CovidResearchTrials by Shray Alag


CovidResearchTrials Covid 19 Research using Clinical Trials (Home Page)


Saliva collectionWiki

Developed by Shray Alag
Clinical Trial MeSH HPO Drug Gene SNP Protein Mutation


Correlated Drug Terms (19)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
drug1262 Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol Wiki 0.45
drug370 Blood collection Wiki 0.45
drug581 Clinical assessment Wiki 0.45
drug365 Blood Collection Wiki 0.45
drug585 Clinical interview Wiki 0.45
drug2607 Urine collection Wiki 0.45
drug2269 Sirukumab Wiki 0.45
drug2680 Waitlist Wiki 0.45
drug212 Artemesia annua Wiki 0.45
drug385 Blood samples collection Wiki 0.45
drug1732 PET/CT Scan Wiki 0.45
drug828 Effortful Control Camp Wiki 0.45
drug2291 Sputum collection Wiki 0.45
drug1117 Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Wiki 0.32
drug2321 Standard of Care (SOC) Wiki 0.26
drug512 Camostat Mesilate Wiki 0.20
drug852 Enoxaparin Wiki 0.15
drug1270 Ivermectin Wiki 0.11
drug1822 Placebo Wiki 0.03

Correlated MeSH Terms (11)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
D014397 Tuberculosis, Pulmonary NIH 0.45
D014376 Tuberculosis NIH 0.32
D020141 Hemostatic Disorders NIH 0.13
D001778 Blood Coagulation Disorders NIH 0.13
D001008 Anxiety Disorders NIH 0.08
D011024 Pneumonia, Viral NIH 0.06
D055371 Acute Lung Injury NIH 0.04
D012127 Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn NIH 0.04
D012128 Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult NIH 0.04
D018352 Coronavirus Infections NIH 0.04
D011014 Pneumonia NIH 0.03

Correlated HPO Terms (2)


Name (Synonyms) Correlation
HP:0001928 Abnormality of coagulation HPO 0.13
HP:0002090 Pneumonia HPO 0.03

There are 5 clinical trials

Clinical Trials


1 Using Biomarkers to Predict TB Treatment Duration

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a bacterial lung infection. Typical treatment using anti-TB drugs lasts about 6 months. Some people with less severe TB might not need to take the drugs that long. Researchers think a PET/CT lung scan along with estimating how much TB is in the lungs might show who will be cured after only 4 months of treatment. Objective: To demonstrate that 4 months of treatment is not inferior to 6 months of treatment for people with less severe TB. Eligibility: People 18-75 years old who have TB treatable with standard TB drugs Design: Participants will be screened with: Medical history Physical exam Blood and urine tests HIV test Sputum sample: Participants will be asked to cough sputum into a cup. Chest x-ray Participants will start TB drugs. They will have visits at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and about 6 more times during the 18-month study. Visits include: Sputum samples Physical exam Blood tests PET/CT scans at 2-3 visits: Participants fast for about 6 hours before the scan. Participants get FDG, a type of sugar that gives off a small amount of radiation, through an arm vein. They lie on a table in a machine that takes pictures of the body. Chest x-rays at 1-2 visits Participants who we believe are likely to be cured at 4 months will be randomly assigned to get either 6 months of treatment or 4 months of treatment. Participants may be asked to join a substudy using their sputum samples or additional blood tests.

NCT02821832 Pulmonary Tuberculosis Procedure: Saliva collection Procedure: Urine collection Procedure: Sputum collection Procedure: Blood Collection Radiation: PET/CT Scan Drug: Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol
MeSH:Tuberculosis Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Primary Outcomes

Description: Estimation of the lower bound of a one-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in success rates between arms B and C. If the lower bound is greater than -7%, this will be evidence that the treatment-shortening arm is not inferior to the standard duration arm.

Measure: Comparison of the rate of treatment success at 18 months (after treatment initiation) between Arms B and C.

Time: 18 months

Secondary Outcomes

Description: The difference (and 95% confidence interval) in treatment success rates between a combined A+B Arm (with Arm A participants selected to represent a true 6-month standard of care population) and a combined Arm A+C (with the remaining Arm A participants selected to represent a treatment shortening strategy arm, and no overlap in Arm A participants assigned to B and C).

Measure: Radiologic, Immunologic and microbiologic measures

Time: 18 months

2 Development of a Molecular Diagnostic Strategy for SARS-CoV2 Based on Saliva in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The objective of the study is to develop and validate a molecular diagnostic strategy (RT-ddPCR multiplex) of COVID-19 based on a saliva sample and alternative to the RT-qPCR method, in order to : 1. to compensate for the risk of a shortage of diagnostic kits, reagents and materials necessary for molecular diagnosis; 2. to increase the molecular diagnostic capacity of COVID-19 at the Rouen University Hospital; 3. and to have a method compatible with screening extended to populations at risk.

