CovidResearchTrials by Shray Alag


CovidResearchTrials Covid 19 Research using Clinical Trials (Home Page)


Internet-connected computer tabletWiki

Developed by Shray Alag
Clinical Trial MeSH HPO Drug Gene SNP Protein Mutation


Correlated Drug Terms (1)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
drug763 Convalescent plasma Wiki 0.23

Correlated MeSH Terms (3)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
D003289 Convalescence NIH 0.45
D045169 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome NIH 0.05
D018352 Coronavirus Infections NIH 0.04

Correlated HPO Terms (0)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation

There is one clinical trial.

Clinical Trials


1 Pilot Study - Randomized Controlled Trial of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits

The inability to access and use smartphones or camera-outfitted internet-connected devices during the COVID-19 pandemic relegates certain patients to receive audio-only telemedicine instead of audio/video-based telemedicine. The investigators are conducting a randomized controlled trial in order to characterize patient and provider attitudes towards these two modalities of care and to test the feasibility of a new model to make tablets for video-based care accessible to those who need that. The investigators hypothesize that patient and provider satisfaction will be higher with video-based telehealth when compared to phone-based telehealth.

NCT04496713 Telemedicine Other: Internet-connected computer tablet

Primary Outcomes

Description: Provider rating will be assessed with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating of 0-10; 0 being worst provider possible and 10 being best provider possible.

Measure: Provider rating as assessed by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. Satisfaction (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). In general, I was satisfied with using a video or phone call for this visit I could explain my medical problems well enough Talking to the doctor was as satisfying as talking in person Overall score 3 to 15 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction.

Measure: Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient as assessed by a Likert scale

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Description: Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree]. In general, I was satisfied with using telemedicine for this visit Talking to the patient was as satisfying as talking in person. Overall score 2 to 10 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction.

Measure: Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Description: Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to efficacy. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree]. b. I was able to understand the patient's explanation of their medical problems well enough. c. In general, this telemedicine visit was effective in improving this patient's medical care d. An in-person visit would likely have provided additional clinically-relevant information e. An in-person visit would likely have led to a change in management

Measure: Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Description: The ability of a provider to communicate will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to communication. Did this provider explain things in a way that was easy to understand? Yes/No

Measure: Provider communication as assessed by yes/no question

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Description: Provider listening will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to listening. Did this provider listen carefully to you? Yes/No

Measure: Provider listening as assessed by yes/no question

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Description: Provider respect will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to respect. Did this provider show respect for what you had to say? Yes/No

Measure: Provider respect as assessed by yes/no question

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Description: Provider time spent will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to time spent during the clinical encounter. Did this provider spend enough time with you? Yes/No

Measure: Provider time spent as assessed by yes/no question

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Description: Patient health will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to patient health. In general, how would you rate your overall health? Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor In general, how would you rate your overall mental or emotional health? Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Overall score 2 to 10 with lower scores signifying better health.

Measure: Patient health rating as assessed by a likert scale

Time: Within 2 weeks of the study visit


No related HPO nodes (Using clinical trials)