Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
drug2201 | Sarilumab SAR153191 Wiki | 0.71 |
drug1822 | Placebo Wiki | 0.04 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
D007239 | Infection NIH | 0.04 |
D045169 | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome NIH | 0.04 |
D018352 | Coronavirus Infections NIH | 0.03 |
Name (Synonyms) | Correlation |
---|
There are 2 clinical trials
In the general population, increased WBCC and neutrophil count are widely used as markers for infection during inflammatory states 1. However, 32% of geriatric patients with an infection do not develop an increase in WBCC 2. The hypothesis is that with inflammation, geriatric patients have a misadapted response of the immune system (IS) 3. Our recent retrospective study 4 has shown that total and differential WBCC were not correlated with infection in a geriatric hospitalized population. Therefore, WBCC does not seem to be a reliable marker for infection in geriatric hospitalized patients. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and CRP, seem to be better markers. the aim of the study to investigate this hypothesis prospectively and assess the role of aging and chronic diseases (such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and risk factors (CVRF) 5, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection 6, periodontitis 7, onychomycosis 8 ) in this process and assess the role of a geriatric assessment. To assess the usefulness of WBCC in the diagnosis of infection in geriatric patients and to address the contribution of ongoing chronic co-morbidities and age to WBCC-kinetics during an acute inflammatory syndrome, young and geriatric hospitalized patients with an inflammatory syndrome with and without infection will be compared
Description: observation of WBCC is correlated with infection by older patient
Measure: Usefulness of white blood cell count (WBCC) during infection in geriatric patient Time: 1.5 yearsThe disease COVID-19 has been classified as pandemic by World Health Organisation (WHO) in March 2020. This poses a risk to healthcare workers. Whether esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a aerosol-generating procedure (AGP) has brought controversy. Multiple international guidelines consider EGD as AGP based on expert consensus. No scientific data has been published regarding this. With a commercially available particle counter, we can differentiate the particle counts of different sizes in different areas of the endoscopy room. An increase from baseline particles of < 5um during or after the procedure would suggest that the procedure is an AGP. The baseline particle counts before and during the procedure are also recorded. The details of the procedure including procedure time and the use of sedation are also documented.