NCT04367545 COVID RT-ddPCR Multiplex Diagnostic Test: Saliva collection

Primary Outcomes

Measure: Number of positive patient using saliva method compared to number of positive patient using standard method

Time: One hour

Measure: Number of negative patient using saliva method compared to number of negative patient using standard method

Time: One hour

3 Human Ab Response & immunoMONItoring of COVID-19 Patients

Prospective, mono centric study on COVID-19 patients with or without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to analyse the dynamics of the immune response and to search for biomarkers of evolution

NCT04373200 SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Biological: Blood samples collection Other: Saliva collection
MeSH:Coronavirus Infections Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult Acute Lung Injury

Primary Outcomes

Description: Blood sample

Measure: Number of increased immune population

Time: Month 4

Description: Blood sample

Measure: Number of decreased immune population

Time: Month 4

Description: Blood sample

Measure: Number of statically different phenotypes compared to control patients

Time: Month 4

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Qualitative identification of immune subpopulations showing a significant variation compared to controls and quantification of this variation (at D1 and/or D14)

Measure: Gain or loss of functional phenotypic markers between D1 and D14

Time: Day 14

Description: Qualitative identification of immune subpopulations showing a significant variation between acute and mild COVID-19 and quantification of this variation (at D1 and/or D14)

Measure: Gain or loss of functional phenotypic markers between between acute and mild infections

Time: Day 14

Description: Qualitative identification of immune subpopulations showing a significant variation between acute stage and recovery (at 4 months) and quantification of this variation

Measure: Gain or loss of functional phenotypic markers between D1 and month 4

Time: Month 4

Description: Blood sample

Measure: Evaluation of V, D, J gene usage alterations in the immunoglobulin and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires during ARDS linked to COVID-19

Time: Day 14

Description: Blood sample

Measure: Identification of the Ig classes and of V, D, J sequences of anti-CoV-2 antibodies

Time: Month 4

Description: Blood sample

Measure: Characterization of a new set of human antibodies from patients who have recovered of COVID-19

Time: Month 4

4 Study of Kinetics and Efficacy of the Immune Response Against COVID-19 Among Hospital Staff

COVID-19 is a pathology linked to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, a new virus of the coronaviridae family that emerged in China in December 2019 before rapidly becoming a pandemic according to the WHO on March 11, 2020. The epidemic affected France from February 2020. On February 24, a patient hospitalized at Percy hospital was the cause of a major nosocomial epidemic, potentially responsible for more than 250 symptomatic people in the hospital as of April 6. The outbreak was identified by Percy hospital management on March 16, and barrier measures were immediately put in place. From March 20, a mixed investigation unit set up a chain of nasopharyngeal swabs for Percy hospital staff. A COVID-19 case reporting unit was set up at Percy hospital in response to the identification of the outbreak within the hospital. This unit carried out rapid identification and regular follow-up until the return to work of the staff. Thus all symptomatic patients are identified and the COVID-19 case census cell will follow all Percy hospital staff, including volunteers recruited to deal with the epidemic, throughout the duration of the epidemic. This population, captive by nature, will be one of the few described in the world during this epidemic. Current data on short-, medium- and long-term immunity induced by COVID-19 infection are fragmentary, as is the existence of a large asymptomatic population, making it difficult to cut the chains of transmission in the absence of an effective diagnostic tool. Another important issue is the quality of immunity induced by the infection, as it conditions the future of the pandemic, which could become endemic and recurrent if immunity were not sterilizing. As yet unpublished data in primates show that in the primate model re-infection is not possible in the short term, while patients cured from the Wuhan epidemic seem to be detected again positive for virus shedding. The objective of this study is to characterize the immunity (systemic and local) induced by SARS-Cov-2 infection among Percy hospital staff who are at high risk of contamination even in a period of confinement.

NCT04408001 Sars-CoV2 Other: Clinical interview Biological: Blood collection Biological: Saliva collection

Primary Outcomes

Description: The presence of induced immunity will be identified by an Ig family switch on the first two serologies with a high titre of specific IgG and disappearance of IgM.

Measure: Induced SARS-CoV2 immunity

Time: At day 21 (compared to enrollment [Day 0])

Description: The presence of induced immunity will be identified on serology analysis at 6 months.

Measure: Long-term protection of induced SARS-CoV2 immunity at 6 months

Time: 6 months following enrollment

Description: The presence of induced immunity will be identified on serology analysis at 1 year.

