescribed Since Hospitalization or ER Visit by Laboratory-confirmed Influenza Status Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: ARI and/or fever related medication included: antivirals, antibiotics, cough suppressants, pain medication, antipyretics and mucolytics.
Measure: Number of Subjects Using Any Non-prescribed ARI and/or Fever Related Medication Taken Since Hospitalization or ER Visit Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: School absenteeism was assessed among patients during the follow-up period by laboratory-confirmed influenza status.
Measure: Number of Days of School Absenteeism Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: This outcome assessed absenteeism among caregivers to provide patient care during the follow-up period by laboratory-confirmed influenza status.
Measure: Number of Days of Parent or Caregiver Time Off Work Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: This outcome assessed the number of cases with household contacts presenting influenza like illness symptoms during the follow-up period by laboratory-confirmed influenza status.
Measure: Number of Subjects With Household Members With Influenza-like Illness Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37Description: This outcome assessed the proportion of influenza like illness (ILI) among household members of children < 15 years with and without laboratory-confirmed influenza.
Measure: Proportion of Household Members Presenting Influenza Like Illness Symptoms (ARI and/or Isolated Fever) Time: Day 0 till Day 28-37This is observational study to assess the prognosis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR and exposed to trimethylxanthine (TMX). Trimethylxanthine is the active molecule present in coffee. Due to the lack of etiologic treatments and considering interest about old treatments as an avenue for research, we conducted a comparative study aiming to evaluate the effect of 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine on COVID-19 infected patients. This is actually a study about methodology. The objective of this study is therefore not to demonstrate the effect of the substance on the disease but the importance of a rigorous methodology in scientific research. This project is called "Method and Teaching of Scientific Studies".
Description: the patient clinical status at day 6 after hospital admission, defined as alive, or dead.
Measure: Comparison of vital status Time: 6 daysDescription: Evaluated by National Early Warning Score from 0 to 20, 20 being the worst score, with a high risk of death.
Measure: Comparaison of severity Time: 6 daysDescription: with
Measure: Comparaison of secondary effects (adverse events that needed disruption of treatment (anemia, tachycardia, osteoporosis) : secondary effects of coffee). Time: 6 daysThe investigators hypothesize that detection of SARS-CoV2 on saliva samples will increase the performance of the screening program compared to the reference strategy (RT-PCR on a nasopharyngeal swab).
Description: RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal is considered as gold standard
Measure: Positivity of RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab for the SARS-CoV-2 virus Time: At diagnosisDescription: Number of samples tested in a day for each test
Measure: Practicability to samples Time: At diagnosisDescription: Quantity of premises required for each test
Measure: Practicability to premises Time: At diagnosisDescription: Feasibly Reading and interpretation For each test
Measure: Practicability to interpretation Time: At diagnosisDescription: Render times for each test
Measure: Practicability to render time Time: At diagnosisDescription: Research of IgG by ELISA and RDT
Measure: IgG Antibody detection in saliva Time: At diagnosisDescription: Research of IgM by ELISA and RDT
Measure: IgM Antibody detection in saliva Time: At diagnosisDescription: Research of IgA by ELISA and RDT
Measure: IgA Antibody detection in saliva Time: At diagnosisDescription: Evaluation by questionnaire of the patient tolerance of the salivary self-sampling compared to the nasopharyngeal swab (questions are about pain, discomfort, speed of performance)
Measure: Patient tolerance of the salivary self-sampling Time: At diagnosisDescription: Evaluation by questionnaire of the operator tolerance of the salivary self-sampling compared to the nasopharyngeal swab (questions is about pain, discomfort, speed of performance)
Measure: Operator tolerance of the salivary self-sampling Time: At diagnosisDescription: Including sampling, transport, technique (consumables, reagents, machine), human resources
Measure: Cost of each approach Time: At diagnosisAlphabetical listing of all HPO terms. Navigate: Correlations Clinical Trials
Data processed on September 26, 2020.
An HTML report was created for each of the unique drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms associated with COVID-19 clinical trials. Each report contains a list of either the drug, the MeSH terms, or the HPO terms. All of the terms in a category are displayed on the left-hand side of the report to enable easy navigation, and the reports contain a list of correlated drugs, MeSH, and HPO terms. Further, all reports contain the details of the clinical trials in which the term is referenced. Every clinical trial report shows the mapped HPO and MeSH terms, which are also hyperlinked. Related HPO terms, with their associated genes, protein mutations, and SNPs are also referenced in the report.
Drug Reports MeSH Reports HPO Reports