Measure: Long-term protection of induced SARS-CoV2 immunity at 1 year

Time: 1 year following enrollment

Description: Kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using ELISA technique on serum samples from enrollment (Day 0) to 1 year after enrollement

Measure: Anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies kinetics in blood throughout the study

Time: From enrollment (Day 0) to 1 year after enrollement

Description: Kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using ELISA technique on saliva samples from enrollment (Day 0) to 1 year after enrollement

Measure: Anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies kinetics in saliva throughout the study

Time: From enrollment (Day 0) to 1 year after enrollement

Description: Kinetics of serum neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 positive using ELISA technique on serum samples from enrollment (Day 0) to 1 year after enrollement.

Measure: Kinetics of serum neutralization in blood throughout the study

Time: From enrollment (Day 0) to 1 year after enrollement

Secondary Outcomes

Description: Anti-SARS-Cov2 seroprevalence measured in serum samples collected at Day 0.

Measure: Anti-SARS-CoV2 seroprevalence in asymptomatic individuals at Day 0

Time: At enrollment (Day 0)

Description: Anti-SARS-Cov2 seroprevalence measured in serum samples collected at Day 21.

Measure: Anti-SARS-CoV2 seroprevalence in asymptomatic individuals at Day 21

Time: At Day 21

5 SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) Diagnosis in Human Saliva by MALDI-TOF MS Profiling

Since March 2020, SARS-CoV2 virus (nCoV19; COVID-19) is considered pandemic. Its high rate of spread and infection in the human population and the lack of effective and validated treatment have led the authorities of several countries to confine their populations to slow the spread of COVID-19. As part of the management of this health crisis, the screening of individuals is essential in order to isolate "infected cases". These screening tests are currently performed on nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR for the detection of viral RNA. Although sensitive and specific, these tests remain relatively long (2-5 hours), expensive and the strong international demand for nucleic extraction kits and enzymes are factors limiting the implementation of widespread screening (problem of supply of swabs, molecular biology consumables). In order to prevent the risks of a shortage of screening means, we propose to develop an innovative alternative strategy, PCR-free, based on the detection of specific protein signatures in human saliva by MALDI-TOF MS profiling. MALDI-TOF MS profiling is a method used in routine diagnostics by microbiology laboratories for the identification of microorganisms. MALDI-TOF MS profiling has been successfully used to classify individuals according to their infectious status (oral pathologies) based on the analysis of their saliva, but also as a tool for the identification of respiratory viruses from cell culture supernatants. In addition, we have expertise and skills in the field of MALDI-TOF MS profiling and have implemented new strategies to improve the quality of profiles and their analysis, particularly in the context of entomological and vector identification projects. Finally, recent Chinese studies have reported that COVID-19 was detectable in saliva by RT-PCR. The main objective of this study is to develop a test based on the MALDI-TOF profiling method to detect individuals infected with SARS-CoV2 from saliva sample.

NCT04460638 SARS-CoV 2 Biological: Saliva collection Other: Clinical assessment

Primary Outcomes

Description: The development of this test is based on machine learning techniques, which involve "training" a mathematical model, in which the results of the mass spectrometry analysis of saliva samples and clinical data will be used to determine the information needed to distinguish a saliva sample from a SARS-CoV2-infected participant from a healthy saliva sample.

Measure: Development of a test based on the MALDI-TOF profiling method to detect individuals infected with SARS-CoV2 from saliva sample.

Time: Day 30

Secondary Outcomes

Description: For each saliva sample, the status ("correct" or "incorrect") of the classification of the sample ("infected" or "not infected") by the test (MALDI-TOF MS profiling) will be determined. Then the rate of correct classification will be calculated. The test will be considered efficient when it has reached a correct classification rate of more than 95%.

Measure: Rate of correct classification by the test (MALDI-TOF MS profiling) from saliva sample

Time: Day 30

Description: For each saliva sample, the status ("correct" or "incorrect") of the classification of the sample ("infected" or "not infected") by RT-PCR will be determined. Then the rate of correct classification by RT-PCR will be calculated.

Measure: Rate of correct classification by RT-PCR from saliva sample

Time: Day 30

Description: On each saliva sample, the expression of proteins will be determined using mass spectrometry. By comparison between SARS-CoV2 infected saliva samples and non-infected saliva samples, the presence of proteins that are specifically expressed in SARS-CoV2 infected saliva samples will be determined.

Measure: Identification of proteins specific to the SARS-CoV2 infection

Time: Day 30

Description: On each SARS-CoV2 infected saliva sample, the presence of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies, by RT-PCR, will be determined.

Measure: Presence of a positive anti-SARS-CoV2 antibody response by RT-PCR

Time: Day 30

Description: In SARS-CoV2 infected participants (Covid+ hospitalization group and Covid+ outpatient group), the presence of a correlation between the presence of proteins specific to the SARS-CoV2 infection and the clinical evolution of patients will be determined.

Measure: Correlation between the identified protein markers and the clinical course of the participants.

Time: Day 30


No related HPO nodes (Using clinical trials)